| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 241 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
State of Karnataka vs Modayil Properties (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 447215]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
State of Karnataka vs Shyamaraju and Co. India (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 430071]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
Vodafone Essar South Ltd., Bharti Airtel Ltd. and Pepsico India Holdings (P) Ltd. vs State of Uttarakhand and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 416189]
|
HC (Uttarakhand) |
2011 |
Idea Mobile Communication Ltd. vs CCE and C
Service tax - Taxable services-Telecommunication services - sale of SPMs-A.Y.1997-1998, 1998-1999. The assessee sold sim cards to mobile subscribers. No asstt. of sale tax on such sales. The amount received on sale of SPM c [LexDoc Id : 414310]
|
SC |
2011 |
CC vs Office Tec Industries and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 417418]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
S.S. Photographic Lab (P) Ltd. and Sanat Kumar Dey vs State of Assam, Deputy Commissioner of Taxes and Superintendent of Taxes
[LexDoc Id : 414847]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2011 |
Shalimar Chemical Works Ltd. vs State of Assam, Commissioner of Taxes, Superintendent of Taxes and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 414591]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2011 |
Eureka Forbes Ltd. vs State of Bihar and Ors.
Tax leviability on vacuum cleaner: State Government empowered to issue a notification fixing higher rate than specified-Vacuum cleaner an electrical good and not excluded from the purview and ambit of Entry 81 of Notification dated 26 December 1977 -The Supreme Court, on the question whether vacuum cleaner could be included within the Entry 81 of the Notification dated 26 December 1977 issued unde [LexDoc Id : 414041]
|
SC |
2011 |
ETA Melco Engg. Co. (P) Ltd. vs CTO and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 427460]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
MGRM Medicare Ltd. vs CTO and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 421318]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2011 |
State of Karnataka vs Kitchen Appliances India Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 429998]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
Rajshree Jewellers vs Commissioner, Commercial Tax
[LexDoc Id : 425405]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2011 |
Hasmukh Parekh vs Assistant STO and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 430548]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2011 |
Deepa Panels vs State of Kerala
[LexDoc Id : 413914]
|
SC |
2011 |
Addl. CST vs Sehgal Autoriders (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 413642]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
Banglore Agarbatti House vs Commissioner Commercial Tax
[LexDoc Id : 443715]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2011 |
Ramaniyam Real Estates (P) Ltd. vs Commissioner of Service Tax
[LexDoc Id : 421393]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2011 |
State of Tamil Nadu vs Tvl. Deejay Plastics (P) Ltd.
Second sale exemption: Link between seller and alleged seller not proved-Burden on assessee to prove that sale from existing persons did take place, Order levying penalty upheld, Assessment order set aside-The tribunal rejected the State’s appeal holding that the assessee was entitled to second sale exemption. On appeal, the high court held that when the [LexDoc Id : 419588]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2011 |
First Reality vs ACCT
[LexDoc Id : 429109]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
Scholors Home Senior Secondary School vs State of Uttarakhand and Anr.
Tax liability on supply of foodstuff to residential students: Tax leviable on sale of taxable goods by dealer where business of sale of those goods was a primary and dominant activity-Incidental activity of supplying foodstuff not business, Petitioner not a dealer since no business carried out and no sale made, Notice proposing assessment on supply of foodstuff quashed-The petitioner had prayed for quashing of the notice for the relevant assessment years and for a direction restraining the respondents from making any [LexDoc Id : 416309]
|
HC (Uttarakhand) |
2011 |
Venus Marketing vs State of Kerala
[LexDoc Id : 429993]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2011 |
Star Metals vs Authority of Clarification and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 425488]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2011 |
Desai Brothers Ltd. vs Addl. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
[LexDoc Id : 422778]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
Gitanjali Associates, Punjab Industries and Uttaranchal Iron and Hardware vs State of Uttarakhand and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 416310]
|
HC (Uttarakhand) |
2011 |
B. Arjuna Raja vs State of Kerala
Gross profit addition for estimation of turnover: Addition to purchase value declared by the petitioner himself-Lower than the lowest percentage of gross profit declared by similar dealers adopted, Market value of timber considered, Order accepting estimation of gross profit at 12 percent upheld -The tribunal had accepted the estimation of gross profit at 12 percent based on evidence gathered by the department from similar traders who had decla [LexDoc Id : 419216]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2011 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
