| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 358 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Global Fuels Lubricants, Inc vs Commissioner of Commercial Tax
Rejection of application seeking deferment of assessment: Commissioner vested with discretion under s.32(5) to defer proceedings on account of pendency of appeal before court-Non-exercise of discretion, Impugned order set aside with direction to pass appropriate order-The petitioner’s application under s.32(5) of Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act 2005 seeking deferment of the assessment proposed for the relevant ta [LexDoc Id : 451007]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2013 |
Samuel Nadvi vs Umerkhadi Co-op. Housing Society Ltd., Assistant Municipal Commissioner, Sara D. Awtade, Daniel K. Ovichegan, Mary K. Ovichegan
[LexDoc Id : 459336]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Samuel Nadvi vs Umerkhadi Co-op. Housing Society Ltd., Assistant Municipal Commissioner, Sara D. Awtade, Daniel K. Ovichegan and Mary K. Ovichegan
[LexDoc Id : 459304]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Florie Lawrence D'Souza (Dead) through L.Rs vs Nirmala Patrick Bergen and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 459049]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Sambhav Interchem (P) Ltd. vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 457622]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Rajaswa Karamchari Grih vs Prakash Chand Gangwal
[LexDoc Id : 454157]
|
NCDRC |
2013 |
Abid Osman and Co. vs State of Tamil Nadu and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 454963]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2013 |
Mahyco Seeds Ltd. @ Narmda Vally Hybrid Seeds Ltd. vs CTT
[LexDoc Id : 455018]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2013 |
Larsen and Toubro Limited and Anr. vs State of Karnataka and Anr.
Non-applicability of dominant nature test-States empowered to levy tax on materials used in contractrendering service or where ultimate transaction was transfer of immovable property-The dominant nature test had no application and the traditional decisions holding that the substance of contract should be seen had lost their signifi [LexDoc Id : 449970]
|
SC |
2013 |
Manoj Karam vs Ram Tuljiram Shahani and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 459026]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Jothi Engg. Works vs State of Tamil Nadu and DCTO
Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act 1959: Suo motu revisional power of Jt. Commissioner to direct initiation of penalty proceedings-No grievance on issue raised by revenue to levy penalty in first appeal, No inhibition on authority of Jt. Commissioner to invoke such powers, s.23 only for imposing penalty in lieu under s.45(2)(f), Appeal dismissed-The assessee had purchased tyres and tubes by availing concessional rate of tax under s.3(3) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act 1959 and used the [LexDoc Id : 451385]
|
HC (Madras) |
2013 |
Shirin Baman Faramarzi of Bombay Zoroastrian Iranian Inhabitant vs Zubin Boman Faramarzi of Bombay Ubduab Inhabitant, Himanshu Vinod Kode and Diniar Darab Mehta
[LexDoc Id : 459051]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Mohan Breweries and Distilleries Ltd. vs State of Tamil Nadu
[LexDoc Id : 456622]
|
HC (Madras) |
2013 |
Haripada Roy @ Haripada Gokulbihari Roy vs Subhash Chander Rewari
[LexDoc Id : 459125]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Vidarbha Winding Wires Ltd., Rohit Motilal Agrawal, Chandrapur Vidyut Conductors (P) Ltd., Rohit Motilal Agrawal, Kailash Poly Industries (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra, CST, Dy. CST, Development Corpn. of Vidarbha Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 458891]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Vidarbha Winding Wires Ltd. and Rohit vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Amendment to s.41C of Bombay Sales Tax Act 1959 resulting in curtailment of benefit period and also imposing unforeseen tax liability-Respondents directed not to extend amended provision to petitioners if their units never ceased to be SSI units during the eligibility period-Vide an amendment to s.41C of the Bombay Sales Tax Act 1959 a concept of approved gross fixed capital investment at the time of grant of eligibility c [LexDoc Id : 454068]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Ved Kapoor vs UOI
[LexDoc Id : 456847]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2013 |
Everest Engg. and Sales vs State of Punjab and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 455614]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2013 |
Works Contract and Leasing Tax vs Mukesh Goyal and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 472901]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2013 |
CTO vs Vijay Solvex Ltd. and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 456013]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2013 |
S. Kumars Ltd. vs Commissioner of Commercial Tax and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 455628]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2013 |
Santosh Steel vs Assistant CTO
[LexDoc Id : 455617]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2013 |
Shri Rathi Steels Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 450756]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2013 |
Assistant Commercial Taxes Officer vs Parekh Enterprises
[LexDoc Id : 449886]
|
SC |
2013 |
RG Scrap Traders vs State of Gujarat
[LexDoc Id : 476605]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2013 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
