| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 3219 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Arun B. Khanjire vs Ichalkaranji Urban Co-op. Bank Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 351459]
|
SC |
2008 |
Rotomac Globals (P) Ltd. vs CIT
Business expenditure-Perks to Director of Company-Estimate of perk value, Payments in respect of electricity etc of Director's house-AY 2000-2001 and 2002-2003. The assessee company had spent money in respect of electricity, telephone and watchman at Director's residence. The house [LexDoc Id : 392813]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2008 |
Vijay Gupta vs State of Raj. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 376123]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2008 |
Sunita Choudhary vs State and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 375563]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2008 |
CIT vs K.P. Chandradasan
Computation of undisclosed income-Deduction claimed in return filed after search-Block Period: 1 April 1986 to 5 March 1997. The assessee had already filed the return for AY 1995-96. After search it filed a revised return declaring [LexDoc Id : 372135]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2008 |
Glaxosmithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 356712]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2008 |
DCIT vs Arundhati Traders (P) Ltd.
Book Profits: Computation of Minimum Alternate Tax assessment-Capital gains-AY 2003-04. The assessee company had held certain units of a mutual fund as investment. The capital gains on sale of those unit could not be added to [LexDoc Id : 356606]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2008 |
Management of Chief Engineer vs Its Workmen
[LexDoc Id : 355974]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2008 |
New Shailaja CHS Ltd. vs ITO
Capital gains-Transfer of Additional FSI-AY 2003-04. The assessee society had acquired land with building in 1972. In 1991 it became entitled to additional FSI of 11000 sq feet, under revised [LexDoc Id : 355422]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2008 |
CIT vs Contimeters Electricals (P) Ltd.
Validity of revisional order by CIT-Issue not raised in show cause notice-In proceedings under s.263, CIT could not revise the AO's order on an issue which was not part of show cause notice issued to the assessee.
[LexDoc Id : 352616]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2008 |
Nehru Shikshan Sanstha and Ors. vs Shobha Karve and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 351468]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Sreenivas and Co. vs State of Tamil Nadu
[LexDoc Id : 406545]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2008 |
DCIT vs K. Natarajan
Penalty: Search cases-Penalty: Concealment of income, Unaccounted sales-AY 1999-2000 to AY 2004-05. During the search under s.132, certain documents were found showing undisclosed sales which were also admitted in the stat [LexDoc Id : 375601]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2008 |
Shahjad Ahmad Khan vs District and Sessions Judge and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 374826]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2008 |
P.P. Menon vs CIT
Short term vs Long term capital gains-Period of holding, Assets acquired on dissolution of firm-AY 2002-03. A building was owned by a firm in which the assessee was a partner. On dissolution of firm on 15 April 2001, the said building was taken o [LexDoc Id : 373655]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2008 |
Akhedan vs Panchayat Raj Deptt. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 373168]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2008 |
Sundaram BNP Paribas Home Finance Ltd. vs State of Kerala and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 361974]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2008 |
Modern India Ltd. vs DCIT
Penalty: Concealment of income-Dis-allowance of expenses claimed-AY 1996-97 and 1997-98. The assessee had claimed that he had paid Rs.1.30 crores to 'R' for buying a property in possession of 'R' and had paid an ear [LexDoc Id : 357596]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2008 |
Visalakshy Kumaran vs CIT
[LexDoc Id : 355564]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2008 |
ITO vs Intop Software Inc.
[LexDoc Id : 355421]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2008 |
Jaipal Jain, Shobha Jain, Tarun Jain and Amit Jain vs AA, UOI and National Building Corporation
[LexDoc Id : 353788]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Harish Kanayalal Thawani, Shobha Harish Thawani, Jaya Dungershi, Kishore Dungershi Shah, Pratap Dungershi Shah and Hiren Dungershi Shah vs S.C. Prasad, W. Hasan, C.M. Betgeri, A.K. Behera and UOI
Belated filing of audit report-Deduction under s.10A-Belated filing of audit report
Deduction under s.10A
The deduction under s.10A or under s.10B could not be denied even if the requisite audit repor [LexDoc Id : 352677]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Anganwadi Workers and Helpers Union vs State of Manipur and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 351458]
|
SC |
2008 |
Mohindra Hire Purchase vs Jarnail Singh
[LexDoc Id : 351152]
|
SC |
2008 |
DCIT vs Emeskay Financial Services Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 384198]
|
ITAT (Vishakapatnam) |
2008 |
| |
| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| |
