Register free!

Banking - Judgement [ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950 1949 1948 1947 1946 1945 1944 1943 1942 1941 1940 1939 1938 1937 1936 1935 1934 1933 1932 1931 1930 1929 1928 1927 1926 1925 1924 1923 1922 1921 1920 1919 1918 1917 1915 1914 1902 1900 1896 Select Court HC SC Others   First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last Documents Found: 2802    Title Forum  Year CIT vs Tamilnadu Industrial Development Corpn. Ltd. Business expenditure-Write-off of: Pre-project expenses-AY 1994-95 and AY 1999-2000. The assessee’s main object was to promote industrial development in the state through partnership with private enterprise [LexDoc Id : 335399] HC (Chennai) 2007 CIT vs Jagish Ram Krishan Chand Scope of: Revised return-Claiming deductions omitted in original return-AY 1979-80 and AY 1980-81. The assessee omitted to claim the benefit of deduction under s.80HH and under s.80J in the original return. The said benefi [LexDoc Id : 333402] HC (Himachal Pradesh) 2007 CIT vs Mahavir Alluminium Ltd. Valuation of closing stock-Consequent change in value of opening stock of the same year-AY 1999-2000. While valuing the closing stock as on 31 March 1999, the assessee made adjustment in value of closing stock by charging the modvat credi [LexDoc Id : 332669] HC (Delhi) 2007 CIT vs Mahavir Aluminium Ltd. Valuation of: closing stock-Modvat credit-Corresponding adjustment in the opening stock of the year-AY 1999-2000. While valuing the closing stock as on 31 March 1999 the assessee had charged Modvat credit on certain inputs. It was right in making cor [LexDoc Id : 331960] HC (Delhi) 2007 CIT vs Dharmendra Sharma Deduction on actual payment-Payments towards PF and ESI-AY 2001-02. The payments towards PF and ESI were made before the filing return but after a few days of the grace period. The Tribunal was right in del [LexDoc Id : 331335] HC (Delhi) 2007 CIT vs Mahavir Aluminimum Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 330855] HC (Delhi) 2007 CIT and Ors vs Md. Rizwan Block-assessment vs Regular Assessment-No merger to regular assessment with block-assessment-Block-period: 1 April 1996 to 29 October 2002. AY 1998-99. A regular assessment under s.143(3) was made for AY 1998-99. A search was conducted under s [LexDoc Id : 372993] HC (Patna) 2007 CIT vs Roopchand Nawal Chand Gandhi Unexplained investment-Year of assessment-AY 1987-88 and AY 1988-89. The assessee's previous year was Dipawali year, i.e. 3 November 1986 to Dipawali of 1987. The transaction in question relat [LexDoc Id : 340596] HC (Rajasthan) 2007 CIT vs Bilahari Enterprises (P) Ltd. Business loss: Year of accrual-Discount on chit amount-AY 2001-02. The assessee company was in the business of subscribing to chit funds. The discount loss on the chits was allowable fully in the year it o [LexDoc Id : 336985] HC (Chennai) 2007 CIT vs Acrow India Ltd. Valuation of Stock-Onus to prove valuation-AY 1991-92. The valuation of closing stock as declared by the assessee was rejected on the ground that valuation given to the bank were higher. The Tr [LexDoc Id : 336098] HC (Bombay) 2007 Mukand Global Finance Ltd. vs DCIT Computation of: book profits-Provision for non-performing assets-The assessee was a NBFC. The provisions made for non-performing assets was not a provision for liability. It was a provision for diminution of assets. [LexDoc Id : 334687] ITAT (Mumbai) 2007 CIT vs H.P. Agro Industries Actual cost-Capital subsidy received-The subsidy granted by the government was not deductible from the actual cost for computing the depreciation allowance. S.32 and s.43(1) of I [LexDoc Id : 332962] HC (Himachal Pradesh) 2007 P. Srinivas Naik vs ACIT Validity of proceeding under s.153C-No books etc. belonging to assessee was found-During the search at premises of another person, no books or documents or valuables belonging to the assessee were found. Therefore, no action agains [LexDoc Id : 332135] ITAT (Bangalore) 2007 I Gate Global Solutions Ltd. vs ACIT Computation of total turnover-Uplinking charges-The amount of uplinking charges reduced from the export turnover were to be reduced from total turnover. S.10A of the Income Tax Act 1961 [LexDoc Id : 331823] ITAT (Bangalore) 2007 ITO vs Data Software Research Co. (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 331219] ITAT (Chennai) 2007 CIT vs Bilahari Enterprises (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 330851] HC (Chennai) 2007 U.P. Forest Corpn. vs DCIT Exemption from tax: Charitable trust-Appeal against registration pending-AY 1977-78, AY 1980-81 and AY 1984-85. The CIT had rejected the assessee's application for registration under s.12A. The appeal against CIT's order wa [LexDoc Id : 330801] SC 2007 Chief CIT and Ors. vs Susheela Prasad and Ors. Maintainability of writ-Asking government to make an employee permanent-The respondents were appointed by the Income Tax department as Data Entry Operators on contract basis subject to maximum payment of Rs.50 per day. In [LexDoc Id : 329584] SC 2007 G.K. Choksi and Co. vs CIT Initial Depreciation-Business versus profession-AY 1984-85. The initial depreciation under s.32(1)(iv) as if then stood was allowable to an assessee carrying on business. It was not allowable in cas [LexDoc Id : 329554] SC 2007 Bharti Airtel Ltd. and Bharti Infratel Ltd., In re [LexDoc Id : 410550] HC (Delhi) 2007 Anand Mohan Singh vs State of Bihar and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 346062] HC (Patna) 2007 ACIT vs Shree Sajjan Mills Ltd. Business expenditure-Commission paid to brokers for sales-AY 1993-94. The assessee had produced the details of sales on which the commission or brokerage was paid. The copies of agreements with the brokers we [LexDoc Id : 342380] ITAT (Indore) 2007 Citi Bank N.A. vs Anil Bhat and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 338313] DRAT (Bombay) 2007 Pala Marketing Co-op. Society Ltd. vs UOI Condonation of delay-Belated return for refund of tax-AY 1997-98. In case of belated return for refund the CBDT must condone the delay if failure to condone delay caused genuine hardship to the assessee, [LexDoc Id : 335315] HC (Kerala) 2007 Asgar Jan vs CIT Computation of: capital gains-Commission or brokerage paid-AY 1991-92. For effecting sale of his property the assessee paid certain amount as commission or brokerage to 'B'. The payment was shown and assessed [LexDoc Id : 334835] HC (Karnataka) 2007   First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last