| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 315 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Vaigai Club vs Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 502031]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Ranjit Recreation Club vs Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 502025]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Ornate Labs (P) Ltd. vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
Disqualified for Bid-Financial Bid-Petitioner's bid was found to be ineligible and, therefore, his financial bid has not been considered. Allegation against petitioner was that he had f [LexDoc Id : 501988]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2016 |
Super Cassettes Industries (P) Ltd. vs Goldy Dish Antenna and Ors.
Copyright-Section 7 of Commercial Courts Act. Section 4 of the Delhi High Court (Amendment) Act. Jurisdiction.-Plaintiff filed suits to restrain defendant in each of the suits from broadcasting or otherwise communicating to public cinematograph films, sound re [LexDoc Id : 501980]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Arindam Singh Roy vs State of West Bengal and Ors.
Permanent bar license-Article 14 of Constitution of India, 1950. Guarantee of equality.-Whether, prayer sought by petitioner for writ of mandamus directing respondents to grant permanent Bar License, for his restaurant should be allowed. [LexDoc Id : 501801]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
CST vs Bhima Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.
Sale of Bagasse-Section 5 of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Tax Free.-Respondent dealer is co-operative society manufacturing sugar and duly registered under Act. Whether on facts and circumstances of case, Tribunal was [LexDoc Id : 502014]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
B. Narasamma vs Dty. Commissioner Commercial Taxes and Anr.
Taxability of declared goods-Article 286(3) of the Constitution. Section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Section 5-B of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.Rate of tax-The issue has arisen over the rate of taxability of declared goods - i.e. goods declared to be of special importance under Section 14 of the Act, 1956 [LexDoc Id : 501147]
|
SC |
2016 |
Komal Construction and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Rejection of tender-Disqualified-Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 in rejecting tender of petitioners at the stage of opening of Envelope No. 1. Whether, respondent nos. 1 to 4 rightly disqualif [LexDoc Id : 501510]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Vipul Manharlal Shah and Ors. vs State of Gujarat and Ors.
Constitutional validity of provisions-Sections 6(2), 8, 27(1), 28(1) and 28(2) (c) of the Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1963. Rule 48, 56 and 57 of the Gujarat Agricultural Produce Market Rules, 1965. Collection of market fee-The Petition filed to challenge the provisions under Sections 6(2), 8, 27(1), 28(1) and 28(2) (c) of the Act, 1963 and Rules 48, 56 and 57 of the Rule [LexDoc Id : 501524]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Kohinoor Agencies vs CTO and Ors.
Order of Assessment-Remanded-Petitioner filed appeal against order of assessment, for assessment year 2006-07. Appeal memorandum was returned on ground that he has become functus [LexDoc Id : 501440]
|
HC (Madras) |
2016 |
Tvl. Kovilpatti Sarvodaya Sangh vs JCCT and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 501442]
|
HC (Madras) |
2016 |
Nahar Singh Chaudhary vs State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.
Collection of market fee as arrears of land revenue-Rule 82 of the H.P. Agricultural Produce Market Rules, 1971. Validity of demand notice-Petitioner challenged the issuance of Demand Notice issued by Respondent No. 2 i.e. Marketing Committee (Shimla and Kinnaur) for recovery of market fe [LexDoc Id : 501515]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2016 |
C. Elangovan vs Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
Rejection of bid-Tender-Second respondent, vide E-mail communication dated 27.05.2016, informed petitioner that tender submitted by his late wife has been rejected due to tec [LexDoc Id : 501505]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Tvl Vantage Leathers India (P) Ltd. vs State of Tamil Nadu and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 501441]
|
HC (Madras) |
2016 |
Tamilnadu Petroproducts Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner, Fast Track Assessment Circle II and Ors.
Inter-state sale-Section 3 of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Contractual Obligation.-First respondent denied to accept form-XVII, issued by HLL, on sale of delivery of LAB to job worker's factory at Ranipet. Whether, First respondent s [LexDoc Id : 501439]
|
HC (Madras) |
2016 |
Tamilnadu Petroproducts Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner and Ors.
Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act 1959: Concessional rate of tax-Transaction done by petitioner factually not disputed, Petitioner entitled to avail concessional rate of tax on submission of Form-XVII declaration-
Whether the petitioner was entitled to the benefit of concessional rate of tax under section 3(3) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act 1959. [LexDoc Id : 501217]
|
HC (Madras) |
2016 |
Superintendent of Police and Ors. vs Villupuram Salai Ora Viyabarigal Pothu Nala Sangam and Ors.
Hawking business: Implementation of Act as regards Villupuram Town in very advanced stage-No further orders necessary, Petition closed-
Whether the petition praying to allow running of business of hawking in pursuance of an earlier judgment whereby the members of petitioner were [LexDoc Id : 501164]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Subhash Chandra Upadhyay and Ors. vs Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
Request for cancellation of allotment of retail outlet dealership-Entire things engineered by petitioner to defeat rights of another candidate, Petitions dismissed-
Whether the high court could accept the request of petitioner, who was insisting that candidature of another candidate in all eventuality was li [LexDoc Id : 501163]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2016 |
M. Selvam vs Municipal Corpn. and Ors.
Challenge to tender process: Failure of petitioner to substantiate averments in petition-Tender conducted in accordance with rules and regulations, Petition dismissed-
Whether the petition seeking certiorarified mandamus to call for records pertaining to the tender called for collection of fees and the subseque [LexDoc Id : 501159]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Isha Distribution House (P) Ltd. vs Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd. and Ors.
Territorial jurisdiction to entertain suit-Bangalore office of first defendant integral to transactions between parties-
Whether the cause of action, on the basis of which instant suit was instituted, came within the territorial jurisdiction of the Calcutta High Cour [LexDoc Id : 501154]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Charmaine Kaula and Ors. vs Ratan Kaula and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 501152]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Kartikey Ispat (P) Ltd. vs CTT
[LexDoc Id : 500919]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2016 |
Charmaine Kaula and Ors. vs Ratan Kaula and Ors.
Approval of sale-Order XXI Rule 90 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908. Right or interest to question-In this third party execution appeals Appellants questioned approval of sale, given by single judge. Whether in terms of Order XXI Rule 90 or in any o [LexDoc Id : 500776]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Bakshi Security and Personnel Services (P) Ltd. vs Devkishan Computed (P) Ltd. and Ors.
-- [LexDoc Id : 500426]
|
SC |
2016 |
State of Gujarat vs CEAT Ltd.
Validity of entry in proper schedule-Entry 97 and Entry 95 of Schedule II A of Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969. Electronic goods.-Gujarat Sales Tax Tribunal held that product in question would be covered under part (D) of entry 97 of Schedule II A of Act and not under entry 95 of [LexDoc Id : 500915]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
