First | Prev | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 1890 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
Afroz vs A.P.S.F.C. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 438544]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2012 |
SSS Sai Shipping Services (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 437417]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2012 |
Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. vs West Coast Pharmaceuticals Works Ltd. and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 435898]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2012 |
Wood Work of Handicraft Association vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.
Amendment to rule 7 of Rajasthan Forest Produce (Establishment and Regulation of Saw Mills) Rules 1983: Maximum period of license prescribed to be five years and thereafter renewal for every subsequent five years-No vested right accruing in licensee’s favour of continuation of license, No restriction put on right to carry on occupation, trade or business, Conditions subject to which license granted were regulatory measures, Amendments not arbitrary or illegal-There was no restriction earlier on the period for which license was to be granted. But by way of inserting new sub-rule (iv) in rule 7 of Rajasthan F [LexDoc Id : 436068]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2012 |
Shiv Om Shipping Agency vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 430965]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
CC vs Millipore India Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 435448]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2012 |
Pratima Clearing Agency vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 431321]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Pundole Shahrukh and Co. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 430964]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Global International vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 430899]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2012 |
Sun Clearing and Forwarding Services (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 454549]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Indian Council of Social Welfare vs Rajdan Magdan Charan and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 442512]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2012 |
K.I. International Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 436713]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2012 |
Sanjit Biswas vs State of West Bengal and Ors.
Jurisdiction of taxation tribunal under West Bengal Taxation Tribunal Act 1987: Claim that amendments in rule 28 of West Bengal Excise (Country Spirit) Rules 2009 to result in huge business losses-Business losses likely to be suffered incidental to payment of excise duty in terms of amended rule 28, High court not the proper forum for an order for consideration of grievance, Petition dismissed-The petitioners were licensees or retailers of country spirit. They claimed that the amendments in rule 28 of the West Bengal Excise (Country Spirit) [LexDoc Id : 435688]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2012 |
Sonal Prafull Wani vs Prafull Sadashiv Wani
[LexDoc Id : 432712]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
Steel Authority of India Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 431977]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2012 |
Nimbark Textile Mills, S.B. Agarwal, Chandra Textiles, Chandrakanta Singhal, , Shree Kundan (P) Ltd., Shyam Maheshwari, Jtpl Texmart Ltd. S.B. Agrawal, Royal Crafts and Creations (P) Ltd. Arun Kumar Dhandharia, Kapil Fabrics, Kapil Sarawagi vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 431616]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2012 |
Amdocs Development Centre India (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 447711]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Sunil Kumar Talapatra vs State of West Bengal and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 442786]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2012 |
Gujarat State Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd. vs B.K. Bhatt
[LexDoc Id : 442511]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2012 |
ABB Ltd., In re
[LexDoc Id : 441252]
|
GOI |
2012 |
CC and CE vs Ind Synergy Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 437837]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2012 |
Posco India Delhi Steel Processing Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 434651]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2012 |
Kumar's Cotex Ltd. Anil Kumar Aggarwal and Abhishek Aggarwal vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 434592]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2012 |
Vijay Bansilal Gaud vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 432746]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
Hazari Trading Co. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 431207]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
|
First | Prev | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | Next | Last |
|