| First | Prev | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 3219 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Sona Systems and Home Appliance (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 338898]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2008 |
ACIT vs P.S. Pasricha
Exemption: Capital gains-Sale of residential house and purchase of another house-AY 2001-02. On sale of residential house the capital gains were worked out at Rs 1.24 crores. After sale he purchased a commercial property for 1.25 c [LexDoc Id : 336715]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2008 |
Energy Infrastructure (India) Ltd. vs DCIT
Rectification of mistake-Rectification of intimation under s.143(1)(a)-
AY 2001-02 and AY 2002-03. The income returned was accepted vide order under s.143(1). The assessee moved application for rectification so as to cap [LexDoc Id : 335328]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2008 |
Sierra Inds Enterprises (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 334629]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2008 |
DCIT vs Hero Honda Motors Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 334406]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2008 |
Krishna Dnyandeo Lad vs Rahmatpur Panchkrushi Shishan Mandal and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 334390]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
DLF Universal Ltd. vs CIT
Duty of Tribunal: Law of precedent-Reference to larger bench of Tribunal-AY 1992-93. It is a matter of precedent that when one Bench of the Tribunal had taken a view on an issue, the later Bench cannot pass a contrary order [LexDoc Id : 332372]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2008 |
CIT vs Saraya Industries Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 332179]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2008 |
CIT vs E I Dupont India Ltd.
Computation of book profits-Provisions made for: (a) Doubtful debts, (b) Damaged stocks-useless-obsolete stock, (c ) Shortage in stock due to leakage in storage and transportation-AY 1999-2000. The provisions made related to ascertained liability. The accounts were made as per part II and III of schedule VI of the Companies Act. [LexDoc Id : 332177]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2008 |
CIT vs Ram Niwas
Amount borrowed-repaid on ‘Hundi’-‘Hundi’ vs Bilateral transaction-AY 1998-99. During the search, a document was found on the letter head of the assessee from the premises of Kamal Chand Jain. This was treated as a hu [LexDoc Id : 332024]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2008 |
Kurla Nagrik Sahkari Co-op. Bank Ltd. vs ITO
Co-operative society: Income from banking business-Income from parking of seized vehicles, etc.-AY 2003-04. The assessee was a co-operative bank. It was advancing loans to purchase of vehicles. The income from parking of seized vehicles of the de [LexDoc Id : 353784]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2008 |
Mysore Spun Silks (P) Ltd. vs Karnataka State Financial Corpn.
[LexDoc Id : 352595]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2008 |
H.P. Mineral and Industrial Development Corpn. vs CIT
Accrual of income-Waiver of interest on loans-AY 1982-83. The assessee was following mercantile system of accounts. It passed a resolution to waive the interest on loan to its subsidiary after clo [LexDoc Id : 345123]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2008 |
Utkal Galvanizers (P) Ltd. vs ACIT and Anr.
Rectification of mistake-Doctrine of: Merger with CIT (Appeals) order-AY 1991-92. The AO had disallowed the claim of depreciation which was appealed against. The order of the AO merged with that of the CIT (Appeals). The [LexDoc Id : 334834]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2008 |
ITO vs Ellora Silk Mills (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 333880]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2008 |
CIT vs Micro Land Ltd.
Business expenditure-Attire expenses of employees-Ay-1995-1996. The Tribunal had allowed 50% of the attire expenses of employees without giving any reasons. [The case remanded to Tribunal.]
S.37( [LexDoc Id : 392105]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2008 |
CIT and Anr. vs Vysya Bank
[LexDoc Id : 387696]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2008 |
CIT and Anr. vs Karnataka Vidyuth Kharkhane Ltd.
Limitation for re-assessment-Change in law-AY 1994-95. The notice dated 11 October 1999 under s.148 was served on the assessee on 30 October 1999. A proviso to s.148 was inserted w.e.f. 1 Octob [LexDoc Id : 366246]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2008 |
CIT and Anr. vs Vysya Bank Ltd.
Business expenditure-Fee paid to SEBI-AY 1991-92. The assessee bank had paid certain sum as "Authorisation fee" to SEBI. The sum paid was deductible as business expenditure.
Rule o [LexDoc Id : 365607]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2008 |
Probal Gupta vs Burdwan Central Co-op. Bank Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 351818]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2008 |
IRB Infrastructure Ltd. vs ITO
Rule of consistency-Method of accounts-AY 2001-02. The assessee was in the construction of infrastructure facility of a rail over-bridge, under a BOT scheme. On completion of bridge, it sta [LexDoc Id : 346620]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2008 |
Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. vs WTO and Anr.
Dates of Tribunal-Failure of Tribunal to consider the question raised-Since the Tribunal had omitted to consider the question raised regarding application of exception (3) of S.2(ea)(i) the issue was remanded to the Trib [LexDoc Id : 343901]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
ITO vs Magnum Plasticizers and Allied Products (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 337235]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2008 |
Niba India and B.D. Sanghvi vs Arti Handa, CBDT and UOI
Validity of re-assessment-Alleged non-disclosure of scrap-AY 1977-78 and AY 1978-79. In the assessee's manufacturing process, scrap was generated. In original assessment all the facts were before the AO. The [LexDoc Id : 332908]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
J.P. Srivastava and Sons (Rampur) (P) Ltd. vs ITO
Cost of acquisition-Cost as on 1 April 1981-AY 1997-98. The land sold by the assessee was purchased in 1976. The FMV of the said land was determined by Tribunal as on 1 April 1981 at Rs. 40 per [LexDoc Id : 332178]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2008 |
| |
| First | Prev | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | Next | Last |
| |
