| First | Prev | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 3219 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Ramanand Electro Coats vs State of Kerala
[LexDoc Id : 368682]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2008 |
CIT vs B. Sumangaladevi
Validity of notice for re-assessment-Notice issued by an AO lower in rank than DCIT-AY 1990-91. The notice issued under s.148 by an AO lower in rank than DCIT was invalid.
S.148(1) and s.151(2) of the Income Tax Act 1961 [LexDoc Id : 368330]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2008 |
CIT vs B. Sumangaladevi
Appeal to High court-Validity of notice issued under s.148-AY 1987-88. The Tribunal had held that the notice issued under s.148 was invalid and consequent re-assessment was to be quashed. No substantial questi [LexDoc Id : 365603]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2008 |
Tas Holding (P) Ltd. vs Punjab and Sind Bank
[LexDoc Id : 342488]
|
DRAT |
2008 |
Methodex Systems (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
Pre-emptive purchase of: Immovable Property-Right of tenant-The petitioners claimed a right in the property as tenants relying on a decree in their favour from the Court. The notice served on them under s.269UE [LexDoc Id : 338438]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Essar Projects Ltd. vs DCIT, ITO, ACIT and JCIT
[LexDoc Id : 338096]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2008 |
Vivek Jain vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 337342]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2008 |
DCIT vs ABG Heavy Industries Ltd.
Deduction: Income from infrastructure facility-Installation and maintenance of cranes at port-AY 1997-98 and AY 1998-99. The assessee entered into two contracts with JNPT, a port trust, for supply, installation, testing commissioning and mainte [LexDoc Id : 336713]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2008 |
Infosys Automation System Ltd. and Ors. vs Oriental Bank of Commerce
[LexDoc Id : 336117]
|
DRAT |
2008 |
CIT vs Jannhavi Investments (P) Ltd.
Capital gains: When no cost of acquisition-Sale of coupons: Coupons received with non-convertible debentures, Law applicable-The coupons received with non-convertible debentures were not a "security". There was no cost of acquisition. Therefore, on their sale no capital gain [LexDoc Id : 335445]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
CIT vs Jannhavi Investments (P) Ltd.
Capital gains-Cost of acquisition: Coupons received with non-convertible debentures-The assesse received certain coupons along with non-convertible debentures. There was no cost of acquisition for the coupons. The said coupons were no [LexDoc Id : 335397]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
CIT vs Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti and Ors.
Charitable Purpose-Object of providing public amenities-The assessee was a market samiti established under a State Act with the object of providing market, roads and other public amenities. The object was c [LexDoc Id : 335396]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2008 |
Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Wealth Tax and Anr.
Freezing value of residential house-Applicability of s.7(2) of the Wealth Tax Act 1957-The assessee rented out the house. The s.7(2) was not applicable since it applies to a residential house exclusively used by the assessee for his own [LexDoc Id : 335034]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) (P) Ltd. and Anr. vs UOI and Ors.
Validity of: Re-assessment-Re-opening on basis of retracted statement of lender-AY 1974-75 to AY 1981-82. The re-opening of assessment on the basis of the retracted statement of person who has since died was not valid. The documen [LexDoc Id : 333814]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Methodrex Systems (P) Ltd., Methodex Business Systems and Bipin .B. Shah vs UOI, CIT and IT
[LexDoc Id : 333601]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Ashok Kumar Shrivastava and Ors. vs Ram Lal and Ors.
Regularisation of services-Seniority of an employee-The Supreme Court held that an employee could count his seniority only from the date of regularisation of his services. [LexDoc Id : 331752]
|
SC |
2008 |
Sunil Poddar and Ors. vs UOI, Union Bank of India
Suit for recovery of loan transfer to DRT-Maintainability-An ex-parte order passed by the DRT directing recovery from the appellants was confirmed by the Supreme Court. The appellant’s contention that they we [LexDoc Id : 331578]
|
SC |
2008 |
DCIT vs Maharaja Shopping Complex
Business income vs Income from property-Sub-letting shopping complex with facilities-AY 1995-96. The assessee took land as sub-lessee and constructed a shopping complex and let it out to various tenants. The letting was also with certa [LexDoc Id : 363120]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2008 |
Santokh Singh and Ors. vs Central Bank of India and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 354013]
|
DRAT (Delhi) |
2008 |
Sasisri Extractions Ltd. vs ACIT
Actual cost-Subsidy received, Subsidy as incentive for setting up industry-AY 2003-04. The assesee received subsidy from state government as incentive for setting up industry in the state. The subsidy received was not a payme [LexDoc Id : 353947]
|
ITAT (Vishakapatnam) |
2008 |
Sahib Ram Giri vs ITO and Ors.
Validity of Re-assessment proceedings-Non-availability certain documents-AY 1994-95. The assessment made was re-opened after recording reasons under s.148(2). The copy of the reasons recorded was supplied to the assessee. T [LexDoc Id : 343899]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2008 |
CIT vs Madhwan Bashyam
Limitation for re-assessment-Assessment of agent of the non-resident-AY 1996-97. The notice under s.148 for AY 1996-97 was issued on 14 January 2000 and was served on 31 January 2000. The notice could be served on or be [LexDoc Id : 332266]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2008 |
Commissioner of Income Central vs Suresh N. Gupta
Block-assessment: Levy of surcharge-Law-Applicable-Block-period: AY 1991-92 to AY 2000-01. The search under s.132 was conducted on 17 January 2001. Even de hors proviso to s.113 inserted w.e.f. 1 June [LexDoc Id : 331579]
|
SC |
2008 |
Matrix Logistics Ltd. vs CIT
Validity of revision by CIT-Order of AO not erroneous-In allowing deductions under s.36(1)(vii), the AO had taken a possible view under law. His order was not erroneous. the order under s.263 was not vali [LexDoc Id : 373013]
|
ITAT (Ahmedabad) |
2008 |
V.K. Subramanian vs ACIT
Rate of tax: NRI becoming resident-Non-resident becoming resident-AY 1988-89 to 1991-92. The assessee when he was non-resident invested certain amount in India in a bank and earned interest as NRI. The interest incom [LexDoc Id : 372973]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2008 |
| |
| First | Prev | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | Next | Last |
| |
