Register free!

Banking - Judgement [ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950 1949 1948 1947 1946 1945 1944 1943 1942 1941 1940 1939 1938 1937 1936 1935 1934 1933 1932 1931 1930 1929 1928 1927 1926 1925 1924 1923 1922 1921 1920 1919 1918 1917 1915 1914 1902 1900 1896 Select Court HC SC Others   First | Prev | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | Next | Last Documents Found: 2418    Title Forum  Year CIT vs Saurashtra Cement and Chemical Industries Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 240081] Gujarat HC 2005 Vishal S. Ruia vs ITO [LexDoc Id : 239957] ITAT Mumbai 2005 Murlidhar Kanoi vs DCIT [LexDoc Id : 239573] ITAT Calcutta 2005 CIT vs Giriraj Udyog (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 239308] Allahabad HC 2005 Dang and Co. (P) Ltd. vs DCIT Undisclosed Income - Advance received from customers - The impugned loan amount could not be treated as undisclosed income and could not be added u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act 1961, as it appeared to be an ... [LexDoc Id : 238953] ITAT (Delhi) 2005 CIT vs Dinesh Kumar Reference to High Court-Finding of Tribunal: Cash seized explained-AY 1986-87. Certain cash was found from assessee’s premises during search. The Tribunal held that the cash found was explained. No question of law aro [LexDoc Id : 337549] HC (Madhya Pradesh) 2005 Rai Saheb Rekhchand Mohota Spg. and Wvg. Mills Ltd. vs DCIT Business expenditure-Foreign education expenses of MD’s son-AY 1989-90, 1990-91. The expenses incurred by the assessee company for sending the son of its managing director abroad for higher education could not [LexDoc Id : 288075] ITAT Mumbai 2005 CIT vs Chaudhry Cotton Ginning and Pressing Factory False estimate of advance tax-Bona fide estimate-No penalty under s.273 of the Income Tax Act 1961 could be levied on the assessee since at the time of filing its estimate of advance tax, it could no [LexDoc Id : 279735] Punjab and Haryana HC 2005 Council of Institute of Chartered Accountants of India vs Y.M. Mansuri [LexDoc Id : 279050] HC (Gujarat) 2005 CIT vs Mangha Ram Om Prakash [LexDoc Id : 279037] HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2005 ACIT vs Vellammal Education Trust [LexDoc Id : 278963] ITAT Chennai 2005 Ambica Oil and General Mills vs ITO and AO [LexDoc Id : 240119] HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2005 Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. vs DCIT [LexDoc Id : 239954] ITAT Mumbai 2005 CIT vs Brij Bala Validity of revision by CIT-Revision of summary assessment-A.Y.1983-84 to 85-86. Summary assessment orders passed under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 could not be set aside by the CIT under section [LexDoc Id : 238995] Allahabad HC 2005 CWT vs D.N. Bhargava Exemption from wealth tax-Share of interest from an industrial undertaking-AY 1982-83. The assessee was a partner in a firm. Since the firm was an industrial undertaking, the investment made by the assessee in the firm was ex [LexDoc Id : 306934] HC (Allahabad) 2005 CWT vs Sidh Gopal Kapoor Valuation of Residential house-Co-owner- AY 1973-74 – 1977-78. The assessee HUF was the co-owner of a house having half share, which was occupied by the respondent for residential purposes. [LexDoc Id : 302458] HC (Allahabad) 2005 Nirman Textile Mills (P) Ltd. vs ACIT Duty of Tribunal-Passing a reasoned order-AY 1991-92. The Tribunal was duty bound to pass a reasoned or a speaking order particularly while reversing the CIT(A)’s order. S.254 of th [LexDoc Id : 298388] HC (Gujarat) 2005 CIT vs Sethi Wires (P) Ltd. Business Income-Power subsidy-The Tribunal could not hold the power subsidy received as the assessee’s capital receipt without examining the entire scheme of subsidy. S. [LexDoc Id : 295388] HC (Madhya Pradesh) 2005 ITO vs Jyoti Prakash Chhabria and Ors. Unexplained cash credits and expenditure-Sale of jewellery declared under VDIS-AY 1998-99, 1999-2000. No addition to the assessee’s income could be made under s.68 of the Income Tax Act 1961 for unexplained commission paid by her [LexDoc Id : 287704] ITAT Mumbai 2005 CWT vs Masood Halim Valuation of Assets-Valuation of residential house-A.Y. 1974-75: The value of the residential house that the assessee, was required to be determined as per Rule 1BB of the Wealth Tax Rules 1957. [LexDoc Id : 281672] Allahabad HC 2005 CIT vs Electra (I) Ltd. Remuneration of Director-Perquisites in excess of one-fifth of salary-A.Y. 1982-83: The amount paid to the directors of the assessee-company by way of perquisites, could not be disallowed under s.40A(5)(c) of the Income [LexDoc Id : 281668] Allahabad HC 2005 ACIT vs Nestle (I) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 239934] ITAT (Delhi) 2005 CWT vs Meerut Race Club Wealth tax assessment of AOP-Law applicable-AY 1977-78. No assessment under the Wealth Tax Act 1957 could be made in case of an AOP prior to the insertion of s.21AA of the Act, which was effecti [LexDoc Id : 308719] HC (Allahabad) 2005 Alex Joseph vs Madhavan Nair [LexDoc Id : 295752] SC 2005 CIT vs New Kashmir Oriental Transport Co. (P) Ltd. Interest on borrowed capital-Adjustment of outstanding hiring charges-AY 1972-73 – 1975-76. The deduction of interest payable by the assessee company on loans borrowed from a firm for its business was allowable without a [LexDoc Id : 295325] HC (Allahabad) 2005   First | Prev | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | Next | Last