| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 182 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
East Coast Constructions and Industries Ltd. vs Kerala State Electricity Board, Dty. Chief Engineer and CTO
[LexDoc Id : 486087]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2015 |
Amma Construction India (P) Ltd. vs ASST. CCT, CCT and State of Karnataka
[LexDoc Id : 485955]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2015 |
State of Tamil Nadu vs Annamalaiar Mills Ltd.
Tax liability: Transaction in question found as inter-State purchase by tribunal-Findings of tribunal based on material facts, supportive documents and sustained by sufficient reasoning, No reason to interfere-The tribunal, after verifying the facts stated by the assessee and by applying the principles laid down by the Supreme Court, was of the firm view tha [LexDoc Id : 484667]
|
HC (Madras) |
2015 |
National Hydroelectric Power Corpn. Ltd. vs State of Sikkim and Ors.
Sikkim Sales Tax Act 1983: Definition of 'sale' inclusive-Various sub-clauses of s.2(m) designed on article 366(29-A) of Constitution of India-The definition of 'sale' under s.2(m) of the Sikkim Sales Tax Act 1983 was inclusive and various sub-clauses thereof were designed on article 366(29-A [LexDoc Id : 483878]
|
HC (Sikkim) |
2015 |
Clean Foods Ltd. vs Commercial Tax Officer Sales Tax, Joint CCT and Addl. CCT
[LexDoc Id : 486004]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2015 |
Hotel Paras Garden and Prabhakar Digambar Lande vs Central Bank of India and Vasant Shrikrishna Wakte and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 483859]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2015 |
Kirti Ornaments (P) Ltd. vs State of Maharashtra
Conflict in provisions-Statutory provisions to be construed harmoniously with each other-When there was a conflict in two provisions with each other, such, that both of them could not stand, such provisions should be so interpreted that ef [LexDoc Id : 483706]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2015 |
Assistant Commercial Taxes Officer vs Binani Cement Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 485921]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2015 |
Saptagiri Restaurant vs Airports Authority of India
[LexDoc Id : 483770]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Gail India Ltd. vs Avinash Em Projects (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 482611]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Handum Iron and Steel Enterprises (P) Ltd. vs CCT
[LexDoc Id : 486247]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2015 |
Super Bhootpurva Sainik Suraksha Samiti vs U.P.S.R.T.C. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 482774]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2015 |
Pradip Nanjee Gala vs STO and Ors.
Interpretation of taxing statutes-No scope for impregnating the interpretation by reading equity into taxing statutes-The letter of law had to be accorded utmost respect and strictly adhered to especially while interpreting a taxing statute. There ought not exist any [LexDoc Id : 481726]
|
SC |
2015 |
Mohammad Ali vs State of Madhya Pradesh
[LexDoc Id : 482387]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2015 |
Chitradurga Sunflower Oil Complex (P) Ltd. and Anantha Refinery (P) Ltd. vs Asst. CCT, CCT and State of Karnataka
Karnataka Value Added Tax Act 2003: Refund applications kept in abeyance-Doctrine of unjust enrichment not applicable since language of s.10(5) clear and unambiguous, Direction to process refund applications-Refund applications of petitioners had been kept in abeyance by the first respondent by contending that under s.47 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax A [LexDoc Id : 484668]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2015 |
S.K. Jain vs Gas Authority of India Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 482383]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2015 |
Sharad Patil and D.G. Deshpande vs State of Maharashtra, Vinay Vilas Kore and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 481948]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2015 |
Cochin Port Trust vs State of Kerala
[LexDoc Id : 488254]
|
SC |
2015 |
Ramakant S. Bhattad and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 482002]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2015 |
Gaurav Rishi and Anr. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 481999]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Cochin Port Trust vs State of Kerala
Sales tax liability on port trust: Definition of dealer under s.2(viii) of Major Port Trusts Act 1963-Inclusion of persons involved in carrying on any business or trading activity and transactions effected by them whether in course of business or not-The appellant was a statutory authority constituted for rendering port services under the Major Port Trusts Act 1963. On the question whether the appe [LexDoc Id : 481283]
|
SC |
2015 |
Sambhu Prasad Agarwal vs Sr. Jt. CST and 2 Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 487076]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2015 |
Himachal Futuristic Communications Ltd. vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 481767]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Gammon India Ltd. vs Delhi Metro Rail Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 481678]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
CIT vs Sane and Doshi Enterprises
Taxability of income earned on leasing -Deduction under Section 24(a) of the Income Tax Act,1961. Income from House prorperty-The respondent-assessee was engaged in the real estate business and constructed a commercial complex. It filed its return of income including rental i [LexDoc Id : 481945]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2015 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Next | Last |
| |
