First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 2648 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
CIT vs Pramod Kumar Maheshwari
Penalty: Concealment of income-Surrender of income by assessees father-AY 1990-91. During the search under s.132, at assessee's premises certain income was surrendered by his father. The said amount was added to his inco [LexDoc Id : 327730]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2006 |
CIT vs Deepchand Naresh Chand
Guest house expenses-Rent paid on guest house-AY 1986-87. The rent paid on guest house was disalllowable under s.37(4). S.30 was not applicable in respect of guest house expenses.
S.37(4) [LexDoc Id : 327150]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2006 |
CIT vs Vijay Kumar Bhasin, Shakti Property Dealers
Penalty: Concealment of income-Surrender of income subject to no penalty-AY 1985-86, 1986-87. The assessee had surrendered certain income under s.132(4) of the Income Tax Act 1961 to avail the benefit of ‘no penalty’ under [LexDoc Id : 321245]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2006 |
Suptd. of Post Offices and Ors. vs R. Valasina Babu
[LexDoc Id : 316272]
|
SC |
2006 |
CIT vs Meenakshi Narayanan Investments (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 309811]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2006 |
Sahara India (Firm) vs CIT and Anr.
Validity of special audit-Opportunity to assessee-The question whether, prior to ordering the assessee to get a special audit done under s.142(2A) of the Income Tax Act 1961 it was necessary to give t [LexDoc Id : 305879]
|
SC |
2006 |
S.A. Builders Ltd. vs CIT and Anr.
Deduction: Interest on borrowed capital-Interest free advance to sister concern-AY 1990-91, 1991-92. The assessee had borrowed funds on interest and advanced interest free advances to its sister concern, which was its subsidiary, [LexDoc Id : 305821]
|
SC |
2006 |
Kachwala Gems vs JCIT
Best judgment assessment-Non-maintenance of proper accounts-AY 1996-97, 1997-98. The best judgment assessment initiated on the grounds that the assessee did not maintain quantitative stock register or details, [LexDoc Id : 305782]
|
SC |
2006 |
CIT vs S. Hoshnak Singh (HUF)
Cost of acquisition-Agricultural land allotted in lieu of land in Pakistan-AY 1972-73. The assessee was alloted certain agricultural land in lieu of such land left by him in Pakistan. The said land became capital asset w.e.f [LexDoc Id : 324224]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2006 |
R and B Falcon (A) Pvt. Ltd. vs CIT
FBT on non-resident company-Travelling expenses of expatriate staff-
The applicant, a non-resident company, was engaged in the business of providing mobile offshore drilling rigs. The expenses incurred by it on transp [LexDoc Id : 315338]
|
AAR |
2006 |
Reach Cable Networks Ltd. vs DDIT
Procedure for assessment-Opportunity to assessee: Supply of copies of documents relied on-Inspite of repeated requests the AO did not supply the copies of documents relied on for initiating re-assessment proceedings. The said document was p [LexDoc Id : 334302]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2006 |
CIT vs Abdul Rahman Industries
Deduction: Income from exports-Business income: Unclaimed trade balances written back-AY 1993-94. There were outstanding credits in the books of accounts for purchase of goods. These balances representing credit balances were written ba [LexDoc Id : 327146]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2006 |
Fathudhinga Rice Mills vs CIT
Appeal to High court-Computation of unaccounted income-AY 1993-94. During the search under s.132, certain notebook was found which showed unaccounted sales. The CIT(A) worked out peak of the unaccounted sa [LexDoc Id : 325310]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2006 |
CIT vs Punjab Tractors Ltd.
Total turnover-Excise duty and Sales tax-AY 1998-99. The amount of excise duty and sales tax could not be included in the total turnover for computing deduction under s.80HHE.
S.80H [LexDoc Id : 325011]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2006 |
CWT vs Standard Fireworks (P) Ltd.
Wealth tax- Exemption-Land used for business-AY 2001-02. The assessee had held certain land which was used a a godown for storage of its products. The said land was in fact sold after 31 March 20 [LexDoc Id : 324221]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2006 |
K. Nirmala vs Central Bank of India
[LexDoc Id : 320765]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2006 |
Motor Industries Co. Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
Maintainability of writ petition-Notification of bonds for exemption from capital gains-AY 2007-08. The investment in notified bonds issued under s.54EC of the Income Tax Act 1961 would make the assessee exempt from capital gains. However [LexDoc Id : 316673]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2006 |
Ashok Leyland Finance Ltd. vs AA and Anr.
Validity of pre-emptive purchase of immovable property-Condition precedent, Understatement of consideration-The condition precedent before passing an order of pre-emptive purchase of immovable property was that the consideration should be understated. The sa [LexDoc Id : 316228]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2006 |
ACIT vs Binoshiba Liquor (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 309357]
|
ITAT |
2006 |
Ashok Leyland Finance Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
Validity: Pre-emptive purchase of immovable property-Sale instances relied on not comparable, No payment-deposit of consideration in time-The Appropriate Authority passed under s.269UD acquiring the property on alleged under statement of sale price on some comparable cases. The cases rel [LexDoc Id : 306152]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2006 |
CIT vs NEPC India Ltd.
Reasonableness of business expenditure-Burden of proof-AY 1993-94. Where s.40A(2) was involved, the burden was on the assessee to prove that the payment made was reasonable. [case remanded to AO]
LexDoc Id : 346574]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2006 |
Madhu Bala Modi vs ITO
Tax deducted at source-Refund-The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to act upon the application made under s.154 of the Income Tax Act 1961 for rectification of mistake. The [LexDoc Id : 333443]
|
ITAT (Jodhpur) |
2006 |
CIT vs Ayyanar Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd.
Rectification of mistakes by Tribunal-Limitation for rectification orders-AY 1989-90. The limitation for passing rectification order by the Tribunal is four years from the end of the financial year in which the original orde [LexDoc Id : 332186]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2006 |
CWT vs Ravi Malhotra
Challenge to AO’s jurisdiction-Objection after assessment-AY 1978-79. The challenge to AO’s jurisdiction could be made within one month from the service of notice or within one month from the date of completi [LexDoc Id : 323296]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2006 |
Raj and Raj Investments vs ITO and Ors.
Validity of retention of books of accounts-Authorisation in another’s name-The retention of petitioner’s books of accounts for a period of 18 months was arbitrary and invalid, as even though the survey was conducted at the pe [LexDoc Id : 321239]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2006 |
|
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
|