| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 182 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
ACC Ltd. vs State of Jharkhand and Ors.
State of Jharkhand and Ors. vs ACC Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 481411]
|
HC (Jharkhand) |
2015 |
Manisha Enterprises and Ors. vs State of Orissa and Ors.
Interpretation of statutes by judges-Words of judges while interpreting statutes not to be construed as a statute-Judgments could not be construed as statues. To interpret the words, phrases and provisions of a statute, it might become necessary for judges to emba [LexDoc Id : 480249]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2015 |
Sharma Furniture and Interior Decorator vs ACCT
Karnataka Value Added Tax Act 2003: Compounding of offences under s.82-Reassessment proceedings not to be clubbed with proceedings for compounding-The assessing authority had the power to reassess the appellant after it was reported that there was suppression of turnover by the appellant during t [LexDoc Id : 480251]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2015 |
Bharti Telemedia Ltd. and Ors. vs State of Tripura and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 480074]
|
HC (Tripura) |
2015 |
Fareeda Haji Vaheed vs Dty. Commissioner Appeals Commercial Taxes and Ors.
Challenge to order passed on rectification application-Penalty order of intelligence officer subsequently merging with appellate order-The petitioner-dealer had challenged an order passed by the first respondent on a rectification application filed by the petitioner seeking to rectify [LexDoc Id : 480018]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2015 |
Neel Industries (P) Ltd. vs State of Tamil Nadu
Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act 1959: Goods installed and used in factory site-Requirement envisaged under s.3(5) fully satisfied, Assessee entitled to concessional rate of tax-On the question whether the goods in question, viz. air drier, would be covered under s.3(5) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act 1959 and Form XVI [LexDoc Id : 481310]
|
HC (Madras) |
2015 |
Balaji Trading Co. vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.
Disallowance of input tax credit: Petitioner's reply rejected without consideration-Involvement in alleged first sale presumed without justifiable reason, Discarding of purchase transactions as not genuine unsustainable-Pursuant to the summon issued by the assessing authority asking the petitioner to prove the genuineness of purchase transaction, the petitioner filed [LexDoc Id : 480253]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2015 |
Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd. and Ors. vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.
Eligibility to benefit of concessional rate of tax: Registered dealer-Findings with regard to sale of pipes involved in works contract findings of fact, Benefit of exemption notification applicable prospectively-The petitioner had set up a factory and got itself registered as a dealer under the Central Sales Tax Act 1956 as well as the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act [LexDoc Id : 480076]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2015 |
National Thermal Power Corpn. Ltd. vs Ashok Kumar Singh and Ors.
Forfeiture of earnest money not infringing any statutory right under the Contract Act 1872-Purpose of providing forfeiture clause to see that only genuine bids received-While a person might have a right to withdraw his offer at any time before the acceptance was conveyed to him if the offer was itself subject to the c [LexDoc Id : 477548]
|
SC |
2015 |
Residency Food and Beverages Ltd. vs Trade Tax Tribunal
[LexDoc Id : 481309]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2015 |
Gharda Chemicals Ltd. vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 481085]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2015 |
Jai Balaji Jyoti Steels Ltd. vs Dty. CST and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 480078]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2015 |
Infosys Ltd. vs Dty. CCT, CCT, State of Karnataka and UOI
[LexDoc Id : 488476]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2015 |
Sree Kumar Engineering Works vs Assistant Commissioner
Filing of C Form in original by petitioner: Misplace of document by respondent-Denial of petitioner's request for accepting duplicate copy of document improper-From a reading of rule 10(2) of the Central Sales Tax (Tamil Nadu) Rules 1957, it was clear that the assessee was entitled to file form of declaration [LexDoc Id : 480255]
|
HC (Madras) |
2015 |
Hotel and Allied Traders (P) Ltd. vs State of Karnataka and Ors.
