| First | Prev | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 1890 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Mohd. Tahir vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 438345]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2012 |
Sew-Curodrive India (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 437811]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2012 |
Devi Iron Power Ltd. and Anr. vs CCE
Waiver of pre-deposit: Undue hardship-No finding recorded as to undue hardship being suffered by petitioner on making it liable to deposit, Impugned order set aside, Matter remitted-To consider the issue of waiver of pre-deposit, the appellate tribunal was required to apply its mind and record a definite finding as to whether in t [LexDoc Id : 435932]
|
HC (Chhattisgarh) |
2012 |
Iqbal Sikandar Pathan vs Commissioner of Police, State of Maharashtra and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 431200]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
Amod Stampings (P) Ltd. vs CC
Procedure of appellate tribunal: Non-formulation of point of difference of opinion by two members of bench-Third member required to send the matter back to division bench for formulating such point and thereafter decide the question-Once the third member had found that point of difference of opinion had not been formulated by the two members of the bench, then the third member was [LexDoc Id : 442040]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2012 |
Subhendu kumar Mohanty vs Orissa Power Generation Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 436676]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2012 |
T.V. Shajahan, T.A. Ibrahim and N.V. Sulfikar vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 435635]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2012 |
Binani Cement Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 433653]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2012 |
Pavitar Singh vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 431785]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2012 |
CC vs Tararam Prajapati
Order of tribunal: No independent finding given as to whether reasoning of lower authority agreed with or not-Impugned order quashed and set aside, Matter restored-On perusal of impugned order, it was noted that the tribunal had merely quoted the reasoning given by CC(A) and had not given any independent finding [LexDoc Id : 441185]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
CC vs Rohan Anirudha Seolekar, Customs and Central Excise Settlement Commission and Anr.
Rohan Anirudha Seolekar vs CC and Anr.
Order of settlement commission: Issue involved a pure question of fact and findings given based on valid material and evidence-No fresh material evidence brought nor any statutory provision pointed out to take contrary view, Impugned order in accordance with law, Petitioner entitled for refund-When the issue involved was a pure question of fact and the findings given by settlement commission were based on valid material and evidence, such or [LexDoc Id : 440091]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2012 |
CC vs Surbhit Impex (P) Ltd.
Incorrect classification of goods: Absence of mala fide intention-No allegations of evasion of payment of duty or collusion, No case for confiscation or redemption-The assessee had declared its goods as polyester fabrics and claimed classification thereof under Customs Tariff Headings 5407 52 10 and 5407 52 20. T [LexDoc Id : 438333]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
Shaw Wallace and Co. Ltd. vs Kishore Rajaram Chhabria
Court not empowered to adjudge facts on affidavits and conclude that cause of action in suit was extinguished-Plaint liable to be rejected if it disclosed no cause of action or suit had become barred by law, Court not permitted to declare on affidavits that suit had served its purpose and should be dismissed, Such decree passed upon trial of suit-There was no power in the court to adjudge facts on affidavits and come to a conclusion that the cause of action in a suit was extinguished. There was [LexDoc Id : 437386]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2012 |
S. Jamal and Ambalam Khaja vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 437344]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2012 |
J.K. Laxmi Cement Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 437313]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2012 |
Ashish Kumar Agarwal vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 437306]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2012 |
Aluminium Industries Ltd. and K.N. Liaquat vs CE, CE and Service Tax
[LexDoc Id : 434464]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2012 |
Shehala Pramod Desai, In re
[LexDoc Id : 432705]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
Azizur Rahaman vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 435743]
|
CESTAT (Calcutta) |
2012 |
Mangesh P. Wadkar vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 432175]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
Bhavana N. Shah and Palak Nitin Shah vs Nitin Chimanlal Shah
[LexDoc Id : 431127]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
Gujarat Ambuja Exports Ltd. vs GOI
[LexDoc Id : 430900]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2012 |
Pushpa Pathak vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 443435]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2012 |
Executive Engineer vs Bakulaben Chandreshbhai Somani
[LexDoc Id : 442776]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2012 |
Gujarat State Road Transport Corpn. vs Shabir Hussain G. Shaikh
[LexDoc Id : 442438]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2012 |
| |
| First | Prev | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | Next | Last |
| |
