Register free!

Banking - Judgement [ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950 1949 1948 1947 1946 1945 1944 1943 1942 1941 1940 1939 1938 1937 1936 1935 1934 1933 1932 1931 1930 1929 1928 1927 1926 1925 1924 1923 1922 1921 1920 1919 1918 1917 1915 1914 1902 1900 1896 Select Court HC SC Others   First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last Documents Found: 2648    Title Forum  Year ACIT vs Cascade Enterprises [LexDoc Id : 316530] ITAT (Delhi) 2006 ACIT vs Heera Lal Validity of order of special audit-Non-mention of date for filing special audit report-The orders under s.142(2A) of the Income Tax Act 1961 were invalid, as the directions to the assessee for submitting a special audit report were issue [LexDoc Id : 308355] ITAT (Jaipur) 2006 Dresdner Bank AG vs Addl. CIT Expenses relating to exempt income-Duty of AO-The AO was duty bound to identify the expenses relating to exempt income for the purpose of disallowance under s.14A of the Income Tax Act 1961. LexDoc Id : 304021] ITAT (Mumbai) 2006 ITO vs Laxminarayana Asranna and Vice Versa Right of assessee-New ground before the Tribunal-The assessee could take the new ground before the Tribunal that his income from the temple was that of his HUF's and not his, since there could be [LexDoc Id : 335825] ITAT (Bangalore) 2006 Suraj Auto Service Center vs ITO Validity of: Re-assessment proceedings-Change of opinion-AY 2002-03. In original assessment, the AO had accepted the gross receipt from contract after applying his mind on assessee's explanation. The re-open [LexDoc Id : 327961] ITAT (Jodhpur) 2006 Dinabandhu Pal vs ITO Penalty: Concealment of income-Inability to produce cash creditors-The assessee had filed confirmation from creditors. The confirmations filed were not fake. He has substantiated his explanation and no penalty could b [LexDoc Id : 326289] ITAT (Calcutta) 2006 Raj Kumar Pokharna vs DCIT Unexplained investment-Investment in construction of property-AY 1994-95. A diary found during the course of survey showed that an amount of Rs.64,841 was spent by the assessee on construction of a boundary wall [LexDoc Id : 322186] ITAT (Jodhpur) 2006 Rajasthan Commercial House vs DCIT Rectification of mistake-Deduction allowable but not claimed in return-AY 1997-98. The assessee’s claim for deduction of sales tax payable in the AY 1995-96 was disallowed on the ground that it was hit by s.43B of the Inc [LexDoc Id : 321515] ITAT (Jodhpur) 2006 BSES Ltd. vs DCIT TDS on salaries-Reimbursement of vehicle expenses to employees-AY 1998-99 – 2002-03. The assessee, while deducting tax at source under s.192 of the Income Tax Act 1961, did not include the payment of reimbursement [LexDoc Id : 320209] ITAT (Mumbai) 2006 Punjab and Sind Bank vs DCIT Maintainability of appeal to High Court-Appeal by PSU-AY 1995-96. The appellant bank was a public sector undertaking. Since prior approval from the Committee on Disputes was not obtained for filing an app [LexDoc Id : 318864] HC (Delhi) 2006 IAC and Ors. vs Saurashtra Trust Charitable Trust-Business income-AY 1984-85 – 1986-87, 1990-91. The assessee trust was entitled to exemption under s.11 of the Income Tax Act 1961 because its activities were in the n [LexDoc Id : 318031] ITAT (Mumbai) 2006 John Tinson and Co. (P) Ltd. vs CIT Annual letting value-Computation-The AO was duty bound to compute the annual letting value of the assessee’s property, let out at a monthly rent, on standard rent basis whether fixed [LexDoc Id : 304153] HC (Delhi) 2006 R. Sundararajan vs State by D.S.P., SPE, CBI [LexDoc Id : 303635] SC 2006 Rashmi Mishra vs Madhya Pradesh Public Service Comission and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 303634] SC 2006 Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan and Ors. vs. Sajal Kumar Roy and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 303076] SC 2006 Sankar Deb Acharya and Ors. vs Biswanath Chakraborty and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 302999] SC 2006 Prithipal Singh vs State of Punjab and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 302998] SC 2006 Suresh Pathrella vs Oriental Bank of Commerce [LexDoc Id : 302919] SC 2006 Union of India and Anr. vs S.D. Bandhopadhyay and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 302910] SC 2006 UOI and Ors. vs B. Valluvan and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 302904] SC 2006 Lalit Hosiery vs UOI and Ors. Block assessment: levy of surcharge-Law applicable-Block Period: 1 April 1990 to 24 May 2000. The surcharge in case of block assessment was leviable as per Finance Act 2000 even where the search took [LexDoc Id : 358480] HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2006 Naranjan Singh vs ITO Rectification of mistake-Mistake coming into existence after appeal order-AY 1992-93 and AY 1995-96. At the time of filing return for assessment year 1992-93 the assessee did not claim set off of unabsorbed depreciation sinc [LexDoc Id : 330165] HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2006 Kerala State Industrial Development Corpn. Ltd. vs Addl. CIT and Anr. Charging of interest: Payment of Advance tax-Delay in payment of: Self-assessment tax, Date of payment: last date being a holiday-AY 1997-98. The tax under s.140A was payable upto 30 November 1997, which was a holiday. The tax was paid on the next working day. No interest under [LexDoc Id : 327311] HC (Kerala) 2006 IIT Investrust Ltd. vs ITO [LexDoc Id : 324397] ITAT (Mumbai) 2006 CIT vs Hoshiari Lal Kewal Krishan Business expenditure-Fine paid for belated payment-AY 1976-77. The fine paid by the assessee for belated payment of excise duty, being in the nature of compensation, was deductible as business expendit [LexDoc Id : 319277] HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2006   First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last