| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 315 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
T.P. Prakashan vs State of Kerala and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 507118]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2016 |
Accudata Tech Solutions (P) Ltd. vs Office of the Deputy Commissioner (Intelligence), Commercial Taxes
[LexDoc Id : 507000]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2016 |
CTO vs Kiran Enterprises and Ors.
Deletion of penalty-Inquiry-Tax Board deleted penalty and reversing orders passed by both, AO and DC(A). Whether, Tax Board was justified in deleting penalty imposed by AO. Held, [LexDoc Id : 506309]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Shital Beverages vs State of Gujarat
Purified water-Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969. Entry.-Whether on facts and in circumstances of case, Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal is justified in law in holding that purified water when sold in loose [LexDoc Id : 506312]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Meera Metal Industries vs CST
Heat-resistant cookware-Schedule Entries C-II-17 and C-II-46A appended to the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Schedule entry.-Whether, on facts and circumstances of case and on true and correct interpretation of Schedule Entries C-II-17 and C-II-46A appended to Act, 1959 was [LexDoc Id : 507006]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
D.P. Corgo Movers (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 505822]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2016 |
TVl. Deekay Sales Corpn. vs Tamilnadu Sales Tax and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 505948]
|
HC (Madras) |
2016 |
Coastal Engg. Konthuruthy vs Southern Railway and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506341]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2016 |
Oil and Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. vs Trichy Construction Co. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 505838]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
DBM Geotechnics and Constructions (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 505823]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
D. Pukeho Mao and Ors. vs State of Manipur and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 505821]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2016 |
Mohammed Shafi vs Govt. of Karnataka and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 505831]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2016 |
T.T.P. Technologies (P) Ltd. vs State of Karnataka and Ors.
Validity of rules-Article 226 of Constitution of India,1950. Maintainability of petition.-Whether, question of vires as raised is really involved or not, can be looked into at first blush. Held, even question validity of Rules cannot be all [LexDoc Id : 505946]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2016 |
State of Gujarat vs Rajhans Vegetable Oil Refinery (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 505935]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Scania Commercial Vehicles India (P) Ltd. vs Govt. of Karnataka and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 505833]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2016 |
Delvin Formulations (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs Peekay Mediequip Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 505824]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Texmaco Rail and Engg. Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 505837]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
P.C.W. Castings (P) Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506134]
|
HC (Madras) |
2016 |
Janta Store vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 505828]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Gour Chandra Gorai and Ors. vs State of West Bengal and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 505826]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Commercial Tax Officer and Ors. vs State Bank of India and Anr.
Purchasing of Replenishment licences or Exim scrips-Transfer of ownership in goods-Replenishment licences or Exim scrips was purchased by SBI. Whether, by purchased Replenishment licences or Exim scrips ownership in goods was transfe [LexDoc Id : 505153]
|
SC |
2016 |
Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. vs Dty. Commissioner
Stock transfer-Disallowance-Respondent disallowed stock transfer effected by petitioner in their depot Tada, which is in State of Andhra Pradesh. Whether, respondent was justifie [LexDoc Id : 505936]
|
HC (Madras) |
2016 |
State of Tripura and Ors. vs Swapan Das
[LexDoc Id : 505834]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2016 |
Millenium Synergy (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs State of Arunachal Pradesh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 505830]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2016 |
CTO vs Rajasthan Agro and General Industries
[LexDoc Id : 505945]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
