| First | Prev | 231 | 232 | 233 | 234 | 235 | 236 | 237 | 238 | 239 | 240 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 5976 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Paragon Constructions India (P) Ltd. vs UOI and Anr.
Adjudication of claim-Escalation-The adjudication of a claim made on account of escalation attributable to delay on the part of the respondent and its agencies was directed for fresh [LexDoc Id : 335699]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2008 |
Vocation Investment and Finance Co. (P) Ltd., Naresh Pachisia, Pachisia Mercantile Co. vs Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd., SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 335683]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2008 |
Ramniranjan Kedia Tourism Services (P) Ltd. vs Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd., DSP Merrill Lynch Ltd., Enam Financial Consultant (P) Ltd., National Stock Exchange of India Ltd., Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd., SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 335675]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2008 |
SEBI vs Premier Shares Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 335674]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2008 |
SEBI vs Bluechip Capital Market (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 335659]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2008 |
Sureinder Kumar and Ors. vs Suresh Kumar and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 335379]
|
SC |
2008 |
State of Punjab and Ors. vs Rajindra Cold Storage and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 335367]
|
SC |
2008 |
A. Jayachandra Reddy vs Desert Valley Medical Inc.
[LexDoc Id : 335332]
|
SC |
2008 |
Wasp Pump (P) Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
Levy of excise duty-Centrifugal pumps for captive consumption-A matter pertaining to levy of excise duty on centrifugal pumps used for captive consumption within a factory was remitted back to the Revenue to asce [LexDoc Id : 334318]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Usha Devi vs Rijwan Ahamd and Ors.
Amendment of pleadings-Due diligence, Wrong description of suit property-The Supreme Court held that the plaintiff-appellant ought to have been diligent in promptly seeking the amendment in the plaint at an early stage of t [LexDoc Id : 332105]
|
SC |
2008 |
Regional Manager Uttaranchal Rd. Tpt. Corpn. vs Than Singh and Anr.
Termination of services-Legality of issuing tickets based on instructions of checking staff-The issuance of tickets based on instructions of the checking staff could not legalize the illegality committed by the respondent employee. [LexDoc Id : 332104]
|
SC |
2008 |
Sambhaji Hindurao Deshmukh and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra
Possibility of two views from evidence on record-Reversal of acquittal not feasible, Benefit of doubt to accused-The Supreme Court held that if two views were reasonably possible from the evidence on record, one favouring the accused and one against the accused, [LexDoc Id : 332103]
|
SC |
2008 |
S. Raju vs C. Sathammai
Request for unconditional leave to defend-Application to defend allowed-The Supreme Court allowed the petitioner to defend the suit, instituted on the basis of a promissory note, subject to the condition of depositing a pa [LexDoc Id : 332102]
|
SC |
2008 |
H.U.D.A. vs Prem Kumar Agarwal and Anr.
Allotment of alternative plot-Entitlement to interest-The Supreme Court held that the respondent was entitled to interest at 12 percent per annum instead of 18 percent per annum as fixed by the National C [LexDoc Id : 332100]
|
SC |
2008 |
Bharat Aluminium Co. vs Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services Inc.
[LexDoc Id : 436164]
|
SC |
2008 |
Upendra Kumar vs STO
[LexDoc Id : 373025]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2008 |
Dinabandhu Das vs State of West Bengal and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 352905]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2008 |
Zorina Khatun vs State of West Bengal and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 352837]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2008 |
Vinod Hingorani vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Dishonour of cheque: Liability of director-Director resigning before issuance of cheques-The necessary averments i.e. accused were in charge of or responsible to the company for the conduct of the business being absent, the complaint under [LexDoc Id : 345894]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Minoo R. Shroff and Ors. vs Shiraaz D. Zilla and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 342975]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Bangali Baboo vs State of Jharkhand
[LexDoc Id : 341597]
|
HC (Jharkhand) |
2008 |
Rama Narayan Mali vs Addl. Collector and Ors. and Mahalaxmi Stone Crushing and Metal Suppliers vs Tahasildar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 340424]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Leela Chandrashekhar vs State of Goa and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 337471]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Videocon International vs SEBI
Offences under SEBI Act 1992-Appropriate court-The complaints under s. 24 of the SEBI Act 1992 pertaining to contravention of the provisions of the said Act, were required to be tried by the court [LexDoc Id : 336726]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Sarjerao Bhaurao Ekal vs S.K. Pant Walawalkar
[LexDoc Id : 336207]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
| |
| First | Prev | 231 | 232 | 233 | 234 | 235 | 236 | 237 | 238 | 239 | 240 | Next | Last |
| |
