| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 6202 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Saral Plastics (P) Ltd. vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 506944]
|
ITAT (Ahmedabad) |
2016 |
Hanuman Sewa Samity vs CIT(E)
[LexDoc Id : 506934]
|
ITAT (Amritsar) |
2016 |
Suryalakshmi Cotton Mills Ltd. vs DCIT
DCIT vs Suryalakshmi Cotton Mills Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 506808]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2016 |
State Bank of India vs Addl. CIT
[LexDoc Id : 506807]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2016 |
SKG Refractories Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 506806]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2016 |
Purna Chandra Maiti vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 506805]
|
ITAT (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Bharat Parenterals Ltd. vs DCIT
Validity of Notice-Section148 of Income-tax Act, 1961. Re-opening of assessment.-Impugned Notice issued under Section148 Act had been issued to petitioner for re-opening of assessment. Whether, impugned notice issued to petitioner [LexDoc Id : 506603]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Mekan J. Gala vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 534813]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
Asian Capital Services Ltd. vs ACIT
ITO vs Asian Capital Services Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 533882]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
Siemens Public Communication Networks (P) Ltd. vs CIT and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 530221]
|
SC |
2016 |
Bhuri Singh vs State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.
Dismissal of claim for appointment: Direction of appointment duly complied with-Judgment of tribunal in appellant's favour, No occasion for further grievance-
Whether dismissal of appellant's claim for appointment as pipe fitter with retrospective effect was justified. Held, the order passed by the tri [LexDoc Id : 507462]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2016 |
Amit vs UOI and Anr.
Denial of appointment: Diploma not equivalent to graduation degree of a recognized university-Employer to decide the eligibility criteria, Courts not empowered to substitute their own view-
Whether denial of appointment to the petitioner on the ground that he only had three years diploma in Hotel Management instead of the required g [LexDoc Id : 507460]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Ramniklal S. Gosalia and Co. vs JCIT
[LexDoc Id : 507042]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
ACIT vs Rukhana Enterprises
[LexDoc Id : 506984]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
DCIT vs Renu Agarwal
[LexDoc Id : 506983]
|
ITAT (Jaipur) |
2016 |
ACIT vs R. Tech Systems India (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 506980]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
Quantum Advisors (P) Ltd. vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 506979]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
DCIT vs Renu Agarwal
[LexDoc Id : 506942]
|
ITAT (Jaipur) |
2016 |
Kota Sahakari Bhoomi Vikas Bank Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 506935]
|
ITAT (Jaipur) |
2016 |
Amar Singh Sharma vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 506926]
|
ITAT (Jaipur) |
2016 |
Vanguard Jewels Ltd. vs DCIT
Disallowance of expenses-Dividend income-Whether, disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii) and (iii) of Rule rightly calculated by AO. Held, it is seen that AO noticed that assessee had earned divid [LexDoc Id : 506735]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
ITO vs Shiv Sarjan Developers
Deletion of disallowance-Comparable data-Whether, CIT(A) was justified in deleting disallowance made by AO. Held, disallowance of 50% made by AO not based on comparable data or justification [LexDoc Id : 506732]
|
ITAT (Ahmedabad) |
2016 |
Raj Metal Co. vs ITO
Validity of reassessment-Section 143(3) and Section 151 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Jurisdiction.-Whether, in facts and circumstances of case AO was justified in issued notice for reassessment proceedings. Held, original assessment was completed un [LexDoc Id : 506731]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
DCIT vs Pravav Securities (P) Ltd.
Deletion of addition-Section 55(2)(ab) of Finance Act, 2001. Indexation benefit.-Whether, CIT(A) rightly directed AO to allow indexation benefit from AY 1998-99 and not from AY 2005-06 in spite of fact that shares of BSE were acqui [LexDoc Id : 506730]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
Mahasagar Travels Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 506729]
|
ITAT (Rajkot) |
2016 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
