Register free!

Banking - Judgement [ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950 1949 1948 1947 1946 1945 1944 1943 1942 1941 1940 1939 1938 1937 1936 1935 1934 1933 1932 1931 1930 1929 1928 1927 1926 1925 1924 1923 1922 1921 1920 1919 1918 1917 1915 1914 1902 1900 1896 Select Court HC SC Others   First | Prev | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | Next | Last Documents Found: 2418    Title Forum  Year Vinod Rathore vs UOI and Ors. Collection of Tax at Source-Computation of TCS-The cost of liquor would include the excise duty paid by the assessee for computing tax collection at source. S.206C of the Income Tax Act [LexDoc Id : 261601] Madhya Pradesh HC 2005 K.R. Muralidhar vs LIC of India [LexDoc Id : 240185] Karnataka HC 2005 Shams Tabrez Vanti, In re [LexDoc Id : 237472] AAR 2005 Salora International Ltd. vs Addl. CIT [LexDoc Id : 263599] ITAT Delhi 2005 CIT vs Globe Sales Corpn. Penalty for concealment-Recording of satisfaction by A.O.-A.Y.1992-93: A penalty for concealment of income under s.271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act 1961 could not be levied on the assessee since the AO had not [LexDoc Id : 263361] Delhi HC 2005 CIT vs Raza Buland Sugar Co. Trading receipt or income-Excess sale price of sugar-AY 1974-75 – 1976-77. The amount realised by the assessee, a manufacturer and seller of sugar, on sale price of sugar, in excess of the levy price fix [LexDoc Id : 303512] HC (Allahabad) 2005 CIT vs Chittarmal Ram Dayal Interest paid to partners-Partners in representative capacity-AY 1983-84. The interest paid by the assessee on deposits made by some partners, who were the representative partners of their respective HUFs, in the [LexDoc Id : 301184] HC (Allahabad) 2005 S.C. Wadhwa vs CIT and Anr. Appeal to the High Court-Deduction of expenses against incentive bonus-A.Y. 1993-94: An appeal against the Tribunal's order did not lie before the high court because no substantial question of law arose from that order. T [LexDoc Id : 283616] Punjab and Haryana HC 2005 CIT vs S.C. Wadhwa Standard deduction from salary income-Expenditure incurred on earning incentive bonus-AY 1986-87: The incentive bonus received by the assessee was required to be considered as a part of his salary and therefore, the expenses incurred by [LexDoc Id : 282444] Punjab and Haryana HC 2005 CIT vs Gobind Ram Penalty for delay in filing of audit report-Validity of penalty-AY 1990-91: The penalty under s.271B of the Incoem Tax Act 1961 could be levied only if the assessee had not obtained the audit report within the pres [LexDoc Id : 282221] Punjab and Haryana HC 2005 CIT vs Pawan Rice Mills Penalty-Delay in filing returns-A.Y 1990 -91:The penalty under s.271B of the Income Tax Act 1961 was set aside. Although the assessee had delayed in filing its return, it had audited [LexDoc Id : 281086] Punjab and Haryana HC 2005 CIT vs Palwal Co-op Sugar Mills Ltd. Duty of Tribunal-Passing a reasoned order-All judicial and quasi-judicial authorities were required to pass a reasoned order that reflected an application of mind to the issues raised before s [LexDoc Id : 280927] Punjab and Haryana HC 2005 Actia Technologies (P) Ltd. vs Canara Bank [LexDoc Id : 280710] Karnataka HC 2005 Shalini and Ors. vs Shanker Neelanth Iyer Transfer of Property-Oral agreement for transfer-A suit for specific performance based on an oral agreement for transfer of immovable property was maintainable. [LexDoc Id : 262721] Bombay HC 2005 CIT vs Gupta Fabs [LexDoc Id : 240479] HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2005 CIT vs Madan Lal and Bros. [LexDoc Id : 240004] Punjab and Haryana HC 2005 DCIT vs Sardar Exhibitors (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 239952] ITAT Delhi 2005 CIT and Anr. vs Protectron Electronics (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 237854] Karnataka HC 2005 Chetak Enterprises (P) Ltd. vs ACIT [LexDoc Id : 236568] ITAT Jodhpur 2005 DCIT vs Subhash Chand Vij Computation of undisclosed income-Unexplained investment-Block period 1 April 1986 to 6 March 1997. During the search an agreement to sell was found which indicated that assessee had agreed to purchase an Or [LexDoc Id : 324979] ITAT (Chandigarh) 2005 Krishna Keshav Laboratories Ltd. vs CIT Business expenditure-Duty of the Tribunal-AY 1982-83. The assessee company’s claim that the expenditure incurred in obtaining a plot of land on lease with a building and its subsequent modific [LexDoc Id : 291629] HC (Gujarat) 2005 CIT vs Haryana Minerals Ltd. Deduction: Export business-Export of minerals-AY 1984-85. The assessee extracted and exported cut and polished minerals. It was not entitled to deduction under s.80HHC of the Income Tax Act 1961 s [LexDoc Id : 287453] HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2005 ACWT vs H.R. Virmani Valuation of rented property-Valuation on yield basis-AY 1991-92, 1992-93. Valuation of leased property by the rental or yield method was appropriate where the lessee continued to pay rent and be in posse [LexDoc Id : 287255] ITAT Delhi 2005 Krishna Keshav Laboratories Ltd. vs CIT [LexDoc Id : 279053] Gujarat HC 2005 CIT vs S.L.M. Maneklal Industries Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 240307] HC (Gujarat) 2005   First | Prev | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | Next | Last