Register free!

Banking - Judgement [ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950 1949 1948 1947 1946 1945 1944 1943 1942 1941 1940 1939 1938 1937 1936 1935 1934 1933 1932 1931 1930 1929 1928 1927 1926 1925 1924 1923 1922 1921 1920 1919 1918 1917 1915 1914 1902 1900 1896 Select Court HC SC Others   First | Prev | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | Next | Last Documents Found: 2418    Title Forum  Year Mini Muthoottu Mutual Funds Ltd. vs ACIT Business loss: Commercial expediency-Interest free advances to sister concern-The assessee company had given interest free advances to its sister concerns to overcome their financial crisis and to retain its business reputation [LexDoc Id : 293337] ITAT (Bangalore) 2005 CIT vs Khan and Sirohi Steel Rolling Mills Unexplained investment-Discrepancy in stock-AY 1979-80. No addition to the assessee’s income could be made since it had been satisfactorily explained that the value of the stock hypothecated to [LexDoc Id : 288902] Allahabad HC 2005 ICICI Bank Ltd. vs Official Liquidator Winding-up-Claim of secured creditor-The claim of a secured creditor prevailed over the claims made by income-tax and sales tax departments; however, the distribution of sale proceeds cou [LexDoc Id : 284930] Chennai HC 2005 CWT vs Jitendra Kumar (HUF) Status of HUF or Individual-Share income from firm-The share income earned by a member of a HUF from his firm was his individual income. It was not assessable as income of his HUF. This view was in ke [LexDoc Id : 283601] Allahabad HC 2005 S.S. Sheriff vs State of Kerala and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 282008] Kerala HC 2005 Indo Lahari Bio Power Ltd. vs ACIT Revision u/s 263-Validity of revision-AY 1999-2000: The CIT was not justified in setting aside the AO's order, as the order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interests of the Re [LexDoc Id : 281875] ITAT Nagpur 2005 Shakti Sugars Ltd. vs CIT Agricultural development allowance-Eligibility-AY 1983-84: The assessee, a sugar manufacturer, was not entitled to weighted deduction under s.35C of the Income Tax Act 1961 in respect of the expens [LexDoc Id : 281779] Chennai HC 2005 CIT vs Ashoka Dairy [LexDoc Id : 280574] Punjab and Haryana HC 2005 Chief CIT and Anr. vs Ganesh Das and Son (P) Ltd. Advance Tax-Tax paid before end of financial year-AY 1980-81: Advance tax that had been paid beyond the due date prescribed under s.211 of the Income Tax Act 1961 but before the end of the relevant fi [LexDoc Id : 280062] Allahabad HC 2005 CIT vs Hukam Singh Validity of reassessment-Service of notice on legal representatives-A.Y. 1979-80 to 1985-86: The reassessment was valid, as the failure to raise objection for not furnishing notice amounted to a mere irregularity. Ther [LexDoc Id : 279033] Punjab and Haryana HC 2005 Godavari Devi Agrawal vs JCIT [LexDoc Id : 278965] ITAT Nagpur 2005 Rakesh M. Kanungo vs ITO [LexDoc Id : 263597] ITAT Mumbai 2005 Elel Hotels and Investments Ltd. vs JCIT [LexDoc Id : 263588] ITAT Mumbai 2005 CIT vs Modi Electric Supply Co. Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 261596] Punjab and Haryana HC 2005 CIT vs Vikas Promoters (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 239161] Delhi HC 2005 Sakthi Sugars Ltd. vs CIT [LexDoc Id : 238223] Chennai HC 2005 CIT vs Jitendra Kumar (HUF) Individual vs HUF-Property received on partition of HUF-AY 1981-82 – 1983-84. The assessee, a coparcener, had received certain amount when he was a minor on due to partition of his HUF and invested the same [LexDoc Id : 302795] HC (Allahabad) 2005 CIT vs Amrit Foods (P) Ltd. Adventure in the nature of trade-Purchase and resale of plant-A.Y. 1974-75: The profits derived from sale of plant, which was purchased in 1969 and sold in 1974, was business profit arising out of an adventure in [LexDoc Id : 284683] Allahabad HC 2005 Diwan Singh (HUF) vs CIT Unexplained investment-Unexplained jewellery, burden of proof-AY 1975-76: The assessee had failed to discharge its burden of proving that the jewellery and silver articles that had been found at his premises duri [LexDoc Id : 282819] Allahabad HC 2005 CIT vs Swadeshi Mining and Mfg. Co. Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 281673] Allahabad HC 2005 CIT vs Rama Motors [LexDoc Id : 280947] Punjab and Haryana HC 2005 Suneel Darshan vs ITO [LexDoc Id : 263602] ITAT Mumbai 2005 Maker Chambers V. Premises Co-op. Society Ltd. vs ITO [LexDoc Id : 263596] ITAT Mumbai 2005 New Cawnpore Flour Mills vs CIT [LexDoc Id : 262031] Allahabad HC 2005 Jindal Leasefin Ltd. vs ACIT [LexDoc Id : 261960] ITAT Delhi 2005   First | Prev | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | Next | Last