| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 275 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
D.K. Shipping Agency vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 502370]
|
CESTAT (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Calcutta Spring Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 502366]
|
CESTAT (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Imrose Traders and Furat Traders vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 502582]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2016 |
CC vs Vinay Enterprises
[LexDoc Id : 502594]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
Ambica Industries vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 502363]
|
CESTAT (Calcutta) |
2016 |
CC vs Sanghi Industries Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 502591]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2016 |
R. Piyarelall International (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 502590]
|
CESTAT (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Globelink WW India (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 502374]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2016 |
CC vs GAIL India Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 502372]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2016 |
Foam Mattings India Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 502371]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2016 |
Chemplast Sanmar Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 502369]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2016 |
Praveen Chaudhary vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 502589]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2016 |
CC vs Gokul Refoils and Solvents Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 502375]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2016 |
Hebe Ispat at Rashidchak Agamkuan vs State of Bihar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 502019]
|
HC (Patna) |
2016 |
Lumbini Beverages (P) Ltd. vs State of Bihar and Ors.
Waiver of interest-Section 96(3)(b) of VAT Act. Deferred tax return.-Petitioner challenged order passed by Commercial Taxes Officer, whereby request of petitioner for waiver of interest to certain extent stands declined [LexDoc Id : 501806]
|
HC (Patna) |
2016 |
Shaila Enterprises vs Commissioner of Value Added Tax
Adjustment Order-Issuance of-VATO issued adjustment order. Whether, in facts and circumstances of case VATO was justified in issuing adjustment order. Held, due to careless action [LexDoc Id : 501434]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Navakar Impex (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 502304]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
Verma Roadways vs Govt. of NCT Delhi and Ors.
Violation of statutory requirements-Section 60 and 60(1) of Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004. Sealing Order.-Sealing order was passed against petitioner by Spl. Commissioner. Whether, in facts and circumstances of case sealing order rightly passed against pet [LexDoc Id : 501436]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Subhas Bose and S.K. Santra vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 502311]
|
CESTAT (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Teleworld Mobiles (P) Ltd. vs CTT
Violation of Principal of Natural Justice-Notice for default Assessment of Tax-Petitioner engaged in sale and purchase of mobile phones. Notice for default assessment of tax was issued to Petitioner and penalty was imposed. Wheth [LexDoc Id : 501435]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Yu Televentures (P) Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 501433]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
CC vs Enterprise International Ltd., Aahana Commerce (P) Ltd. and Chemsilk Commerce (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 502299]
|
CESTAT (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Nagrik Adhikar Manch vs State of Bihar and Ors.
Recover loss of revenue-Bihar Public Demands Recovery Act, 1994.Initiation of Proceedings.-Petitioner sought investigation by Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and also direction to respondents, to recover loss of revenue by initiating p [LexDoc Id : 501432]
|
HC (Patna) |
2016 |
Bhailal Amin General Hospital vs State of Gujarat and Ors.
Object of charity-Section 2(10) of Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Dealer.-Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal held that appellant is 'dealer' within meaning of section 2(10) of Act. Whether, appellant rightly held to be dealer [LexDoc Id : 501438]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Prime Papers and Packers vs Commissioner of VAT and Ors.
Delay in processing refunds: Notices issued beyond time limits-No valid explanation for delay, Department directed to issue refund with interest-
Whether the respondent could be directed to refund to the petitioner the amounts claimed in the returns filed for various periods. Held, the not [LexDoc Id : 501210]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
