Intel Corpn. vs Anil Hada, Avinash Chander and Anr.
Passing off trademark-Interim injunction-No interim injunction could be issued against the defendant for using 'INTEL' in its corporate name, as there was no conclusive evidence established t [LexDoc Id : 305511]
Citicorp and Anr. vs Todi Investors and Anr.
IN Domain Name Dispute Resolution (INDR) Policy-Jurisdiction of civil courts-IN Domain Name Dispute Resolution (INDR) Policy could not oust jurisdiction of civil courts to deal with suit as the scope of a suit was far greater t [LexDoc Id : 304750]
HC (Delhi)
2006
Reckitt and Colman of India Ltd. vs Charmy Industries and Anr.
Registration of Trademark-Opposition to registration of mark-The registration of the mark 'CHARMY' was found to be deceptively similar to the registered mark 'CHERRY' and the colour scheme and get up used was id [LexDoc Id : 306832]
IPAB
2006
Agaroma vs Thai Airways International Ltd. and Anr.
Trademark-Removal of entry-An application under s.46, 56 and 107 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act 1956 for removal of entry from the trademark register was allowed. The re [LexDoc Id : 306830]
Austin Nichols and Co. Inc. vs Jagatjit Industries Ltd. and Ors.
Rectification of wrong entry-Jurisdiction of Assistant Registrar-The Assistant Registrar had the jurisdiction to rectify the entry made of the trademark, which was wrongly inserted when the opposition proceedings we [LexDoc Id : 306828]
Dev Pharmacy (P) Ltd. vs Ozone Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Passing off trademark-Permanent injunction-An application to issue a permanent injunction against the defendant was dismissed. The defendant in the interim filed for amendment of its original t [LexDoc Id : 306825]
Nalli Sambasivam and Anr. vs Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks
Registration of Trademark-Limitation, opposition notices-The notices of opposition against the registration of the mark 'Nalli' were proper and within the period of limitation. The notices were not served be [LexDoc Id : 316935]
Bharat N. Parikh vs Ashok Tripathy
Infringement of trademark-Prior user-An interim injunction granted against the plaintiff, restraining it from using the trademark ‘S.E.E.’ was set aside because even though the defendant’ [LexDoc Id : 305515]
Rajamani Fabrics and Anr. vs Mothi Textiles
Adoption of deceptively similar trademark-Interim injunction-Interim injunction was issued against the respondents restraining it from using the mark 'MOTI', which was deceptively similar to the plaintiff's mark [LexDoc Id : 306831]
HC (Chennai)
2006
Anji Reddy vs Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft
Registration of Trademark-Deceptive similarity-The registration of the trade mark 'Novigan' was upheld because it was different from the opponent's mark 'Navalgin'. Moreover, an appellate court co [LexDoc Id : 305514]
Saroop Prakash Nayar vs Chesebrough Pond's Inc. and Anr.
Cancellation of Trademark-Similarity in description of the product-An application to cancel the registered trademark 'Pond's' was dismissed. The applicant had opposed the registration of the impugned mark on ground of [LexDoc Id : 304170]
