| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 191 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Addl. CCT vs Taluka Tent Decorators
VAT liability: Renting out of tents, cutlery, furniture and carpets by a tent house-Definition of sale under s.2(35)(iv) covering even goods transferred on short duration-On the question whether renting out of tents, cutlery, furniture and carpets by a tent house was covered by the definition of sale in s.2(35)(iv) of t [LexDoc Id : 480259]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2015 |
Sudhir Sharma, R.N. Zutshi, Ajayyadav, Yash Pal, V.K. Khurana, T.R.K. Reddy and Pradeep Rana vs CC
Method adopted to assess liability -Calculation of penalty-Whether, CESTAT erred in its findings regarding the method adopted in arriving at the average weight to assess liability. Held, the Commissioner does [LexDoc Id : 478564]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Jitendra R. Gandhi vs CST
[LexDoc Id : 481311]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2015 |
Radhey Shyam and Anr. vs Chhabi Nath and Ors.
Jagdish Prasad vs Iqbal Kaur and Ors.
Judicial orders of civil courts not amenable to writ of certiorari-Scope of article 227 different from article 226-Judicial orders of civil courts were not amenable to a writ of certiorari under article 226 of the Constitution of India. A writ of mandamus did not l [LexDoc Id : 478195]
|
SC |
2015 |
Commissioner vs A.K. Woollen Industries
Setting aside of penalty under DVAT Act 2004 on ground that rules not yet framed-Proceedings for violation of s.59(1) not dependent on the existence otherwise of rules-The tribunal had set aside the penalty order on the ground that sufficient opportunity had not been provided to justify imposition of mandatory penalt [LexDoc Id : 477981]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
CCE vs R.K.G. International
[LexDoc Id : 479487]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2015 |
Balaji Trading Co. vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.
Disallowance of input tax credit: Petitioner's reply rejected without consideration-Involvement in alleged first sale presumed without justifiable reason, Discarding of purchase transactions as not genuine unsustainable-Pursuant to the summon issued by the assessing authority asking the petitioner to prove the genuineness of purchase transaction, the petitioner filed [LexDoc Id : 480253]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2015 |
P.T. Asahimas Chemicals vs Ministry of Finance
[LexDoc Id : 479484]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2015 |
A.R. Overseas Tradecom (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 479368]
|
CESTAT (Calcutta) |
2015 |
Arvind Fashions Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 479370]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2015 |
Sony India (P) Ltd. vs State of Utter Pradesh and Ors.
Refund order: Competent authority obliged to adjudicate on refund application-Authorities liable to refund excess amount deposited by applicant-It was not necessary that an order of refund was required to be passed by the assessing authority in the assessment order or by the appellate authorit [LexDoc Id : 478042]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2015 |
State of Gujarat vs Doshi Printing Press
[LexDoc Id : 478592]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2015 |
Mangal Sain vs State of Punjab and Anr.
Punjab Value Added Tax Act 2005: Validity of initiation of criminal proceedings in the matter of evasion of tax-Act sufficient and equipped to deal with such matters, Registration of FIR abuse of process of law, Petitioner not present at the spot when vehicle apprehended, FIR quashed-There was a provision in the Punjab Value Added Tax Act 2005 of penalty to be imposed in case a goods vehicle was proceeding without the requisite doc [LexDoc Id : 481083]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2015 |
Orix Auto Infrastructure Services Ltd. vs Commissioner, Dvat, Delhi and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 478593]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
State of Gujarat vs Fair Link Corpn.
Grant or rejection of requirement of pre-deposit: Duty of tribunal-Tribunal not entitled to ignore legal principles and decide the matter on merit-If either side approached the tribunal, being aggrieved by the order of either grant or rejection of requirement of pre-deposit, it was open for the t [LexDoc Id : 479714]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2015 |
Prince Kumar and Ors. vs Institute of Co. Secretaries of India and Ors.
Internal management of an association-Scope of interference by court-In matters of internal management of an association, the courts normally did not interfere, leaving it open to the association and its members to fram [LexDoc Id : 482286]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
R.K. Industries and Madhav Industrial Corpn. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 479486]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2015 |
Om Shivay Enterprises vs Chief CC and Ors.
Non-clearance of goods: Goods alleged to be in nature of e-waste-Goods not cannibalized but complete machines required for re-use, Application for grant of permission to import pending, Direction to determine whether or not goods hazardous waste-The respondents were not clearing the petitioner's goods on the ground that such goods were in the nature of e-waste and, thus, qualified as hazardous [LexDoc Id : 478577]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
C.V.M. Exports vs Dty. CCT
Denial of balance refund on ground of limitation-No question of expiry of period when refund to the extent of 90 percent already made, Refund directed by way of adjustment towards future tax liability-Provisional refund to the extent of 90 percent of the amount was made to the petitioner. The petitioner did not apply for the disbursement of balance [LexDoc Id : 479711]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2015 |
CC vs Kadmabri Worldwide and Kultar Exports
Entitlement to DEPB benefit at declared export price-Computation of export price-Revenue disputed the entitlement to assesses the DEPB benefit at declared export price. Whether, Commissioner (Appeals) rightly set aside order of Adj [LexDoc Id : 478575]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2015 |
Fortis Health Care Ltd. and Anr. vs State of Punjab and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 478591]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2015 |
Gaurav Electronics vs Addl. Commissioner of Customs Sahnewal and Anr.
Demand of bank guarantee-Condition not to be imposed mechanically or as to tool to pressurise assessee-Demand of a bank guarantee was not only harsh but squeezed the assessee's business. The condition of a bank guarantee should not be imposed mechanical [LexDoc Id : 478576]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2015 |
CC vs Shubham Construction
[LexDoc Id : 477120]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2015 |
Kuldeep Kumar Dubey vs Ramesh Chandra Goyal
Maintainability of suit: Description of appellants as heirs instead of owners-Defect in description not affecting merits of case, Reversal of decree for eviction and payment of rent not justified-The Supreme Court, on the questions whether the suit filed by father of appellants in respect of property owned by first and second appellants could b [LexDoc Id : 482261]
|
SC |
2015 |
B. Khokhani and Co. vs CC and ACC
Denial of re-export of consignment: Non-recording of reasons in support of denial-Reasons given in counter affidavit not a substitute to reasons arrived at for denial, Impugned proceedings held unsustainable-A communication was served on the petitioner with one sentence mentioning denial of re-exporting the consignment. A perusal of communication showed no [LexDoc Id : 478035]
|
HC (Madras) |
2015 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Next | Last |
| |
