| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 191 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Essar Oil Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 482506]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2015 |
Astron Zinc Industries vs CC
Illegal import of Zinc Scrub-Confiscation, redemption fine and imposition of penalty -The appellant challenged the confiscation/redemption and imposition of penalty for bringing imported goods at ICD Sanand. Whether, or not Zinc Scrub i [LexDoc Id : 482499]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2015 |
Secure Meters Ltd. vs CC
Classification of goods: Liquid Crystal Display (LCDs)-Explanatory Notes issued by World Customs Organisation covering LCDs under 'other devices', LCDs classifiable under Chapter Heading 9013.80-The appellant had sought clearance of Liquid Crystal Display (LCDs) under Chapter Heading 9013.80 of Customs Tariff Act 1975 and claimed assessment at [LexDoc Id : 481906]
|
SC |
2015 |
G.S. Sales Corpn., Goyal International and Ors. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 482507]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2015 |
State of Tamil Nadu vs Tvl. Andavar Minerals and Industries
Expenses relating to grinding, loading and unloading and freight charges held post-sale expenses by tribunal-Decline of high court to differ with finding of fact arrived at by tribunal-On the question whether the expenses, viz., grinding, loading and unloading and freight charges, claimed by the assessee were post-sale expenses or pr [LexDoc Id : 483705]
|
HC (Madras) |
2015 |
Madhav Industrial Corpn., R.K. Industries, Ashwin Corpn. and Ors. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 482515]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2015 |
G. Murugendran vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 482221]
|
HC (Madras) |
2015 |
Ame De Verre (P) Ltd. vs CTT
Import of goods from Italy: Goods related to 'luxury style of living'-Rejection of a commodity from the category of 'Handicrafts' only because it was also an object d'art improper-The fact that 'Baldi' items were imported from Italy was considered by the tribunal and it was observed that the legislature could not have conceivabl [LexDoc Id : 481755]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Johnson Watch Co. (P) Ltd. vs Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
Challenge to notice seeking information: Doubts entertained by customs authorities necessarily to be stated-Contention that notice containing finding against appellant rejected, Appeal dismissed-The appellant could not pick a line here and a line there, out of context and impute a motive, which a reading of the whole document did not disclose. [LexDoc Id : 481851]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Srikant Bagla vs CC and Ors.
Import of hazardous goods: Prayer for payment of demurrage charges by customs-Clear finding of CRCL that goods classifiable as hazardous, Lack of testing centres in India, Petitioner having a substantial contribution to make towards the delay, No relief entitled-The petitioner had imported a large quantity of a substance alleged to be furnace oil. The goods were detained by the customs for a long period of tim [LexDoc Id : 481772]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2015 |
Samridhi Overseas and Neelam Imports vs UOI and Ors.
Detention of goods: Allegation that imports made by another person using IEC of petitioners-Retraction of statement made under s.108, Goods freely importable, Provisional clearance directed-The petitioners were the Import Export Code (IEC) holders. They had imported certain goods and had also filed the bills of entry. The goods had been d [LexDoc Id : 481646]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
WIPRO Ltd. vs Assistant Collector of Customs and Ors.
Challenge to constitutional validity of proviso (II-i) of rule 9(2)-Addition of one percent of FOB value as cost of loading, unloading and handling charges justified only when such charges not ascertainable-The petitioner had challenged constitutional validity of proviso (II-i) of rule 9(2) of the Customs Valuation (Determination of Price of Imported Good [LexDoc Id : 480952]
|
SC |
2015 |
Control Print Ltd. and Anr. vs Narcotics Control Bureau and Ors.
