| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 6202 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Principal CIT vs U.K. Paints India (P) Ltd.
Cancellation of disallowance-Section 14A of Income Tax Act, 1961 and Section 8D of Income Tax Rules, 1961. Methodology.-ITAT cancelled disallowance made under Section 14A of Act read with Rule 8D of Income Tax Rules. Whether, ITAT was justified in cancelling disallowanc [LexDoc Id : 507308]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Bhartiben Bakuleshbhai Mehta vs ITO
Validity of Notice-Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Reopening of assessment.-Petitioner sought to quash and set aside impugned notice by which AO in exercise of powers under Section 147 of Act has sought to reopen assessment. W [LexDoc Id : 507235]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Takhelmayum Khelendro Meitei and Ors. vs State of Manipur and Ors.
Prayer for appointment: Candidate not having legal right to be appointed-Requirement of persons for various projects, Respondent directed to undertake appointment process-
Whether the respondents could be directed to appoint the petitioners. Held, a candidate did not have a legal right to be appointed. Neither was [LexDoc Id : 506638]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2016 |
Bhartiben Bakuleshbhai Mehta vs ITO
Validity of assessment order-Section147of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Re-opening of assessment.-AO issued impugned notice to petitioner for reopening of assessment in exercise of powers under Section147of Act. Whether, in facts and circumstances [LexDoc Id : 506604]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Dineshbhai Bhagvanbhai Patel vs State of Gujarat and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506533]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Takshashila Realties (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
Validity of Notice-Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Re-opening of assessment.-Notice for reopening of assessment had been issued to Petitioners. Whether, notice under Section 148 of Act had been rightly issued to petitioners. He [LexDoc Id : 506905]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
UOI and Ors. vs All India Trade Union Congress and Ors.
Direction to not permit workmen to complete 240 days: Inhumane service conditions-Services of workmen not temporary, Mandatory directions issued for regularization of services-
Whether the direction to the authorities to ensure that no labourer be permitted to work for more than 239 days and thereafter they should be di [LexDoc Id : 506641]
|
HC (Uttarakhand) |
2016 |
Sangeeta Choudhary vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.
Candidature for appointment: Non-compliance with directions of high court-Experience entitling petitioner to bonus marks, Direction to count experience from date of directions-
Whether the candidature for appointment of petitioner on the post of Nurse Gr. II with all consequential benefits could be considered. Held, the [LexDoc Id : 506608]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Ramesh Singh and Ors. vs State of Bihar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506607]
|
HC (Patna) |
2016 |
M. Murali Krishnan vs Tamil Nadu State Transport Corpn. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506539]
|
HC (Madras) |
2016 |
Lakshmidevamma vs Divisional Controller K.S.R.T.C.
[LexDoc Id : 506537]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2016 |
Kaberi Maitra vs State of West Bengal and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506536]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Maharao Bhim Singh of Kota vs CIT
Benefit of exemption-Section 10 (19A) of the Income Tax Act 1961. Principal of res-judicata.-Whether, appellant is entitled to get full benefit of exemption granted to him under Section 10 (19A) of Act from payment of income-tax or it is confi [LexDoc Id : 506403]
|
SC |
2016 |
Rakesh Katara vs High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur
[LexDoc Id : 506325]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Veer Pratap Naik vs AVEVA Information Technology India (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 506305]
|
MISC |
2016 |
Rakesh Sanghi vs Bennett, Coleman and Co. Ltd. and Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 506304]
|
MISC |
2016 |
N.K. Prakash Babu vs South Indian Film Chamber of Commerce and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506303]
|
MISC |
2016 |
Abdul Waseem, Abdul Basit and Abdul Azim vs DLF Universal Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 506302]
|
MISC |
2016 |
Pranab Kumar Dalal vs Balasore Electrical Division and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506545]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2016 |
Goura Prasad Pattanaik and Ors. vs State of Odisha and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506534]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2016 |
Karnataka Power Transmission Corpn. Ltd. vs M. Rajashekar, H.M. Ravishankar, H.M. Mahesh, Assistant Commissioner and Land Acquisition Officer
[LexDoc Id : 532299]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2016 |
Swayamstuti Pattanayak and Ors. vs Principal Chief CIT and Ors.
Transfer of cases-Prejudiced-Commissioner of Income Tax, Sambalpur has assigned jurisdiction over cases assessed to tax by ACIT, Circle-2(1), Sambalpur. Whether, decision taken to [LexDoc Id : 507307]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2016 |
Madras Engg. Industries (P) Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner
[LexDoc Id : 507005]
|
HC (Madras) |
2016 |
ITO vs Sridhar Prasad Sharma
Sridhar Prasad Sharma vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 506991]
|
ITAT (Jaipur) |
2016 |
CIT and Ors. vs Wipro GE Medical System Ltd.
Computation of deductions-Section 10A & Section 80HHE of Income Tax Act, 1961. Profit from business.-Whether, appellate authorities were correct in holding that when computing deduction under Section 10A of Act expenditure should be confined to manufa [LexDoc Id : 506906]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2016 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
