| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 2802 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
DCIT vs MDS Switchgear Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 352345]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2007 |
Sahi Agro Food (P) Ltd. vs Andhra Bank and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 349511]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2007 |
ACIT vs Real Image Media Technologies (P) Ltd.
Deduction on actual payment-Service Tax billed but not received-AY 2002-03. The assessee was running a recording and dubbing studio, production of advertisement, films and Television Serials etc., as well as in sof [LexDoc Id : 345902]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2007 |
Tej Pratap Singh vs ACIT
Computation of: capital gains-DVO’s report-The capital gains were to be computed on the basis of consideration received and not on the basis of market value determined by the DVO.
S.48 [LexDoc Id : 342143]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
Samtel Color Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 339985]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
Makarand Gadre vs ACIT
Accrual of income: Place of accrual-Shares acquired under ESOP: Sale of shares-AY 2000-01 and AY 2001-02. The assessee joined service with Microsoft Corporation of USA. During his service in USA with Microsoft Corporation he had [LexDoc Id : 339892]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2007 |
Pawan Singal vs UOI and Ors.
Validity of Amendments to s.245D and s.245HA-Interim Relief-The assessee -petitioner had challenged the validity of amendments made to s.245D and s.245HA by Finance Act 200. Pending final disposal of the writ. [LexDoc Id : 339839]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2007 |
Kuldeep Rai vs ED
[LexDoc Id : 339404]
|
ATFE (Delhi) |
2007 |
Rohitash Yadav vs ITO
Unexplained expenditure-Alleged low household withdrawals-In absence of any evidence no addition to income could be made on the alleged low household withdrawals.
S.69 of the Income Tax Act 196 [LexDoc Id : 339380]
|
ITAT (Jaipur) |
2007 |
Professional Warehousing Co. (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
Limitation for assessment-Exclusion of time taken for special audit-Since, the AO had passed an order for conducting special audit, the period taken for conduct of special audit was to be excluded for computing the lim [LexDoc Id : 338103]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
M.S. Raju vs DCIT
Revision by Commissioner of Income Tax-Revision on basis of record-AY 2002-03. For exercising power of revision under s.264, the CIT could only deal with record of assessment producing. Unlike provision of s.263, the [LexDoc Id : 336094]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2007 |
Manoj Kumar Gupta vs ITO
Genuineness of cash credits-Source of creditor-The assessee had filed supporting evidence regarding the source of the creditor. The evidence filed was not verified by the AO. The AO could not disre [LexDoc Id : 335992]
|
ITAT (Jaipur) |
2007 |
B.R. Industries vs ITO
Business expenditure-Provision for advocates fee-The assessee followed merchantile system. The provision made for advocate's fee was deductible.
S.37(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 [LexDoc Id : 335734]
|
ITAT (Jaipur) |
2007 |
Poysha Oxygen (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
Business income of a company-Activity ultra-vires of MOA-For deciding whether a particular activity of the company was business activity or not it was business activity or not it was not relevant to see whet [LexDoc Id : 333942]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
Tata Elxsi Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 332263]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2007 |
Haden International Group India (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
Penalty: Concealment of income-Wrong claim of deduction-AY 1999-2000. The assessee claimed deduction of provision for bad debts. It claimed that the said provision was disallowed in AY 1997-98. In fact no s [LexDoc Id : 335879]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2007 |
ACIT vs Carborundum Universal Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 345822]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2007 |
Hindustan Gum and Chemicals Ltd. vs ITO
Business expenditure-Prior period expenditure-The AO assessed during AY 2003-04 certain prior period income i.e. income relating to earlier assessment years. He also had to allow prior period expe [LexDoc Id : 344641]
|
ITAT (Calcutta) |
2007 |
LMJ International Ltd. vs DCIT
Assessment in search cases-Assessment of person not searched, Undisclosed income deducted in search-AY 1999-2000. A search was conducted on the premise of Jayant Kumar a director of the assessee company. No undisclosed income of the assessee was dedu [LexDoc Id : 342202]
|
ITAT (Calcutta) |
2007 |
Enercon Wind Farms (Krishna) Ltd. vs ACIT
Deduction: Export oriented unit-Computation of income of export oriented unit-AY 2001-02. The expression total income under s.10B(1) meant the total income as computed under the Act. After so computing the income of Export Orien [LexDoc Id : 338101]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2007 |
Skyline Caterers (P) Ltd. vs ITO
Depreciation: Intangible asset-Right under a contract-AY 2003-04. The ‘R’ was a contractor providing catering services to HLL. The assessee took over the right under the said contract with HLL from ‘R’ on [LexDoc Id : 335875]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2007 |
Maruti Nandan Finance Cap. (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
Penalty: Loan taken in cash-Reasonable cause: Business need-AY 2002-03. The assessee had issued a cheque. To avoid dishonour of the cheque he took a loan of Rs. five lakhs from its director in cash. The directo [LexDoc Id : 335738]
|
ITAT (Ahmedabad) |
2007 |
Glenmark Laboratories Ltd. vs DCIT
Deduction: Income from exports-Computation of deduction: Allocation of cost attributable to Duty Entitlement Pass Book receipts, Direct Cost of Exports-AY 2002-03. The assesee was exporting goods. It had also earned Duty Entitlement Pass Book receipts. There was loss on export of goods, but profit if [LexDoc Id : 331276]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2007 |
Kumar Chemicals and Fertilisers (P) Ltd. vs Andhra Pradesh Industrial Development Corpn. Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 346351]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2007 |
CIT vs Hero Cycles (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 332139]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2007 |
| |
| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