Seizure of controlled substance-Issues raised directly in question in pending proceeding, Questions raised left unanswered-Legal issues should not be answered merely because they had arisen in a given case. The cognate facts should not be ignored. In the present case, as f [LexDoc Id : 480844]
|
SC |
2015 |
IVRCL Infrastructure and Projects Ltd. vs CC
Strict construction of eligibility criteria laid down in exemption notification-Liberal construction to be adopted when applicant satisfying the conditions therein-Whereas eligibility criteria laid down in an exemption notification was required to be construed strictly, once it was found that the applicant satisf [LexDoc Id : 480787]
|
SC |
2015 |
CC vs Essar Steel Ltd.
Customs Valuation (Determination of Price of Imported Goods) Rules 1988-Cost and services actually paid or payable for imported goods pre-import to be added for determining value of imported goods-A reading of rule 4 and rule 9 of the Customs Valuation (Determination of Price of Imported Goods) Rules 1988 made it clear that only those costs and [LexDoc Id : 480617]
|
SC |
2015 |
State of Punjab vs Saurabh Bakshi
Reduction due to payment of compensation in realm of misplaced sympathy-Conviction by lower courts, Respondent ordered to be taken into custody-In an appeal against reduction of sentence to the period already undergone, the Supreme Court held that it could not be said as a proposition of law t [LexDoc Id : 479822]
|
SC |
2015 |
State of Tamil Nadu vs Bata India Ltd.
Inclusion of sale price in tax component but shown separately for determining taxable turnover-Sales tax and surcharge charged not forming part of turnover, Assessee held entitled to deduction-The AO, in respect of each assessment year, did not accept the assessee's plea for exclusion of tax component for the purpose of determining taxable t [LexDoc Id : 481080]
|
HC (Madras) |
2015 |
Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. and Volkswagen India (P) Ltd. vs UOI and Designated Authority and Ors.
Quasi-judicial functions of designated authority-Written submissions or comments no substitute for meaningful opportunity of hearing to interested parties-The designated authority carried out a quasi-judicial function and he should give a reasonable opportunity of hearing to interested parties before he [LexDoc Id : 480085]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Shreya Singhal vs UOI
Constitution validity of provisions providing punishment for sending offensive messages through communication service-Section 66A of the Information Technology Act of 2000. Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Article 19 of the Constitution of India. Article 21 of the Constitution of India Freedom of speech and expression-Petitioners challenged the constitutionality of Section 66A. Whether, section 66A of the act constitutional invalid as it infringes with the fundament [LexDoc Id : 479512]
|
SC |
2015 |
Prabhu Dayal, Vinod Kumar and Niranjan Baghel vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 479647]
|
CAT (Delhi) |
2015 |
Priya Parameswaran Pillai vs UOI and Ors.
Lock out circular against travelling abroad-Article 19(1) (a) of the Constitution of India. Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Violation of fundamental rights. Reasonable restrictions-Whether, the issuance of an LOC against petitioner was justified or resulted in violation of her fundamental right, under Article 21, and 19(1)(a) of [LexDoc Id : 478997]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Bharat Solvent and Chemical Cropn. vs UOI and ors.
Dumping of goods exported in or from Russia-Rule 2(c) of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti- Dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995. Interested party: Opportunity of Hearing-Petitioner sought quashment of the final findings of the Designated Authority (DA) in respect of the alleged dumping of Pentaerythritol(Penta) origina [LexDoc Id : 478881]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Rajhoo Barot, Atlanta Ltd. vs CC
Violation of conditions of exemption notification-Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962. Section 111(o) of the Customs Act, 1962. Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962. Imposition of Customs duty along with penalties -Customs duty demands along with interest and penalties confirmed on the road construction machinery imported by the appellant for violating the condit [LexDoc Id : 478574]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2015 |
Campaign against Manual Scavenging, Warkari Seva Sangh and UOI vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 480080]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2015 |
Mahaveer Selection vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.
Disallowance of input tax credit: Production of relevant documents by petitioner-Involvement of petitioner presumed without there being any justifiable reason-Pursuant to the summon issued by the assessing authority asking the petitioner to prove the genuineness of purchase transaction, the petitioner had fi [LexDoc Id : 480026]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2015 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Next | Last |
| |
