First | 1 | 2 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 42 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
Bansapani Iron Ltd. vs State of Odisha
Orissa Value Added Tax Act 2004: Capital goods-Appointed date of operation of Act, Spare parts covered under the term 'capital goods' after appointed date-Whether the tribunal was justified in rejecting the petitioner's appeal on the scope, applicability and retrospectivity or otherwise of the amendment [LexDoc Id : 492705]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2015 |
Samsung India Electronics (P) Ltd. State of Punjab and ors.
[LexDoc Id : 492703]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2015 |
S.B. AUDIO and VIDEO vs Addl. CCT, JCCT and DCCT
Findings of lower authorities-Factual aspects and material particulars not adverted to, Matter remanded-Whether it was permissible for the appellate authority or the tribunal to render a finding merely on the broad principles of law and precedents withou [LexDoc Id : 492702]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2015 |
CST vs Jai Hind Industries Ltd.
Classification of products: Aluminum castings manufactured and sold in their raw, unfinished and primary form-Goods classifiable under Entry C-I-29 of Bombay Sales Tax Act 1959-Whether the tribunal was justified in holding that the non-ferrous metal castings as manufactured and sold by the respondents were nothing but non-fer [LexDoc Id : 492737]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2015 |
First Garment Mfg Co. India (P) Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner
Rejection of claim for refund of input tax credit on ground of limitation-Fact of export of goods not disputed, Respondents directed to consider the claim afresh-Whether rejection of claim for refund of input tax credit on the ground that the claim was not made within the statutory period of 180 days as per sec [LexDoc Id : 492706]
|
HC (Madras) |
2015 |
Nokia India (P) Ltd. vs ACCT and Ors.
Demand for differential tax on sale of chargers with cellular phones along with interest and penalty-Interim protection granted against recovery of penalty to similarly placed manufacturers, Impugned orders modified-Whether the demand for differential tax on sale of chargers with the cellular phones along with interest thereon as also penalty was sustainable. Held [LexDoc Id : 492734]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2015 |
Flipkart Internet (P) Ltd. vs State of Kerala, Intelligence Officer and Inspecting Assistant Commissioner
Kerala Value Added Tax Act 2003: Imposition of penalty-Absence of finding on specific issues, Petitions allowed-Whether imposition of penalty on the assessee under section 67 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act 2003 for breach of provisions of section 20 and secti [LexDoc Id : 492740]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2015 |
State of Karnataka vs United Breweries Ltd.
Levy of tax on manufacture of beer and packaged drinking water-Transfer of right to use brand name or trade mark-Whether levy of tax, penalty and interest, in the case of manufacture of beer, on the amount received by the assessee as 'brand franchise fees' from t [LexDoc Id : 492739]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2015 |
Hindustan Unilever Ltd. vs State of Uttarakhand and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 489224]
|
HC (Uttarakhand) |
2015 |
ABW Suncity vs State of Haryana and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 489225]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2015 |
New Devi Grit Udyog vs State of Haryana and Ors.
Rejection of tax invoice: Non-mentioning of buyer's name or TIN number-Rule 54(3) of Haryana Value Added Tax Rules 2003 procedural in nature and not conferring any substantive right-Whether rejection of tax invoice only on the ground that it did not contain the name of the buyer and its TIN number was proper. Held, non-mentioning [LexDoc Id : 492741]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2015 |
ACE Star Properties (P) Ltd. vs CTO and Appellate Dty. Commissioner
TNVAT Act 2006: Dismissal of appeal as against levy of tax on TDS and consequential levy of penalty-Only revision lying as against order passed under section 27(3), Petitioner relegated to revisional authority-Whether dismissal of appeal as against levy of tax on TDS and the consequential levy of penalty under section 27(3) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax [LexDoc Id : 492738]
|
HC (Madras) |
2015 |
Krishna Oil Stores vs CTO
[LexDoc Id : 489223]
|
HC (Madras) |
2015 |
Challenger Computers Ltd., Goel Oil Company Vikas Goel and Ors. vs CTT
Amba Aircool (P) Ltd. vs Commissioner Value Added Tax
[LexDoc Id : 487635]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Commissioner vs General Machinery Merchants Association
[LexDoc Id : 488317]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Ciftech Solutions (P) Ltd. vs State of Karnataka, CCT and Asst. CCT
[LexDoc Id : 489214]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2015 |
Global Calcium (P) Ltd. vs Asst. Commissioner Commercial Taxes
[LexDoc Id : 489206]
|
HC (Madras) |
2015 |
State of Karnataka vs Gopalan Enterprises, India Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 487591]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2015 |
Gold Range Castings (P) Ltd. vs State of Punjab and Ors.
Non-renewal of certificate of advance tax exemption: Delay in issuing certificate prejudicing assessee substantially-Not clear whether assessee entitled to any compensation, Respondents directed to process the application for renewal-The assessee had sought renewal of the certificate of advance tax exemption granted to it under a notification dated 04 October 2013. The application [LexDoc Id : 486649]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2015 |
Emelson Agencies vs Commissioner of Trade and Taxes
[LexDoc Id : 489222]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Nokia India Sales (P) Ltd. vs Asst. Commissioner, State of Tamil Nadu and Appellate Dty. Commissioner
[LexDoc Id : 486396]
|
HC (Madras) |
2015 |
Cethar Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner (CT)
[LexDoc Id : 487643]
|
HC (Madras) |
2015 |
Alliance Fibers Ltd. and 1 vs State of Gujarat and 2
Gujarat Value Added Tax Act 2003: Seizure of goods under s.68 and s.69-Goods seized before expiry of limitation period prescribed under s.73(4) not justified, Impugned order set aside-Impugned order was passed under s.68 and s.69 of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act 2003 by which the goods belonging to the petitioner came to be seized [LexDoc Id : 486397]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2015 |
Odisha Power Generation Corpn. Ltd. vs State of Odisha and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 480402]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2015 |
Powerlite Electricals India (P) Ltd. vs Commissioner Trade and Taxes
[LexDoc Id : 488311]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
|
First | 1 | 2 | Next | Last |
|