Register free! 
Banking - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 3219   
Title Forum  Year
Arvind Bhartiya Vidhyalya Samiti vs ACIT Exemption: Educational institution-Absence of profit motive-AY 2003-04. The assessee 'samiti' was running various institutions and colleges for imparting education. The receipts were used for its main objects a [LexDoc Id : 339658]
ITAT (Jaipur) 2008
DDIT vs Bumi Hiway (M) SDN BHD Rejection of accounts-Percentage completion of contract method-AY 2001-02. The assessee executed a contract starting from October 1999 and ending on 21 August 2001. It followed percentage completion of contract me [LexDoc Id : 339250]
ITAT (Delhi) 2008
JCIT vs National Airport Authority of India [LexDoc Id : 336740]
ITAT (Delhi) 2008
National Agricultural Co-op Federation of India Ltd. vs JCIT and ACIT Accrual of interest liability-Interest on arbitration award-AY 1996-97 to AY 1998-99. In arbitration proceedings the buyer of the assessee had prayed for future interest at 18 percent in addition to interest aw [LexDoc Id : 336427]
ITAT (Delhi) 2008
CIT vs Pawan Kumar Jain Income from export-Business income: Interest held as business income, Adjustment of interest-AY 2001-02. The assessee had taken a loan from a bank against pledge of some fixed deposits receipts. The AO gave a specific finding that the interest [LexDoc Id : 336097]
HC (Delhi) 2008
CIT vs Ambuja Darla Karsog Mangu Transport Co-op. Society Ltd. Appeal to High Court: Substantial question of law-Liability to deduct TDS-The question whether the assessee was liable to make TDS under s.194C on payments made to Truck operators society was a substantial question of law.< [LexDoc Id : 335118]
SC 2008
CIT vs Virgo Marketing (P) Ltd. Penalty- Concealment of income-Non-recording of satisfaction by AO-AY 2000-01 to AY 2002-03. The perusal of the assessment order did not show why the AO chose to initiate penalty proceedings. No penalty could be levie [LexDoc Id : 334308]
HC (Delhi) 2008
CIT vs Atul Mohan Bindal [LexDoc Id : 334067]
HC (Delhi) 2008
CIT vs H.F.C.L. Infotel Ltd. Appeal to High court-Territorial jurisdiction of court-AY 1998-1999. The appellate orders were passed by the Tribunal at Chennai. Later assessee's case was shifted to Punjab. The appeal was maintainable in [LexDoc Id : 394970]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2008
CIT and Anr. vs D. Meenakshi Net Wealth-Share of assets in trust-The assessee was a member of the BOIs. The BOIs were beneficiaries of a trust. They were not entitled to any specific/definite share in assets of the [LexDoc Id : 380711]
HC (Karnataka) 2008
Cottanad Plantations Ltd. vs Inspecting Assistant Commissioner (Special) and Ors. Depreciation: Agricultural Income Tax-Compounding of tax-AY 2001-02 and AY 2002-03. The assessee opted to payment of tax under compounding scheme from earlier regular assessment. No depreciation was allowabl [LexDoc Id : 372978]
HC (Kerala) 2008
Sushila and Ors. vs UOI and Ors. Validity of: Attachment and sale of property-No tax liability on date of transfer of property-On the date of sale of property by the assessee, there was no tax liability. The sale was made after getting a clearance certificate from the AO under [LexDoc Id : 345120]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2008
Saroj Sales Organisation vs ITO Deduction: Income from housing project-Eligible and ineligible projects constructed under single plan-AY 2005-06. Another person viz. Conwood Agencies Pvt. Ltd. obtained sanction of plant from Municipal corporation for a plot for construction of 11 win [LexDoc Id : 340228]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2008
Saroj Sales Organisation vs ITO [LexDoc Id : 340045]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2008
Ravindra D. Trivedi vs CIT Additions to income-Income admitted under s.132(4)-The assessee had surrender an income of Rs.3 lakhs during the search. This statement was corroborated by the statement of his son who was working as a [LexDoc Id : 338449]
HC (Rajasthan) 2008
Ajay Kumar Shah Jagati vs CIT Capital gains: Transfer of land-Evidence of: Transfer of land-AY 1989-90. The assessee had agreed to sell certain land to Kumaon Construction Ltd. for Rs. 25 lakhs. The total land measured 7000 sq. meters. The la [LexDoc Id : 335889]
SC 2008
CIT and Anr. vs V.G. Siddartha Colorable device-vis-ŕ-vis sharing of profit-Avoidance of tax-Ay-1994-1995. The assessee an individual had received a large amount from ‘MPL’ as seed money for commencement of his business. The money was received [LexDoc Id : 394106]
HC (Karnataka) 2008
CIT and Anr. vs Mysore Paper Mills Ltd. Appeal to High court-Computation of book-profits- provision for bad debts-Ay-2001-2002. The provision made for bad debts could not be added back to book-profits under s.115JB. No substantial question of law arose.
S.115 [LexDoc Id : 390620]
HC (Karnataka) 2008
Devi Ahilya New Cloth Market Co. Ltd. vs CIT Doctrine of: Mutuality-Interest earned on bank deposits-AY 1995-96. The assessee was a company in the nature of mutual association, formed by certain shopkeepers, essentially for the benefit of its members [LexDoc Id : 361642]
HC (Madhya Pradesh) 2008
ITO vs Farouk D. Vevaina Annual letting value of self-occupied house-Owning two self occupied houses-AY 2001-02. The assessee owned two residential flats and used them as his own residence. The annual letting value of only one part could be taken as n [LexDoc Id : 354275]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2008
CIT vs Alpine Solvex Ltd. Income derived from industrial undertaking-Sale of old and spare gunny bags- AY 1993-94. The income derived from sale of old and spare gunny bags was not entitled to special deduction, since it was not derived from industrial [LexDoc Id : 350267]
HC (Madhya Pradesh) 2008
Hans Raj Raj Kumar vs CIT Reference to High Court-Infructuous reference-AY 1976-77 and AY 1977-78. A search was conducted at premises of the assesse under s.132. Inspite of notices under s.134(2) no return was filed. The A [LexDoc Id : 338455]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2008
CIT vs Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. Writ against Notice under s.148-Alternate remedy-The assessee challanged the notice under s.148 on the point of satisfaction recorded by the AO. The assessee could submit the facts before the AO. The [LexDoc Id : 338450]
HC (Rajasthan) 2008
Walchand Capital Ltd. vs DCIT [LexDoc Id : 338388]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2008
Ramnord Research Laboratories (P) Ltd. vs WTO ‘Assets’: Business Assets-Property given on rent-The assessee company had given its premises on rent on leave and licence basis. It carried no business in the said premise. The value of the said prop [LexDoc Id : 336991]
HC (Bombay) 2008
 
First | Prev | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | Next | Last