| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 288 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Travancore Devaswom Board vs Deputy Examiner of Local Fund Audit, Thiruvananthapuram and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 533662]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2018 |
Savan Godiawala in His Capacity of Liquidator @ Lanco Infratech Ltd. vs Steel Authority of India Ltd. and Ors.
Injunction-Encashment of bank guarantee-Petitioner seeks an injunction order against the respondent no. 1 from in any manner acting upon the impugned Termination Notice. Held, Respondent no. [LexDoc Id : 533706]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Tamil Nadu Waste Management Ltd. vs Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corpn. Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 533704]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
CCE, Customs and Service Tax vs Binani Zinc Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 533510]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2018 |
Sony Tariang vs Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council and Ors.
Order of revocation-Violation of principal of natural justice-Respondents passed order of revocation against Petitioner on basis that received certain complaints against Petitioner for not deposited the annual pr [LexDoc Id : 533413]
|
HC (Assam) |
2018 |
Vilelie Khamo and Ors. vs Vikram Infrastructure Co. and Ors.
Equitable remedy-Responsive bid-Ministry of Road, Transport and Highway issued a Notice Inviting Bid (NIB) for construction of 2 Lane/2 Lane with Paved Shoulders Configuration of Cap [LexDoc Id : 533412]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2018 |
C.C. vs Ashirvad Agro Processors
[LexDoc Id : 533498]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2018 |
Mahindra Sanyo Special Steel (P) Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
Writ of mandamus-Validity of bid-Appellant sought issuance of writ of mandamus to the Rail Wheel Factory, Indian Railways-the respondent No. 2-to include and consider the appellant-pe [LexDoc Id : 533414]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
Ram Abhoshan vs PEC Ltd.
Net Trading Margin of Sale of Gold-Change in policy-Appellant is a proprietorship concern engaged in trading of gold and bullion. The respondent is one of the eight agencies, as notified by the Director [LexDoc Id : 533567]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. vs Commissioner of Commercial Tax
Application to recall-Ex-parte order-Present revision petition was raised against order of Commercial Tax Tribunal in respect of rejecting application to recall ex-parte order which was p [LexDoc Id : 533537]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2018 |
S.N. Electricals vs NBCC Service Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 533564]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
OTIS Elevator Co. India Ltd. vs State of Kerala and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 533536]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2018 |
Motherson Sumi Systems Ltd. vs C.G.ST C and C.E.
[LexDoc Id : 533448]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2018 |
Andritz Hydro (P) Ltd. vs SJVN Ltd. and Ors.
Bid conditions-Accommodation-Petitioner’s bid was rejected by Respondent. Whether, bid submitted by Respondent No. 2 contained variation/deviation of a critical provision. Held, i [LexDoc Id : 533563]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2018 |
Tata Teleservices (Maha.) Ltd. vs Commissioner of Service Tax
[LexDoc Id : 533438]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2018 |
Reji Jose vs CTO and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 533089]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2018 |
Intelligence Officer, Sqad No. II, Department of Commercial Taxes and Ors. vs Cochin Blue Metal Industries (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Imposition of compounding fees-Enhancement-Whether, impugned order passed by Assessing authority and Appellate authority should be set aside. Held, purposive interpretation to the proviso and t [LexDoc Id : 533088]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2018 |
Central Power Distribution Co. of A.P. Ltd. and Ors. vs Consumer Grievances Redressal forum of APCPDCL and Ors.
Jurisdiction-Section 42(5) of electricity Act, 2003. Consolidate of laws.-Appellant challenged decision of Redressal Forum. Whether a writ petition filed by a distribution licensee is to be entertained or not depends upon th [LexDoc Id : 533160]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2018 |
Prosper Jewel Arcade LLP vs Deputy Commissioner Commercial Taxes and Ors.
Re-assessment-Section 62 of the KVAT Act, 2003. Endorsement.-Petitioner sought rectification in the said Order also came to be rejected by the Assessing Authority vide endorsement. Whether rectification sought b [LexDoc Id : 533087]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
Bhushan Pharmaceuticals (P) Ltd. vs Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 533193]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
MI2C Security Facilities (P) Ltd. vs North Delhi Municipal Corpn.
Tender Evaluation-PF contribution-Petitioner sought direction against Respondent Corporation to comply with statutory obligation to pay/release incremental wages including minimum wage [LexDoc Id : 533192]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Karamhans Food (P) Ltd. vs State of Jammu and Kashmir and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 532557]
|
HC (Jammu and Kashmir) |
2018 |
Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi vs Yasikan Enterprises (P) Ltd.
Existence of arbitration clause-Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Setting aside of award-Whether, there was arbitration clause as such arbitration proceedings valid and award passed cannot be set aside. Held, as per Section 7 of the Act, e [LexDoc Id : 532555]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Ramesan P. and Ors. vs T. Asokan and Ors.
Rejection of bids-Article 14 of the Constitution of India, 1950. Entitlement to Government orders-Whether, in absence of stipulation in NITs that price preference would be given to certain Societies, benefit of Government Order, as amended could be [LexDoc Id : 532554]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2018 |
I.T.I. Ltd. vs State of Kerala
[LexDoc Id : 533636]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2018 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
