| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 315 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
State of Gujarat vs Dresser Rand India (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 503719]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Agrotech Foods Ltd. vs ACTO
[LexDoc Id : 503717]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Viom Networks Ltd. vs Videocon Telecommunications Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 503602]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
ATC Telecom Tower Corpn (P) Ltd. vs Videocon Telecommunications Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 503611]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
CCT vs A.R. Thermosets (P) Ltd.
Taxability of Bitumen Emulsion-VAT Act, 2008. Bitumen vis-à-vis Bitumen Emulsion-The taxability of Bitumen emulsion was disputed herein. As per Respondent assessee it would be tax at 4% under Serial no. 22 Part A of Schedule II to [LexDoc Id : 502571]
|
SC |
2016 |
Larsen and Toubro Ltd. vs Addl. DCCT and Anr.
Inclusion of value of sub contactor work in total turnover-Article 366(29A) (b) of the Constitution of India. Section 6-B of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957. Rule 6 (c) (1) of Karnataka Sales Tax Rules, 1957 Determination of total and taxable turnover-The inclusion of value of the work entrusted to the sub-contractor while computing total turnover of the assessee for the purpose of taxation under th [LexDoc Id : 502572]
|
SC |
2016 |
D.C. Food Products vs CTT
Retrospective effect of circular-Power to Declare Law-Whether, 2004 circular have effect of effacing 1979 circular with retrospective effect. Held, power to declare law is vested in and with court. Power [LexDoc Id : 502954]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2016 |
Shivram Enterprises vs State of Goa and Ors.
Validity of tender process-Right to cancel tender process-Petitioner sought for a declaration that the tender process under the second tender notice was bad, void ab initio and unconstitutional and also sough [LexDoc Id : 502774]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Aqua Designs India (P) Ltd. vs Principal Commissioner of Service Tax
Maintainability of Petition-Section 6(2) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Bypass Statutory Appellate Authority-Various equipments procured by petitioner would be sold to their customers on transit sale basis and in such circumstances, petitioner would be exempt [LexDoc Id : 502949]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Indoriya Security Force vs State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors.
Rejection of bid-Scope of Judicial review-Financial bid of Petitioners was rejected and bid of Respondent no 4 was accepted. Whether, decision was arbitrary and requires interference. Held, no [LexDoc Id : 502736]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2016 |
Gurmeet Singh and Ors. vs N.D.M.C. and Ors.
Tehbazari Rights-Eviction-Petitioners had been forcibly evicted from shops. Whether, eviction of Petitioners from shops was against their Resolutions and being bad in law, same [LexDoc Id : 502735]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
United Spirits Ltd. and Ors. vs State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 502962]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2016 |
Gwalior Alcobrew (P) Ltd. vs State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors.
Exemption-Entry 47 to Schedule I of VAT Act. Sold outside State.-Petitioner is manufacturer of Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL) and spirit. IMFL manufactured by petitioner in State of Madhya Pradesh is sold both wi [LexDoc Id : 502956]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2016 |
Philip Mathew vs Kerala Transport Development Finance Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
Entitlement to allotment of shops-Rejection of offer-This petition is filed by the petitioner seeking to declare that petitioner was the highest bidder in respect of shop rooms bearing Code Nos. S-2 and [LexDoc Id : 502771]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2016 |
Savio Bio Organic and Fertilizers (P) Ltd. vs State of Karnataka and Ors.
Alternative remedy of appeal-Article 226 of Constitution of India, 1950. Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Maintainability of Petition.-Assistant Commissioner (Enforcement) during his visit to office of petitioner found that petitioner had suppressed turn over and not paid tax of Rs. 7 [LexDoc Id : 502959]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2016 |
K.K. Vidyut vs UOI and Ors.
Rejection of technical bid-Non-submission of documents-The petitioner challenged the rejection the technical bid. Whether, the respondents have grossly erred in rejecting the bid of the petitioner, on the [LexDoc Id : 502769]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Madan Lal vs Lt. Governor and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 501983]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
CST vs Bajaj Tempo Ltd.
Purchase price-Section 2(22) and Section 2(28) of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Customs Duty.-Whether, customs duty paid by respondent on goods imported by it from out of country, and which used in manufacture of their vehicles, should be inclu [LexDoc Id : 502951]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
CST vs Bajaj Tempo Ltd.
Purchase price-Section 2(22) of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Inclusion in definition.-Respondent is manufacturer of motor vehicles and duly registered under provisions of BST Act as also Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Respondent has its f [LexDoc Id : 502013]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Arati Infratech (P) Ltd. vs State of Odisha and Ors.
Forfeiture of earnest money deposit-Acceptance of offer-Earnest money deposited by petitioner was forfeited before acceptance of tender. Whether, forfeiture of earnest money deposited by petitioner before a [LexDoc Id : 502726]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2016 |
Orion Security Solutions (P) Ltd. vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
Rejection of Financial Bid-Substantial Manpower-Financial bid of petitioner was rejected by respondent no. 2 on ground that same was non responsive to terms of tender document. Whether, impugned ord [LexDoc Id : 501987]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Girjamata Labour Co-op Society Ltd. vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
E-tender process in allotment of contracts to Labour Cooperative Societies-Avoid Malpractice-Petitioner assails Government Resolution stipulating e-tender process in allotment of contracts to Labour Cooperative Societies above Rs. 3,00,000/-. [LexDoc Id : 501979]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Bhagyashree Joshi vs Managing Director BPCL and Ors.
Rejection of candidature for allotment of LPG Distributorship-Forfeiture of amount-Territory Manager (LPG) Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL) issued order whereby petitioner had been informed that her candidature for allotme [LexDoc Id : 501903]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Industrial Promotion and Investment Corpn. of Orissa Ltd. vs New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and Anr.
Policy for burglary/house breaking-Forcible entry-Seized assets of M/s. Josna Casting Centre Orissa Pvt. Ltd were put to auction by Appellant. It was detected that some parts of plant and machinery we [LexDoc Id : 501499]
|
SC |
2016 |
Finolex Cables Ltd. and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 502017]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
