Register free! 
Arbitration - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 231 | 232 | 233 | 234 | 235 | 236 | 237 | 238 | 239 | 240 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 5976   
Title Forum  Year
Mahesh Agarwal vs Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. and Ors. Reference to arbitration-Obligation of the court-The Trial Judge's decision directing the parties to arbitration to resolve the dispute between them was proper. Since the agreement between the partie [LexDoc Id : 347958]
HC (Calcutta) 2008
Rajinder Singh and Ors. vs UOI and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 343420]
HC (Bombay) 2008
Tas Holding (P) Ltd. vs Punjab and Sind Bank [LexDoc Id : 342488]
DRAT 2008
Punjab and Sind Bank vs Regional Labour Commissioner (Central) and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 341265]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2008
Municipal Council vs Rameshchandra Shankarlal Sabu and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 340863]
HC (Bombay) 2008
Infosys Automation System Ltd. and Ors. vs Oriental Bank of Commerce [LexDoc Id : 336117]
DRAT 2008
Punit Ahluwalia vs Arjan Singh and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 335365]
SC 2008
Nidhi Gupta vs Inderjit Singh [LexDoc Id : 335364]
SC 2008
Neeti Chatterji vs Rahul Chatterji and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 335363]
SC 2008
State of Haryana and Ors. vs Dinesh Kumar Arrest-Benefit of mistaken impression granted to applicant-The Supreme Court held that the fact that a person had never been arrested on his appearing before the Court and granted bail immediately gave the mis [LexDoc Id : 335341]
SC 2008
Daleep Singh vs R.D. Arjun Duty of the high court to give reasons-Non-application of mind, Absence of reasons rendered the order unsustainable-The impugned order passed by the high court without applying its mind and without passing a reasoned and speaking order was not sustainable and accord [LexDoc Id : 332876]
SC 2008
Bashistha Choudhary vs State of Bihar [LexDoc Id : 332309]
HC (Patna) 2008
UOI and Venkatesh Gopal Mahishi and Anr. Application for rectification of factual submission-Application allowed since mistake had been recorded in judgment-The application filed for rectification of factual submission was allowed, as rectification was essential since the mistake had been recorded in the j [LexDoc Id : 331769]
SC 2008
Bhadrappa (Dead) through L.Rs vs Tolacha Naik Prohibition on transfer of granted lands-Burden on proof on person in possession of such lands-The Supreme Court held that if any person other than the grantee or his legal heirs was in possession of the granted land, the burden was on such pers [LexDoc Id : 331767]
SC 2008
Sify Ltd. vs First Flight Couriers Ltd. Imposition of conditional leave to defend-Conditions for imposition-An imposition of conditional leave on the defendant to deposit an amount in court before proceeding further was justifiable only when it had no defenc [LexDoc Id : 331763]
SC 2008
V. Siva Kumar and Ors. vs Secretary, Ministry of Defence and Ors. Recruitment action-New OM issued not applicable to determine seniority-The Supreme Court held that if recruitment action had already been taken in respect of certain employees then the OM issued subsequently could not be [LexDoc Id : 331580]
SC 2008
Sunil Poddar and Ors. vs UOI, Union Bank of India Suit for recovery of loan transfer to DRT-Maintainability-An ex-parte order passed by the DRT directing recovery from the appellants was confirmed by the Supreme Court. The appellant’s contention that they we [LexDoc Id : 331578]
SC 2008
Sat Narain vs State of Haryana through Ministry of Home Claim to right of self defence-Evidence proving intention to kill-The high court was justified in not granting the benefit of right to exercise self defence, as the evidence clearly established that the reloading of [LexDoc Id : 331577]
SC 2008
Oriental Bank of Commerce vs Sunder Lal Jain and Anr. Declaration of non-performing asset-Maintainability of writ petition-The high court was not justified in issuing a writ of mandamus directing the appellant bank to declare the respondents' account as Non-Performing Asse [LexDoc Id : 331574]
SC 2008
Mani vs State of Tamil Nadu Conviction for murder not proved beyond reasonable doubt-Appeal against conviction allowed, Benefit of doubt granted to the appellant-The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against conviction of the appellant on the ground that the prosecution had failed to prove the allegation of murd [LexDoc Id : 331573]
SC 2008
Steel Authority of India Ltd. vs Panchu Behera and 208 Ors. [LexDoc Id : 370675]
HC (Orissa) 2008
Anil Motilal Nimbhore vs State of Maharashtra and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 353335]
HC (Bombay) 2008
Kamaljeet Kaur vs State of Punjab and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 352828]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2008
Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation vs Deputy Labour Commissioner and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 349943]
HC (Karnataka) 2008
Pramod Narayan Bandekar and Anr. vs State of Maharashtra [LexDoc Id : 349363]
HC (Bombay) 2008
 
First | Prev | 231 | 232 | 233 | 234 | 235 | 236 | 237 | 238 | 239 | 240 | Next | Last