| First | Prev | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 3219 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Vedicattu Engg. Co. vs CIT
Validity of: Revision by CIT-Wrong computation of income by AO, Erroneous order-The assessee was a contractor. It's income was assessed at 10 percent of the gross receipts. Later, it received compensation on arbitration award. The [LexDoc Id : 345118]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2008 |
Vedicaltu Engg. Co. vs CIT
Validity of Revision by CIT -Arbitration award in contractor's case-The assessee was a contractor engaged in civil work. It was assessed at 10 percent of the contract receipts. The arbitration award received was fully [LexDoc Id : 343945]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2008 |
Muthoot Bankers vs ITO
Deductions from income: Cash system-Interest paid to a minor admitted as partner-AY 1991-92. The assessee, a partnership firm was engaged in money lending and was following cash system. It showed payment to a partner, who was minor [LexDoc Id : 343098]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2008 |
CIT vs Divine Leasing and Finance Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 340468]
|
SC |
2008 |
S. Rajamony vs ACIT
Appeal to High court-Determination of undisclosed income-Block period: 1 April 1995 to 28 March 2002. The CIT (Appeals) reduced the undisclosed income, which was affirmed by the Tribunal. This was a finding [LexDoc Id : 340434]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2008 |
Bajrang Lal Garg vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 338386]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2008 |
DCIT vs Suniti Singh
Capital gains: Where no cost of acquisition-Sale of calves raised in dairy farm-AY 1991-92. The assessee was running a dairy farm for production and selling of milk. In the process certain calves were raised. The assessee was not [LexDoc Id : 337969]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2008 |
CIT vs Vardhman Polytex Ltd.
Deduction: Interest on borrowed capital-Loan borrowed for setting up new unit-AY 1993-94. The assessee had borrowed loan for setting up a new unit. The new machinery was not put to use. The interest on loan could not be allowed [LexDoc Id : 334487]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2008 |
CIT vs Vardhman Polytex Ltd.
Actual cost-Interest on borrowed capital-The interest on borrowed capital, borrowed for purchase of capital asset, was to be included in actual cost before the asset was put to use.
[LexDoc Id : 332903]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2008 |
CIT vs Samir Synthetics Mill
Appeal to High court-Suppression of sales-The finding of Tribunal that reduced addition was justified was a finding of fact.
S.145 and s.260A of the Income Tax Act 1961 [LexDoc Id : 397757]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2008 |
Claridges Hotel (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
Penalty: Concealment of income-Deductions claimed under bonafide belief-AY 1990-91. The deductions under s.32AB and under s.80HHD were claimed under a bonafide belief. All the necessary details were filed. No penalty could [LexDoc Id : 359566]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2008 |
Preeti Tex vs ITO
Bad debt-Irrecoverable price of exported goods-AY 2003-04. The assessee had exported goods to a foreign buyer. The goods reached the custom station in Bangladesh and then were destroyed by fire. Th [LexDoc Id : 344772]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2008 |
I.T.I. Capital Markets Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 343966]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2008 |
CIT vs Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti
Charitable trust: Object of general public utility-Samiti for protection of farmers' interest-The assessee 'Samiti' was formed under the State Act to protect interests of farmers. The fee charged was applied for its object. This was an object o [LexDoc Id : 343287]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2008 |
Genesis Overseas (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
Penalty: Concealment of income-Non-recording of satisfaction by AO-AY 2001-02. In the assessment order, the AO had only stated, penalty proceedings under s.271(1)(c ) are seperately initiated. The requisite condition [LexDoc Id : 343048]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2008 |
ITO vs R.K. Gupta
Validity of re-assessment-Non-issue of notice under s.143(2)-The assessee informed the AO that no notice under s.143(2) was received after issue of notice under s.148. The re-assessment made without serving noti [LexDoc Id : 342788]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2008 |
East West Hotels Ltd. vs DCIT
Income from business vs Income from other sources-Lease of hotel for a long period-AY 1989-90. The assessee had set up a hotel. It leased the said hotel to another company, Indian Hotels Co. Ltd. for 33 years with option to Indian Ho [LexDoc Id : 342764]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2008 |
Karnataka Power Corpn. Ltd. vs JT, ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 342662]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2008 |
K.K. Khullar vs DCIT
Accrual of income: Cash system-Income to the extent of services rendered, Advance received from clients-AY 2002-03. The assessee was an advocate. He was following cash system. He received certain as advance or retainer ship fee for services to be rendere [LexDoc Id : 342438]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2008 |
DCIT vs Modi Rubber Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 341302]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2008 |
Deccan Cements Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 340200]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2008 |
JCIT vs Khanna and Anndhanam
Business Income-Compensation received for withdrawing from partnership-AY 1997-98. The assessee was a firm of practicing Chartered Accountants. It had entered into a concurrent membership of a conglomeration of term of Ch [LexDoc Id : 339984]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2008 |
ACIT vs Muthoot Bankers
[LexDoc Id : 338897]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2008 |
Avinash D. Deshmukh and Anr. vs Central Bank of India and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 337580]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Jayram Rajgopal Poduval vs ACIT
Residential status: Law applicable-Not ordinarily resident (NRO)-AY 2001-02. The assessee was non-resident in India in nine out of ten previous years preceding the relevant previous year. Therefore, his status was t [LexDoc Id : 335994]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2008 |
| |
| First | Prev | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | Next | Last |
| |
