First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 6202 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
ACIT vs H.B. Estate Developers (P) Ltd.
H.B. Estate Developers (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 506728]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
ITO vs Bawa Developers (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 506726]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
ACIT vs Axtel Industries Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 506707]
|
ITAT (Ahmedabad) |
2016 |
Amit Keshan vs CIT
[LexDoc Id : 506706]
|
ITAT (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Glaxosmithline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs ACIT
Disallowance-Section 14A of Income Tax Act, 1961. Proportionate interest.-Whether, disallowance of proportionate interest under Section 14A of Act rightly made. Held, regarding disallowance of proportionate interest under Se [LexDoc Id : 506705]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
DCIT vs Prabhakar T. Bhandary
Prabhakar T. Bhandary vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 535804]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
ACIT vs Pinaki D. Panani
Pinaki D. Panani vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 535802]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
CIT vs C. Subba Reddy
Deemed Dividend-Section 2(22)(e) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Business transactions.-Whether on facts and circumstances of case, Tribunal was right in holding that provisions of Section 2(22)(e) treating a loan or advance as deemed div [LexDoc Id : 507240]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Bharti Airtel Ltd. and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
Validity of Show Cause Notice-Period of Limitation-Second respondent issued several impugned Show Cause Notices, in order to deem petitioner as an "assessee in default". Whether, impugned Show Cause No [LexDoc Id : 507239]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Hindustan Gum and Chemicals Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 506843]
|
ITAT (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Cutting Edge Technologies vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 525056]
|
ITAT (Chandigarh) |
2016 |
Unicolour Chemicals Co. vs Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Taxes Department
[LexDoc Id : 507114]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Transmission Corpn. of AP Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 506847]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2016 |
ITO vs Priyanka Transport
[LexDoc Id : 506846]
|
ITAT (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Association of Physicians of Hyderabad Trust vs CIT
[LexDoc Id : 506842]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2016 |
CIT and Anr. vs Yokogawa India Ltd.
Mechanism of total income-Purview of computation-Whether, Section 10A of Act is beyond purview of computation mechanism of total income as defined under Act. Held, if specific provisions of Act provi [LexDoc Id : 506617]
|
SC |
2016 |
CIT vs Subhash Vinayak Supnekar
[LexDoc Id : 535868]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Inter Craft Ltd. and Ors. vs CIT and Ors.
Demand-Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998. Provisions of scheme.-Petitioner challenged demand made by respondent demanding certain sum through notice under provisions of Scheme, 1998. Whether, respondent was justif [LexDoc Id : 507244]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Nandesari Industries Association vs DCIT
Validity of Notice-Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Reopening notice.-AO issued impugned Notice under Section 148 of Act to reopen assessment in exercise of power under Section 147of Act. Whether, impugned notice under S [LexDoc Id : 507302]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Shree Hari Inn (P) Ltd. vs Mercedes Benz India (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 506618]
|
MISC |
2016 |
Andrew Telecommunications India (P) Ltd. vs CIT and Ors.
Stay on demand-Grant of-AO granting stay to petitioner. Whether, AO was justified in granted stay to petitioner, which includes a right to adjust the refund, if any, to the e [LexDoc Id : 506602]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
K.L.B. Securities (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
Validity of Notice-Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Reopening of assessment.-Notice under Section 148 of Act was issued for reopening of assessment. Whether, notice issued under Section 148 of Act was justified or not. Held, AO [LexDoc Id : 507245]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority vs DDIT
Validity of Notice-Section 12A and Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Reopening of assessment.-Petitioner sought to quash and set aside impugned notice by which AO in exercise of powers under Section 147 of Act has sought to reopen assessment. W [LexDoc Id : 507237]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
T. Shoba Rani vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 506734]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2016 |
Cellcon vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 506727]
|
ITAT (Calcutta) |
2016 |
|
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
|