| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 3219 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Sunil Dutt Bakshi vs Dabur India Ltd. and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 372087]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2008 |
Oxford Academy for Career Development vs Chief CIT
Cancellation of Registration of Charitable institution/ trust-Powers of CIT: Law applicable-AY 2000-01 and 2001-02. The petitioner was a society registered under the societies Registration Act 1860. It was granted registration under s.12A, on [LexDoc Id : 361640]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2008 |
CIT vs Fascel Ltd.
Appeal to High Court: Substantial question of law-Interest payable on licence fee-Whether interest on licence fee could be allowed under s.35ABB was a substantial question of law.
S.260A and s.35ABB of the Income Tax Act 19 [LexDoc Id : 356023]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2008 |
DCIT vs Ford Credit Kotak Mahindra Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 355909]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2008 |
CIT vs A.R. Chadha
[LexDoc Id : 354942]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2008 |
State of Kerala vs Millenium Polypackers and Processors (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 354234]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2008 |
CIT vs India Crafts, Bharat Cine Co. (P) Ltd., Indus Valley Promoters Ltd., Model Footwear (P) Ltd., Basant Plasto Chemicals (P) Ltd., Britika Exports (P) Ltd., Francis Wacziarg, Abhishek Auto Industries Ltd. and Narain Jewels International Ltd.
Penalty: Concealment of income-Recording of satisfaction by AO-The tribunal had deleted the penalty, levied on the ground that requisite satisfaction of the A.O. for initiating penalty proceedings was not recorded [LexDoc Id : 354116]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2008 |
CIT vs Samir Bio-Tech (P) Ltd.
Cash credits-Share-application money-AY 1997-1998. The identities of the subscribers were not in doubt. Payments and receipts thru crossed cheques. The complete details of asstt. of subsc [LexDoc Id : 353969]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2008 |
CIT vs Siel Industrial Estate Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 353791]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2008 |
Municipal Committee and Anr. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 351921]
|
HC (Jammu and Kashmir) |
2008 |
Darshini Textiles vs CTO
[LexDoc Id : 406581]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2008 |
ACIT vs Sri Ramachandra Educational and Health Trust
[LexDoc Id : 384197]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2008 |
Purushottam Das vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 374626]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2008 |
Munni Devi vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 374467]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2008 |
Consulting Engg. Services India (P) Ltd. vs CIT
Deduction on actual payment-Payment of PF-AY 2001-02. The payment of PF made within the due date under s.139(1) but after the due date under PF Act could not be disallowed.
S.43B(b) o [LexDoc Id : 373659]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2008 |
R.K. Herbals vs State of Tamil Nadu
Appeal to appellate tribunal: Additional plea-Tribunals refusal to consider additional plea not justified-The provisions of s.36(3) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act 1959 empowered the tribunal ‘to pass orders as it thinks fit’. The words were the sa [LexDoc Id : 371449]
|
HC (Madras) |
2008 |
Tamil Nadu Cements Corpn. Ltd. vs K. Kandasami
[LexDoc Id : 364885]
|
HC (Madras) |
2008 |
Ammunition Factory Co-op. Credit Society Ltd. vs Badrinarayan R. Sharma, S.G. Kadam and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 357803]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
HP State Industrial Development Corpn. Ltd. vs CIT
Chargeable interest-Refinancing operations-The interest earned on refinancing operations was not part of chargeable interest.
S.4(2) Interest Tax Act 1974
[LexDoc Id : 355997]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2008 |
R.K. Singhal vs Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal
[LexDoc Id : 355973]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2008 |
Corporation Bank vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 355908]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2008 |
K.V. Sridharan and S. Ragupathy vs S. Sundamoorthy and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 351924]
|
HC (Madras) |
2008 |
DCIT vs State Bank of India
Powers of Special Court-Tax liabilities of notified persons-The Special Court established under "Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1997 had no jurisdiction to set in [LexDoc Id : 351839]
|
SC |
2008 |
B.V. Vodafone International Holdings vs UOI and ADIT
Income deemed to accrue in India-Acquiring controlling interest in Indian Company, Applicability of Indian Law-HEL was an Indian Joint Venture with foreign group company HTIL. HTIL was holding 67 per cent shares while HEL had 33 per cent. The petitioner vadafon [LexDoc Id : 351671]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Pravin vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 351573]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
