Register free! 
Banking - Judgement
[ 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 ]  

 
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 224   
Title Forum  Year
N. Sanjeeva and Anr. vs State Bank of Travancore Recovery of dues-Discharge of a guarantor-An order that required the appellant-guarantor to pay a certain amount to the respondent-bank was set aside. The debt for which the appellant was a gu [LexDoc Id : 292180]
DRAT 2005
N. S. Arumugam vs Trishul Traders Dishonour of Cheque-Burden of proof-The burden of proof to rebut the presumption that the cheque was for consideration, was on the drawer who had admitted to the execution of the cheque. [LexDoc Id : 298703]
HC (Chennai) 2005
Central Bank of India vs Sharad Rice Industries and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 295759]
DRAT (Allahabad) 2005
M. Sathya Narayana Reddy and Anr. vs Indian Bank [LexDoc Id : 295764]
DRAT (Chennai) 2005
DCW Ltd. and Anr. vs UOI and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 287297]
Gujarat HC 2005
Simertex vs Enforcement Directorate Repatriation of export proceeds-Liabilities of non-resident partners-The non-resident partners of the appellant firm were rightly held liable for contravention of s.68(1) of FERA 1973, as they were fully aware about the [LexDoc Id : 298552]
ATFE (Delhi) 2005
Iram Feroz vs Ayaz Gadhiya [LexDoc Id : 294555]
HC (Bombay) 2005
Shyama Devi Chourasia vs State Bank of India and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 293743]
DRAT 2005
Canara Bank vs Tribeni Motors and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 293742]
DRAT 2005
N. Radhakrishnan vs A.C. Thomas and Anr. Dishonour of Cheque-Liability of managing partner-A complaint under s. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 was maintainable against the managing partner of the firm, as he had signed the chequ [LexDoc Id : 292178]
HC (Kerala) 2005
Padmakar vs State Bank of India and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 309246]
HC (Delhi) 2005
Gangaram Biseshwar Agrawal vs Canara Bank Maintainability of appeal before the DRAT-Orders affecting substantive rights of the parties-Every order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) that affected the substantive rights of the was appealable before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribun [LexDoc Id : 295204]
HC (Bombay) 2005
Suman Madanlal Bora vs State of Maharashtra and Ors. Complaint under s. 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881-Inconclusive averments-The complaint under s.138 and s.141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 against a registered partnership firm and its partners was quashed as far a [LexDoc Id : 298399]
HC (Bombay) 2005
Usha Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. vs UOI [LexDoc Id : 295760]
DRAT (Allahabad) 2005
Kalyani Sales Co. and Anr. vs UOI and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 288364]
SC 2005
Rubey Pandey and Ors. vs United Bank of India Recovery of Debts-Re-call of ex parte order and condonation of delay-The ex parte order and the delay could not be condoned, as the plea was time-barred. The defendants were aware of the proceedings but chose to stay aw [LexDoc Id : 289351]
DRAT 2005
Ranbaxy Fine Chemicals Ltd vs National Enterprises [LexDoc Id : 297789]
HC (Delhi) 2005
State Bank of India vs Allied Chemical Laboratories and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 293746]
SC 2005
State of Gujarat vs Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 299542]
HC (Gujarat) 2005
Bharat Wagon and Engg. Co. Ltd and Anr. vs Hi-Tech Abrasives Ltd [LexDoc Id : 297792]
HC (Patna) 2005
Bank of Baroda vs Bedspread House [LexDoc Id : 295773]
DRT 2005
Lalit D. Sheth vs Directorate of Enforcement FERA-Repatriation of export proceeds-The penalty imposed under s. 18(2) and 18(3) of the FERA 1973 for not repatriating export proceeds was upheld. Even though the appellant had made effo [LexDoc Id : 298553]
ATFE (Delhi) 2005
Bank of Baroda vs Teg's Musrado Ltd. and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 287358]
DRAT 2005
RBI vs Al Falah Finlease Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 347129]
HC (Delhi) 2005
State Bank of India and Anr. vs Chinigeppali Lathangi and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 293725]
HC (Andhra Pradesh) 2005
 
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Next | Last