| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 315 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Neel Auto (P) Ltd. vs ACCT
Additional tax-Section 55 of Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1956. Surcharge over.-Petitioner challenged order by which application filed under section 55 of TNGST Act, for rectifying error which has crept in order of assessment unde [LexDoc Id : 505944]
|
HC (Madras) |
2016 |
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and Ors. vs Bajaj Auto Ltd. and Anr.
Levy of surcharge-Section 5A of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947. Rule 18 of the Odisha Entry Tax Rule, 1999. Computation of entry tax-Whether, the 'Surcharge' under Section 5A of the OST Act is to be computed on the gross amount of sales tax or on the net amount of sales tax after se [LexDoc Id : 504761]
|
SC |
2016 |
Kail Ltd. vs State of Kerala
Levy of tax on sale of goods-Section 5(2) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. Sale by subsidiary company under the brand name of holding company-The appellant-Company challenged the assessment made against it under section 5(2) of the Act after disallowance of second sale exemption demark on th [LexDoc Id : 504760]
|
SC |
2016 |
Montecarlo Ltd. vs NTPC Ltd.
Non-responsive technical bid-Principal of restraint-Bid of appellant was technically held to be non-responsive. Whether, in facts and circumstances bid of appellant rightly held to be non-responsive. He [LexDoc Id : 504575]
|
SC |
2016 |
Addl. CCT vs Ayili Stone Industries Etc.
State exchequer-Re-adjudication of matter-High Court overturned order passed by Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, whereby revisional authority has opined that there had been an erro [LexDoc Id : 504574]
|
SC |
2016 |
BMM Ispat Ltd. vs State of Karnataka and Ors.
Disqualification at pre bidding stage-Qualification criteria for bid-The petitioner assailed the communication wherein the second respondent- has informed the petitioner that the application submitted by it was not pre- [LexDoc Id : 504980]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2016 |
Addl. Commissioner, (VAT and IT) and Ors. vs Sukirty Vyapar and Ors.
Rate of tax-Mobile cranes wire ropes-Whether, in facts and circumstances of case Rajasthan Tax Board was justified in law in holding goods namely "Mobile Cranes wire ropes" liable to tax [LexDoc Id : 505128]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Sri Ram Food Industries vs State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.
Power of judicial review-Non-awarding of tender-Petitioner firm aggrieved by non-awarding of tender despite it being lowest tenderer. Whether, in facts and circumstances of case power of Judicial Re [LexDoc Id : 505063]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2016 |
Seth Industrial Corpn. vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.
Cancellation of Tender Documents-Condition of turnover-Petitioner-partnership sought issuance of writ, order or direction in nature of prohibition restraining respondent from in any manner whatsoever proce [LexDoc Id : 505061]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Nirlac Chemicals and Ors. vs Haffkine Bio-Pharmaceutical Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
Rejection of bid-Tender-Respondent No. 1 rejected "techno-commercial" bid of petitioners in relation to tender floated for supply of "Bivalent Oral Polio Vaccine Bulk" ["bOPV [LexDoc Id : 505030]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Jyoti Thakur vs Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 504984]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2016 |
Shirin Foods Limited and Ors. vs Kolkata Municipal Corpn. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 505062]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Dugar Tea Industries (P) Ltd. vs State of Assam and Ors.
Denial of sales tax exemption-Section 4 of the Assam Industries (Sales Tax Concession) Act, 1987. Rule 2(f) of the Assam Industries (Sales Tax Concession) Rules, 1986. Certificate of authorization-The denial of sales tax exemption was challenged by the assessee. Whether, the sales tax exemption was rightly denied to the assessee. Held, Rule 2(f) [LexDoc Id : 504051]
|
SC |
2016 |
Consortium of Titagarh Firema Adler S.P.A.-Titagarh Wagons Ltd. vs Nagpur Metro Rail Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
Opening Price-Malafides-Present petition filed to sought direction to respondent no. 1 to declare respondent No. 2 as disqualified and declare that opening of price of respon [LexDoc Id : 505028]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Sesa International Ltd. and Ors. vs Director General of Foreign Trade and Ors.
Re-submission of license-Status quo of order-Petitioner was directed to re-submitted concerned license by impugned order. Whether, impugn order is arbitrary, illegal, issued in violation of princ [LexDoc Id : 504515]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Monnet Ispat and Energy Ltd. and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
Validity of tender process-Bidder participant-Petitioner challenged tender process regarding coal block auctions. Whether, in facts and circumstances of case petitioner was justified in challengin [LexDoc Id : 504372]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Ghodawat Energy (P) Ltd. vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Demanding part payment-Clarificatory notification-Petitioners sought quashing of respondent no. 4’s order demanding part payment and restraining respondents by their servants, agents and subordinates [LexDoc Id : 504510]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Chhatisgarh Power and Coal Beneficiation Ltd. and Ors. vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.
Tender Notice-Article 14, Article 19(1)(g) and Article 21 of Constitution of India, 1950. Violative of Constitution.-Rajasthan Vidhyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd. (RVUN), floated tender for supply of 2.0 Lac MT per month of Raw Coal and supply of washed coal to Chhabra Therma [LexDoc Id : 504369]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Kumaran Trading Co. vs DCTO
[LexDoc Id : 504600]
|
HC (Madras) |
2016 |
Sistema Shyam Teleservices Ltd. and Ors. vs Reliance Communication Ltd.
Sanction to scheme of arrangement-Section 180 of Companies Act, 2013. Transfer of telecom business.-Petitioner sought sanction of scheme of arrangement for transfer of telecom business undertaking of Transferor Company to Transferee company on an ong [LexDoc Id : 504479]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Vitthal Agro Exports and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 504343]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Montecarlo Ltd. vs NTPC Ltd.
Rejection of tender-Qualifying requirements for tender-The petitioner challenged the rejection of its tender. Whether, the proposal/bid of the petitioner was responsive to the qualifying requirements set o [LexDoc Id : 504336]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Harmanprit Singh Sidhu vs Arcadia Shares and Stock Brokers (P) Ltd.
Application for condonation of delay-Section 34 and Section 37(1) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.Re-filling.-Application for delay which was filed under Section 5 of Act had been allowed by single judge by virtue of impugned order. Whether, impugned order by [LexDoc Id : 504292]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Eurocoustic Products Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
Non-selection-Adoption of unfair treatment-Petitioner was not selected by respondent in pre-qualification level. Whether, respondents was adopted any irrational approach in not selecting petiti [LexDoc Id : 504288]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Balasaheb and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 504284]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
