Register free! 
Arbitration - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 231 | 232 | 233 | 234 | 235 | 236 | 237 | 238 | 239 | 240 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 5976   
Title Forum  Year
Kulwinder Kaur @ Kulwinder Gurcharan Singh vs Kandi Friends Education Trust and Ors. Transfer order-Non-application of mind-An order of transfer should reflect application of mind by the Court and the circumstances which weighed in taking the action. The Supreme Court obser [LexDoc Id : 331989]
SC 2008
Krishna Janardhan Bhat vs Dattatraya G. Hegde Evidentiary value of statutory presumption-Determination-The question whether the statutory presumption stood rebutted or not, was to be determined keeping in view the other evidences on record. Where the ch [LexDoc Id : 331988]
SC 2008
K.T. Palanisamy vs State of Tamil Nadu Circumstantial evidence-Alleged offence not proved-A judgment of conviction could not be founded on the sole circumstance of the deceased's having been last seen with the appellant by the prosecution w [LexDoc Id : 331987]
SC 2008
C.V. Satheeshchandran vs UCO Bank and Ors. Request for reversion made during probation and after promotion-Denial of future promotions and stagnation increments-The order of the respondent bank debarring the appellant of all future promotions to the higher rank of officer beyond the period of two years was ill [LexDoc Id : 331984]
SC 2008
Brijendra Singh vs State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr. Validity of adoption by a married woman under Hindu law-Bequeath of properties in favour of adopted son-A married woman, during the subsistence of her marriage, could not adopt at all except when her husband had completely and finally renounced the world [LexDoc Id : 331983]
SC 2008
Marimuthu and Ors. vs State of Tamil Nadu Benefit of doubt to one accused-Other accused not relieved from liability of offence-Benefit of doubt given to one of the accused did not imply that the remaining accused were relieved from the liability of the offence committed. The h [LexDoc Id : 331982]
SC 2008
Bank of India vs Bank of India Staff Union [LexDoc Id : 433164]
GOI 2008
Ganeshbhai Ambalal Patel vs State of Gujarat and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 352825]
HC (Gujarat) 2008
Vadodara Mahanagarpalika Naukar Mandal vs State of Gujarat and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 352783]
HC (Gujarat) 2008
R.G. Ispat Ltd. vs Labour Court and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 352194]
HC (Rajasthan) 2008
Chinnubai Durgajikamble and Ors. vs Western Coalfields Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 344190]
HC (Bombay) 2008
Dynasty Developers (P) Ltd. vs Jumbo World Holdings Ltd., British Virgin Islands and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 341510]
HC (Madras) 2008
Rajesh Varma vs Aminex Holdings and Investments and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 340422]
HC (Bombay) 2008
Asit Baran Modak vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 340345]
HC (Jharkhand) 2008
Devidas Ragho @ Ganpat Peche vs Raghoba Maroti Peche [LexDoc Id : 337571]
HC (Bombay) 2008
Rashtriya Chemical and Fertilizers Ltd. vs Vishal Sharma [LexDoc Id : 336201]
HC (Bombay) 2008
Dhirajlal Talakchand Sankalchand Shah, College of Commerce vs Ganpat Saraswat and Anr. Continuation of appointment-Oral appointment-The School tribunal’s order re-instating the respondent-teacher was set aside as the tribunal had erred in holding that the respondent-teacher was con [LexDoc Id : 336195]
HC (Bombay) 2008
Mathew Easow vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 335668]
SAT (Mumbai) 2008
State Bank of India vs Chokkalingam and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 331771]
HC (Chennai) 2008
Venture Global Engg. vs Satyam Computer Services Ltd. and Anr. International commercial arbitration-Applicability of Part I-Part I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 was applicable to all international commercial arbitration held out of India unless the parties by [LexDoc Id : 331770]
SC 2008
Town Planning Municipal Council vs Rajappa and Anr. Allowance of second appeal-Non-framing of question of law-The Supreme Court held that allowing of second appeal without framing a question of law was clearly contrary to the mandate of s.100 of Code of Civil [LexDoc Id : 331768]
SC 2008
Shiv Nath Prasad vs Saran Pal Jeet Singh Tulsi and Ors. Effect of constitutional amendments-Incumbent only entitled to accelerated promotion, not seniority-The Supreme Court held that the incumbent was entitled only to accelerated promotion, but not seniority, as neither the constitutional amendments nor [LexDoc Id : 331762]
SC 2008
Puran Singh vs State of Uttaranchal Conviction for murder-Benefit of doubt to appellant accused, Cartridge not fired from his gun-The appellant accused was entitled to benefit of doubt since as per the Ballistic report the cartridge was not fired from the single barrel alleged to [LexDoc Id : 331759]
SC 2008
Bija and Ors. vs State of Haryana [LexDoc Id : 331753]
SC 2008
CTT vs Mathura Prasad [LexDoc Id : 363193]
HC (Allahabad) 2008
 
First | Prev | 231 | 232 | 233 | 234 | 235 | 236 | 237 | 238 | 239 | 240 | Next | Last