Register free!

Banking - Judgement [ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950 1949 1948 1947 1946 1945 1944 1943 1942 1941 1940 1939 1938 1937 1936 1935 1934 1933 1932 1931 1930 1929 1928 1927 1926 1925 1924 1923 1922 1921 1920 1919 1918 1917 1915 1914 1902 1900 1896 Select Court HC SC Others   First | Prev | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | Last Documents Found: 3219    Title Forum  Year ICICI Bank Ltd. vs Lakshminarayanan [LexDoc Id : 331194] HC (Chennai) 2008 Punjab National Bank vs CIT Interest-Compensation received by RBI-A.Y.1981-1982 to 1983-1984. The assessee bank gave loan at lower rate of interest to exporters. the compensation paid by RBI for loss of interest was [LexDoc Id : 408965] HC (Delhi) 2008 CIT and Anr. vs Kirtivan D. Kotian Perk-Benefit to employee-Shares allotted to employee at less than market price-AY 1996-1997. The assessee was allotted shares by his employer company at less than market price. It was a benefit drawn from employment. The differen [LexDoc Id : 392815] HC (Karnataka) 2008 ACIT vs Brooke Bond Lipton India Ltd. Salary-Perk-Reimbursement of: Club Membership Fee-The assessee re-imbursed the club membership fee paid to obtain corporate membership of the club. It claimed this was taken for its business benefit. [LexDoc Id : 392700] HC (Karnataka) 2008 CIT and Anr. vs Land Development Corpn. Validity of assessment-No opportunity to cross examine witnesses-AY 1996-97. After processing the return under s.143(1) a survey under s.133A was conducted. During the survey it was found that the assessee had made [LexDoc Id : 372994] HC (Karnataka) 2008 Mukesh Kumar Goyal and Sons vs ED [LexDoc Id : 349228] ATFE (Delhi) 2008 Uma Joshi vs ED Repatriation of export proceeds-Reasonable steps for recovery-An appeal against imposition of penalty on the appellant for failure to take reasonable steps for repatriation of export proceeds within the prescribe [LexDoc Id : 340351] ATFE (Delhi) 2008 State Bank of India vs General Motor Finance Co. Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 338309] DRAT (Allahabad) 2008 Lalita Devi Budhia vs Allahabad Bank and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 336119] DRAT 2008 Tata Infomedia Ltd. vs ACIT Deduction: Income from publication of books-Publication of: Directory-The assessee published a directory of telephone numbers known as 'Yellow Pages'. The directory was a book. To be a book it was not necessary that it m [LexDoc Id : 334681] ITAT (Mumbai) 2008 CIT vs Arjun Prasad and Ajit Kumar Appeal to High court-Deletion of penalty by Tribunal, Penalty: Income estimated-AY 1984-85. The income of the assessee was estimated by estimating sales and applying net profit rate, by applying s.145(1). The explanation of the as [LexDoc Id : 332180] HC (Allahabad) 2008 CIT vs Rajendra Kumar Undisclosed Income-No evidence found in search-Block period 1 April 95 to 5 December 2004. The assessee was in the business of purchase and sale of wheat etc. The AO presumed on the basis of certai [LexDoc Id : 360290] HC (Madhya Pradesh) 2008 CIT vs Pithampur Steels (P) Ltd. Validity of: Re-assessment-Change of opinion-AY 1995-96. The amount of sales tax refund received was shown in the original return. This was allowed as a deduction by the AO on basis of facts on r [LexDoc Id : 348934] HC (Madhya Pradesh) 2008 CIT vs Ishwar Das Madho Prasad Penalty: Compulsory audit of account-Belated filing of audit report-AY 1990-91. The assessee had got his accounts audited and had obtained the audit report in time. However it was filed belated with the return filed un [LexDoc Id : 347456] HC (Allahabad) 2008 CIT vs Dalip Chand and Sons and Vice Versa Payment in cash-Absence of exceptional circumstances-The assessee made payments in cash in excess of specified limits for purchase of goods. There were no exceptional circumstances. The amount paid in ca [LexDoc Id : 342760] HC (Himachal Pradesh) 2008 Harish Kumar vs ED [LexDoc Id : 339408] ATFE (Delhi) 2008 CIT vs Silver Streak Trading (P) Ltd. Validity of assessment-Not service of notice-AY 1997-98. As per the AO a notice under s.143(2) was issued on 28 November 1998, fixing the hearing on 8 December 1998. The assessee filed an affidav [LexDoc Id : 331747] HC (Delhi) 2008 WTO vs Virendra Verma (HUF) [LexDoc Id : 342522] ITAT (Delhi) 2008 ITO vs V. Sunanda [LexDoc Id : 339356] ITAT (Hyderabad) 2008   First | Prev | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | Last