Register free! 
Banking - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 2648   
Title Forum  Year
Mangilal Agarwal (Dead) through L.Rs. vs ACIT Unexplained valuables-Onus to prove ownership of seized gold-AY 1988-89. The value of seized gold could not be assessed in the assessee’s hands, as its explanation that the seized gold belonged to certain person [LexDoc Id : 317823]
HC (Rajasthan) 2006
I.I.T. Investrust Ltd. vs ITO Speculation loss-Loss on valuation of shares held as stock-in-trade-The loss suffered by the assessee on account of valuation of closing stock of shares was allowable as speculation loss since the shares were held as s [LexDoc Id : 316690]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2006
CIT vs Modern Farm Services Remission by liability-Credit balance in Post Warranty Service Scheme-AY 1978-79. The assessee was a dealer in tractors. As per the Post Warranty Service Scheme adopted by it, certain amounts received by it under the Sch [LexDoc Id : 309740]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2006
Punjab State Co-op. Agricultural Development Bank Ltd. vs CIT and Anr. Validity of reassessment proceedings-Later Supreme Court judgment-AY 1999-2000. The notice issued for reassessment on the basis of Supreme Court’s judgment, which specified that exemption of interest income was not a [LexDoc Id : 309540]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2006
Universal Subscription Agency (P) Ltd. vs JCIT Validity of notice for reassessment-Change of opinion, Notice after four years-AY 1992-93 – 1994-95. The assessee’s claim for deduction under s.80-O of the Income Tax Act 1961 was accepted on the basis of details furnished by him [LexDoc Id : 308169]
HC (Allahabad) 2006
State of Punjab and Anr. vs Balkaran Singh [LexDoc Id : 302743]
SC 2006
State of Kerala vs Athulya Liquors [LexDoc Id : 368685]
HC (Kerala) 2006
CIT vs Eicher Motors Ltd. Appeal to High court-Tribunal following Supreme court's order-Where the Tribunal had decided the issue following Supreme court's order, no substantial question of law arose, since issue was no longer debatable.LexDoc Id : 326380]
HC (Madhya Pradesh) 2006
ITO vs Janta Bazar and Stores (P) Ltd. Ownership of property-Property allotted to shareholders, Device to evade payment of tax-AY 1989-90 to 1995-96. The assessee was a company. Certain property was purchased by its members and was transferred to the company in 1977. No paymen [LexDoc Id : 324502]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2006
C. Regraj vs Bank of Rajasthan Enforcement of security interest-Writ petition-A writ petition filed against a possession notice issued under s.13(4) of the SARFAESI Act 2002 was dismissed because there was an alternative remedy [LexDoc Id : 316364]
HC (Chennai) 2006
CIT vs Apcom Computers (P) Ltd. Undisclosed Income-Inflated stock statement given to bank-AY 1991-92. The assessee had filed an inflated stock statement to the bank for obtaining higher loan and credit facility. Since the value was given on [LexDoc Id : 304773]
HC (Chennai) 2006
Sahara India Financial Corpn. Ltd. vs CIT and ACIT Directions for special audit under s.142(2A)-Opportunity to assessee-AY 2003-04. An opportunity of hearing to the assessee was not necessary if the material on record clearly showed the necessity of special audit. In ca [LexDoc Id : 303121]
HC (Delhi) 2006
Radhas Printers (Corrugated) vs State of Kerala [LexDoc Id : 368684]
HC (Kerala) 2006
Munjal Sales Corpn. vs CIT and Anr. Part disallowance of business expenses-Telephone expenses: Telephones at partners residence-The disallowance of expenses at one seventh as agreed to by parties in AY 1994-95 was to be upheld.

S.37(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 [LexDoc Id : 335821]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2006
Moti Lal Padampat Udyog Ltd. vs CIT Remission of liability-Sales tax refund received- AY 1980-81. The sales tax paid by the assessee in the years 1971-72 to 1980-81 had been refunded to it during the AY 1980-81. Therefore, the refund [LexDoc Id : 321612]
HC (Allahabad) 2006
T.A. Abdul Khader vs CWT Penalty: Late filing of return of wealth-Effect of defective notice-AY 1983-84 – 1986-87. The omission to exclude s.14(2) or s.17 of the Wealth Tax Act 1957 from the notice issued under s.18(2) of the Act did not inval [LexDoc Id : 317824]
HC (Kerala) 2006
Muthoot Bankers vs DCIT Business expenditure-Construction of strong room in rented building-The expenses incurred by the assessee in constructing a strong room in a rented building were allowable as business expenditure.

S.37(1) of [LexDoc Id : 315651]
ITAT (Cochin) 2006
Saraswathi Electronics vs ITO Penalty: Delay in obtaining audit report-Reasonable cause- AY 1991-92 – 1994-95. The non-availability of accounts clerk for regular writing of the books of accounts, the ignorance regarding audit and filing [LexDoc Id : 309435]
HC (Karnataka) 2006
Chanchal Katyal vs CIT Interest on borrowed capital-Funds borrowed on interest not diverted towards advance-AY 1980-81. The proportionate interest on funds borrowed on interest by the assessee could not be disallowed since the interest was not diverted towar [LexDoc Id : 309232]
HC (Allahabad) 2006
ACIT vs Kalyan Mitra Trust Exemption: Income of a charitable trust-Letting out wedding hall-AY 2002-03. The assessee was a charitable trust registered under s.12A of the Income Tax Act 1961 and was also approved under s.80G of the Act. Its in [LexDoc Id : 309107]
ITAT (Delhi) 2006
Emar Hotels and Investments (P) Ltd. vs TRO and Ors. Maintainability of writ petition-Order passed in recovery proceedings-The writ petition filed against the order of the Tax Recovery Officer attaching the property and rent thereof was not maintainable since an alternate [LexDoc Id : 308861]
HC (Bombay) 2006
M.R. Singhal vs ACIT Computation of undisclosed income-Non-filing of returns before due date-AY 1994-95, 1995-96. The consequence of non-filing of return by the due date under s.139(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 could not be nullified by filin [LexDoc Id : 305494]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2006
Munjal Sales Corpn. vs CIT [LexDoc Id : 303909]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2006
Sony India (P) Ltd. vs CBDT International transactions: CBDT’s instructions-Determination of arm’s length price-AY 2002-03. The Finance Act 2001 had introduced new sections in the Income Tax Act 1961 to enable the AO to determine arm’s length price in case of in [LexDoc Id : 303534]
HC (Delhi) 2006
Suresh Sunderrao Nayak vs M.K. Pandey, DIT (Exemption) [LexDoc Id : 303037]
HC (Bombay) 2006
 
First | Prev | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | Next | Last