| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | Last |
| Documents Found: 288 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Honshu Buildcon (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs North Delhi Municipal Corpn.
Violation of clauses-Malafide conduct-Petition was filed against proceedings of cancellation of letters by NDMC. Whether, petitioners had violated clauses of NIT, if they were found to ha [LexDoc Id : 521030]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Envirad Projects (P) Ltd. vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 521027]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2018 |
Rakesh Construction Co. vs Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority and Ors.
Earnest Money Deposit-Non submission-Petitioner had challenged action of respondent in disqualifying petitioner for non submission of Earnest Money Deposit. Whether, respondent should be [LexDoc Id : 521032]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2018 |
Kisankraft Machine Tools (P) Ltd. vs State of Karnataka and Ors.
Re-assessment order-Imposition of tax-Whether, petitioner rightly assailed impugned Re-assessment Order under Section 39(1)(a) for tax period imposing 5% VAT under provisions of the KVAT A [LexDoc Id : 520937]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
J.C. Industries vs State of Karnataka, Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Input tax credit-Bogus dealer-Whether, petitioner was justified in allege that alleged breach of principles of natural justice in as much as adverse material was not confronted to [LexDoc Id : 520439]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
Varian Medical Systems International India (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
Rejection of tender-Non essential requirement-Petition was filed under grievance that Petitioner’s bid was rejected against respondent. Whether, respondent was justified by law by not furnished a [LexDoc Id : 521035]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Tata Metaliks Ltd. vs State of Tripura and Ors.
Rejection of bid-Non-responsive bidder-Technical bid of petitioner was rejected as non-responsive bidder. Whether, technical bid of petitioner was rightly rejected as non-responsive bidder. [LexDoc Id : 520375]
|
MISC |
2018 |
HDFC Bank Ltd. vs Prem Power Construction (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Winding up-Section 433 and section 434 of Companies Act, 1956. Service of.-Whether, notice of winding up under Sections 433 and 434 of Act was duly served upon Respondent or not. Held, apart from the fact that notice was sent [LexDoc Id : 520374]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
UOI vs Anamika Sugar Mills and Ors.
Impose restriction-Sale of levy sugar-Whether, Single Judge justified in passed order whereby its letter seeking to impose restriction on sale of levy sugar beyond the period of three mont [LexDoc Id : 520373]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Sukumar Barat and Ors. vs State of West Bengal and Ors.
Validity of order-Garnishee order-Petitioners question legality of amendments . Whether, complaint which was made by petitioners over issue of garnishee orders issued to two of their d [LexDoc Id : 520331]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2018 |
Uma Bricks Industries and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
Use of Form C-Section 10A of the Central Sale Tax Act, 1956. Section 33 of the Tripura Value Added Tax Act, 2004. Payment of tax-Petitioner challenged the notice seeking explanation from the petitioner as to why a penalty @ 150% on the leviable tax on the value of the JCB machin [LexDoc Id : 520330]
|
HC (Tripura) |
2018 |
Banwari Lal vs Public Information Officer and Assistant CTO and Ors.
Disclosure of information-Validity of rejection of application-Petitioner prayed for direction to respondent 1 to furnish the information requested as directed by the State Information Commission. Whether, the res [LexDoc Id : 520329]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2018 |
U.P. Power Transmission Corpn. Ltd. and Ors. vs Commissioner of Commercial Tax and Ors.
Validity of order-Misconstruction of provision-UPPTCL had filed instant Commercial Tax Revision petition, assailing order passed by Commercial Tax Tribunal. Whether, tribunal had committed a manife [LexDoc Id : 520328]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2018 |
| |
| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | Last |
| |
