| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Last |
| Documents Found: 146 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
J.B. Hosiery Industries vs Roop Hosiery Factory and Anr.
Opposition-Identical mark, prior user-The application for registration of a trademark was rightly rejected, as the mark adopted was identical to the respondent's trademark 'COMEX', which w [LexDoc Id : 295002]
|
IPAB |
2006 |
Hindustan Pencils Ltd. vs Bangalore Cottage Industries, Gaya
[LexDoc Id : 301255]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2006 |
H.M. Saraiya Ors. vs Ajanta India Ltd. and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 299071]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2006 |
Kirloskar Copeland Ltd. vs Daljeet Singh and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 293079]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2006 |
Godrej Sara Lee Ltd. vs Knight Queen Industries (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 318329]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2006 |
Allergan Inc. vs Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd.
Passing off goods-Permanent injunction-Permanent injunction was issued against the defendant restraining it from adopting a trademark that was deceptively similar to the plaintiff's well-kn [LexDoc Id : 294720]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2006 |
Aktiebolaget Volvo and Ors. vs MR. V.N. Prasad and Anr.
Infringement of trade mark-Deceptive similarity, passing off-Permanent injunction was issued against the defendant restraining it from using its adopted marks 'VOLVO' and 'VOLWO' because they were deceptively si [LexDoc Id : 292365]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2006 |
Grover Mechanical Works Regd. vs Bayerische Motoren Works and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 292362]
|
SC |
2006 |
Godrej Sara Lee Ltd. vs Reckitt Benckiser (I) Ltd.
Disparagement of product-Display of advertisements-The advertisement used by the defendant to promote its product “MORTEIN” could not be considered to disparage the plaintiff’s product “HIT”. In fact, [LexDoc Id : 292366]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2006 |
United Brothers vs Navin Kumar and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 296014]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2006 |
Pfizer Products, Inc. vs Rajesh Chopra and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 292367]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2006 |
Visakha Chemicals vs Mala Ram and Sons
Infringement and passing off goods-Prior user-Injunction was issued against the defendant restraining it from using identical marks' AM PACHAN' and 'ROCHAK' that were already adopted by plaintiff. [LexDoc Id : 292370]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2006 |
Gujarat Medicraft (P) Ltd. vs Cipla Ltd.
Opposition to registration of trademark-Non-compliance with Rule 50(1) -The opposition filed against the registration of a trademark was deemed to be abandoned as the opponent had neither filed any evidence in support of o [LexDoc Id : 294721]
|
RegTM (Ahmedabad) |
2006 |
Mawana Sugars Ltd. vs Mawana Establishment
Registration of internet domain name-Transfer of domain name-The domain name 'MAWANA.COM' could not be transferred to the complainant, as it failed to prove to possess exclusive rights in term MAWANA. The tradem [LexDoc Id : 292363]
|
WIPO |
2006 |
Paul Manufacturing Co. vs Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 291877]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2006 |
DCIT vs Sarabhai Piramal Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Interest on borrowed capital-Borrowed funds used for acquisition of capital assets-The interest paid by the assessee on funds borrowed for acquisition of capital assets for its business was deductible.
S.36(1)(iii) of the [LexDoc Id : 300846]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
P.M. Diesels (P) Ltd. vs Thukral Mechanical Works and Anr.
Infringement of trademark-Rectification application-A trademark could be taken off if it was nots used for a period of five years and one month. However, the period of unauthorized use of trademark woul [LexDoc Id : 291878]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2006 |
Ribbel International Ltd. vs Ribbel Medizintechnik Gmbh
Registration of domain name-Transfer of domain name-The domain name 'ribbel-med.com' could not be transferred to the complainant, as it was not identical to the complainant's mark 'Ribbel’ and the the [LexDoc Id : 292364]
|
WIPO |
2006 |
Bhavnesh Mohanlal Amin and Anr. vs Nirma Chemicals Works Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 287046]
|
SC |
2006 |
Yahoo! Inc. vs Sanjay V. Shah and Ors.
Passing off action-Permanent injunction, damages-A permanent injunction was granted in the plaintiff’s favour, restraining the defendant from using the trademark ‘Yahoo’ for trading products like gut [LexDoc Id : 291873]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2006 |
Hi-Tech Pipes Ltd. vs Asian Mills (P) Ltd.
Infringement of trade mark-Prior user, Passing off, Injunctions-A suit for perpetual injunction against piracy of trademark, copyright, passing off and rendition of accounts was allowed because the plaintiff was a [LexDoc Id : 291864]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2006 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Last |
| |
