| First | Prev | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 1890 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Hari Krishan and Anr. vs Management of Northern Scales Co.
[LexDoc Id : 443754]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
Advance Petrochemicals Co. vs DA
[LexDoc Id : 434149]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2012 |
D.K. Electricals Industries and Anr. vs Sancheti Appliances (P) Ltd. and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 446441]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
Suresh vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 444497]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
Alka Mathur vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 442520]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2012 |
Natural Resources Allocation, In re
[LexDoc Id : 437472]
|
SC |
2012 |
Union Territory of Lakshadweep and Ors. vs Seashells Beach Resort and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 437281]
|
SC |
2012 |
Sujal Dye Chem Industries vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 435176]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2012 |
Director of Revenue Intelligence vs Vinod Kumar Mulani
[LexDoc Id : 428628]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
Schankar Clearing and Forwarding vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 428544]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2012 |
Joaquim L. Dias and Ines L. Dias vs Baptist Coelho, Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd. and Ponda Municipal Council
[LexDoc Id : 428041]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
Jeevan Abajirao Ghogre Patil and Mohd. Muqeet Mohd. Sab vs Nanded-Waghala Municipal Corpn., Mahesh @ Balu Khomane, Nanded Waghala City Municipal Corpn., State of Maharashtra, Jeevan Abajirao Ghogre Patil, Arshad Hussain Irshad Hussain and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 428039]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
Futurmal Kapoorchand Borana vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 427879]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
State of Madhya Pradesh vs Rakesh Kohli and Anr.
Challenge to constitutionality of article 45(d) of Schedule 1-A to Indian Stamp Act 1899-Legislative idea behind article 45(d) to curb tendency of transferring immovable properties through power of attorney and inappropriate documentation, Article 45(d) not arbitrary, unreasonable and irrational-Two writ petitions came to be filed before the Madhya Pradesh High Court in which it was prayed article 45(d) of Schedule 1-A to the Indian Stamp Act [LexDoc Id : 426850]
|
SC |
2012 |
Patel Engg. Ltd. vs UOI and Anr.
National Highways Authority Act 1956: Concomitant power of authority not to enter into contract with a particular person flowing from s.3-Rules of interpretation not applicable to bid document, Failure to mention blacklisting in bid document not disabling authority to blacklist a delinquent bidder-The authority of the second respondent to enter into contracts, consequently, the concomitant power not to enter into a contract with a particular per [LexDoc Id : 426654]
|
SC |
2012 |
Mohd. Khalil Chisti vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 442598]
|
SC |
2012 |
Exotica Global (P) Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
Refusal to entertain settlement application-Non-completion of recovery not entitling a person to offer a lesser amount than what had been adjudicated to be due from him-Following the reply to show cause notice, adjudication proceedings were commenced and culminated in the claim as made being maintained. The petitioner [LexDoc Id : 438666]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2012 |
Ideal Carpets Ltd. vs UOI
Reimport of goods: Direction to deposit differential duty, penalty and provisional duty-No order of assessment, penalty or provisional assessment quantifying liability passed, Proceedings under s.110 or s.110A not initiated, Matter remanded-The petitioner had produced all the relevant documents of reimport before the concerned authorities and also stated that in case the authorities were [LexDoc Id : 438338]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2012 |
Shanthi Alloys (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 431332]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2012 |
Monarch Infrastructure (P) Ltd. vs Ulhas Nagar Municipal Corpn. and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 428759]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
Aruna Rodrigues and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 426642]
|
SC |
2012 |
Divya Dubey and Anr. vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 447512]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2012 |
Executive Engineer and Anr. vs Balata and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 442517]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2012 |
Huawei Telecommunications India (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 437906]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2012 |
Venus Jewel vs Commissioner of Service Tax
Territorial jurisdiction of high court: Cause of action arising wholly or in part-Expression ‘in part’ comprehensive and taking within its sweep even an infinitesimal fraction of cause of action-It was incumbent on the court to examine whether the cause of action wholly or partly had arisen within the local limits of its jurisdiction. If it ha [LexDoc Id : 435853]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2012 |
| |
| First | Prev | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | Next | Last |
| |