Writ jurisdiction of high court: Exercise of such jurisdiction discretionary-High court not acting as a court of appeal against the decision of court or tribunal to correct errors of fact-The jurisdiction of high court under article 226 of the Constitution of India was couched in wide terms and the exercise thereof was not subject to an [LexDoc Id : 480021]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2015 |
State of Gujarat vs Jagdish Oil Mill
Finalisation of assessment-Non abstain clause giving overriding effect for procedure prescribed for best judgment-The high court rejected the contention that the language of s.41(7) of the Sales Tax Act was with a non abstain clause and, therefore, it should be tr [LexDoc Id : 478044]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2015 |
Mookambikai Spinners vs CTO
Maintainability of writ petition: Availability of alternative remedy-Independent orders passed by authority, No case to invoke extraordinary jurisdiction of high court, Petition dismissed-In a writ petition challenging the assessment orders, the high court, perusing the impugned orders, held that the the authority had passed independent [LexDoc Id : 480202]
|
HC (Madras) |
2015 |
Avinash Em Projects (P) Ltd. vs GAIL India Ltd
Exercise of powers of judicial review-Scope of interference with quantum of penalty or punishment imposed-The high court, while exercising powers of judicial review, would be reluctant to substitute its own opinion on the quantum of penalty or punishment i [LexDoc Id : 478049]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
CCT vs Anand Tyres
Special provision made by legislature for a particular case-Presumption that another provision of general character not intended to interfere therewith-When the legislature had considered all the circumstances and made special provision for a particular case the presumption was that another provision [LexDoc Id : 477640]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2015 |
Tata Steel Ltd. vs State of Jharkhand and Ors.
Tax liability: Presumption of inter-State sale by respondent-Both sides ready to treat dispatches of goods as intra-State sale, Matter remanded-The respondent had allegedly presumed several transactions as inter-state Sale without appreciating the fact that the movements of goods in question h [LexDoc Id : 480261]
|
HC (Jharkhand) |
2015 |
Kandivali Co-op Industrial Estate and Anr. and Bulwark Warehousing Co. and Ors. vs Municipal Corpn. of Greater Mumbai and Ors.
Wadi Bunder Cotton Press Co., Tulsidas Khimji Warehousing (P) Ltd. and Ors. and Narendra and Co. and Anr. vs Brihan Mumba
Levy of taxes or fees: Delegation of power by legislature-Act of delegating power to local body without providing a maximum rate not by itself rendering the delegation excessive or invalid-A fee undoubtedly, was a payment primarily in public interest, but for some special services, rendered or some special work done for the benefit of th [LexDoc Id : 477016]
|
SC |
2015 |
Tata Global Beverages Ltd. vs CTO
Denial of request for reopening of assessment-Penalty imposed despite there being no proposal, No opportunity given before levying penalty, Direction to pass fresh order on merits-The petitioner had been denied its request for re-opening of assessment to admit Form C and Form F. On writ petition, the high court held that the ass [LexDoc Id : 480260]
|
HC (Madras) |
2015 |
Tata Global Beverages Ltd. vs CTO
Re-opening of assessment: Concerned authority to consider sufficient cause for re-opening-No proposal for levying penalty, Impugned order set aside-The assessing authority had proceeded to pass the impugned assessment order when the petitioner had produced forms 'C' and 'F'. When the petitioner so [LexDoc Id : 478590]
|
HC (Madras) |
2015 |
State of Karnataka Etc. vs Pro Lab and Ors. Etc.
Challenge to retrospective effect of Entry 25 of Schedule VI to KVAT Act 1957-Very basis on which Entry 25 declared as unconstitutional found to be erroneous-The petitioner had challenged the retrospective effect of Entry of Schedule VI to the Karnataka Sales Tax Act 1957 by arguing that such a move was vio [LexDoc Id : 476900]
|
SC |
2015 |
State of Gujarat vs Nishi Communication
Deletion of interest and penalty: Adjustment of input credit-No surplus balance of input credit, Element of avoidance of tax lacking, Impugned order upheld-The tribunal had confirmed the demand and the adjustment was permitted but the interest and penalty imposed were deleted. On appeal, the high court he [LexDoc Id : 479720]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2015 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Next | Last |
| |
