| First | Prev | 231 | 232 | 233 | 234 | 235 | 236 | 237 | 238 | 239 | 240 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 5976 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Agrawal Duplex Board Mills vs CTT
[LexDoc Id : 355102]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2008 |
Probal Gupta vs Burdwan Central Co-op. Bank Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 351818]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2008 |
Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigam Ltd. vs Allabaksh
[LexDoc Id : 350872]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2008 |
Landes bank Badenwurttemberg vs Nova Petrochemicals Ltd.
Sanction of scheme of arrangement-Clubbing of interested and independent creditors-An application objecting clubbing of interested creditors-promoters of the respondent-company with independent creditors in a meeting of unsecured cre [LexDoc Id : 345660]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2008 |
Lalita Anil Shete and Anr. vs Padmavati Mahila Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadeet and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 342971]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Gwalior Rayon and Silk Mfg. (Weaving) Co. Ltd. vs Nawab Khan
[LexDoc Id : 340494]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2008 |
V. Sukumar and Ors. vs Srivari Mutual Benefit Finance Ltd. and Ors.
Statutory right of shareholders-Access to company records-The shareholder's statutory right to claim copies of the concerned company records, could not be enforced against the legal heirs of a deceased direct [LexDoc Id : 338232]
|
CLB |
2008 |
Yatindra Jit Singh vs National Stock Exchange of India Ltd., SEBI, Essar Steel Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 335664]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2008 |
Yatindra Jit Singh vs Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd., SEBI, Essar Steel Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 335663]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2008 |
Gunjan Sharma vs Ashutosh Sharma and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 335346]
|
SC |
2008 |
Anju Sharma vs Bhavuk Sharma
[LexDoc Id : 335335]
|
SC |
2008 |
Tamil Nadu Housing Board and Ors. vs Sea Shore Apartments Owners Welfare Association
Fixation of price-Commissions obliged to consider the controversy on facts and circumstances-The State Commission as well as the National Commission was obliged to consider whether the controversy raised in the proceedings with regard to fixat [LexDoc Id : 331766]
|
SC |
2008 |
Suryalakshmi Cotton Mills Ltd. vs Rajvir Industries Ltd. and Ors.
Quashing of FIR alleging dishonour of cheques-Commission of cognisable offence, Court not to interfere with investigation-It was the duty of the court to uphold and/or to protect the personal liberty of an accused in a case. However, where the first information report (FI [LexDoc Id : 331765]
|
SC |
2008 |
Surinder Shukla vs UOI and Ors.
Power of judicial review-Extent of permissibility-Judicial review was permissible only to the extent of finding whether the process in reaching decision had been observed correctly and not the decisio [LexDoc Id : 331764]
|
SC |
2008 |
S.K. Dua vs State of Haryana and Anr.
Interest for delayed payment of retrial benefits-Retiral benefits not in the nature of bounty-The retrial benefits, not being in the nature of bounty, the appellant employee was entitled as of right to get those benefits immediately after super [LexDoc Id : 331760]
|
SC |
2008 |
Mazhar Hassan vs Gangu Singh and Ors.
Ownership by adverse possession-Failure to prove continuous possession of property-
The Supreme Court restored the orders passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation and Consolidation Officer and held that if a party claiming adv [LexDoc Id : 331758]
|
SC |
2008 |
State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors. vs Madhukar Rao
Powers of Magistrate-S.39(1)(d) not to be used against exercise of Magisterial power-Any attempt to operationalise s.39(1)(d) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act 1972 merely on the basis of seizure and accusations or allegations levelled [LexDoc Id : 331757]
|
SC |
2008 |
Kanhaiyalal vs UOI
Legality of confession before an officer-Conviction on the basis of confessional statement-An ‘officer’ for the purposes of s.67 read with s.42 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 was not a ‘police officer’ and hence a [LexDoc Id : 331756]
|
SC |
2008 |
K.S. Krishna Sarma vs Kifayat Ali
Impleadment of legal representatives-Leading of fresh evidence only by newly impleaded represantative-The Supreme Court held that when a legal representative of deceased wais impleaded, the earlier party could not be permitted to lead fresh evidence on [LexDoc Id : 331755]
|
SC |
2008 |
Sanjeev Trading Co. vs CTT
[LexDoc Id : 406591]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2008 |
Ramanand Electro Coats vs State of Kerala
[LexDoc Id : 368682]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2008 |
Jagdev Prasad Bajaj and Ors. vs Tirrihanah Co. Ltd.
Winding up: Inability pay debts-Non-appearance of company in spite of service-In an application filed by the petitioner under s.433, s.434 and s.439 of the Companies Act 1956, the high court noted that for the price of goods, so [LexDoc Id : 359971]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2008 |
K. Pon Venkatesh and Anr. vs Employees' State Insurance Corporation
[LexDoc Id : 359424]
|
HC (Madras) |
2008 |
Anil Chotulal Sharma and Dhanraj @ Dhananjay Anandrao Kulkarni vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 353334]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
K.S.E.B. vs Mohan Kumar
[LexDoc Id : 350169]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2008 |
| |
| First | Prev | 231 | 232 | 233 | 234 | 235 | 236 | 237 | 238 | 239 | 240 | Next | Last |
| |
