| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 288 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Shyju Antony vs Joseph Vilangadan and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 523528]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2018 |
Umesh Prasad Rai Grocery vs State of Assam and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 523278]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2018 |
Carpo Power Ltd. vs State of Haryana and Ors.
Issuance of ‘C’ Forms-Sections 2 (b), (d), 7 (2), 8 of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Rules7, 12 of Central Sales Tax (Registration and Turnover) Rules, 1957. Section 174 of Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Haryana Goods and Service Tax, 2017. Applicability of act-Petitioner has challenged respondents' refusal to issue 'C' Forms in respect of natural gas purchased and sought mandamus directing respondents to iss [LexDoc Id : 525244]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2018 |
Patanjali Ayurved Ltd. vs State of Bihar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 523283]
|
HC (Patna) |
2018 |
Vasavadatta Cement vs State of Karnataka
[LexDoc Id : 524919]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
T. Murugan vs Commissioner, Nagercoil Municipality
[LexDoc Id : 523274]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2018 |
Municipal Corpn., Ujjain and Ors. vs BVG India Ltd. and Ors.
Independent evaluation of bids-Power of High Court-Whether the High Court is justified in independently evaluating the technical bids and financial bids of the parties, as an appellate authority, for c [LexDoc Id : 523013]
|
SC |
2018 |
North Delhi Municipal Corpn. and Ors. vs Sanjeev Kumar
Pendente lite interest-Security amount-Whether, pendente lite interest is liable to be granted either on the principal or on the security amount as there was no compliance of Clauses 17 and [LexDoc Id : 523614]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Amarpur Construction Co. (P) Ltd. vs State of Bihar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 523613]
|
HC (Patna) |
2018 |
East Delhi Municipal Corpn. vs Pawan Kumar Suri
Payment of Interest-Illegal-Whether, unconscionable and illegal for Corporation to argue that no interest is payable. Held, view of question of interest having been gone into det [LexDoc Id : 523612]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Reliance Industries Ltd. and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Prospective effect to judgment-Section 52 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Determination of disputed questions-Whether the MSTT ought to have given prospective effect to its judgment as contemplated under section 52(2) of the BST Act. Held, ex-facie clear from [LexDoc Id : 523388]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2018 |
S.B. Agencies vs State of Karnataka, ACCT
Deduction-Taxable turnover-Whether, tribunal is justified in remand of case. Held, order of said learned Tribunal was justified in remanding the case back to the assessee author [LexDoc Id : 526771]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
S.D.R. Wines vs Addl. Excise and Taxation Commissioner and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 523386]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2018 |
Sardar Electric House vs State of Karnataka and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 523385]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
Md. Saleem Rizvi and Ors. vs State Bank of India, Stressed Assets Resolution Centre Branch and Ors.
Valuation of property-Valuation Report-Whether, petitioners ought not to be permitted to raise issue relating to sale of entire property as a whole, and not floor-wise, at this belated stag [LexDoc Id : 523611]
|
HC (Patna) |
2018 |
Amrutanjan Ltd. vs CTT
[LexDoc Id : 525241]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2018 |
CLIX Finance India (P) Ltd. @ CLIX Finance India Unlimited vs State of Karnataka, Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Validity of reassessment proceedings-Scope of Judicial review-Whether, on facts and circumstances reassessment order was rightly passed against assessee. Held, for Departmental authorities to examine whether the [LexDoc Id : 525240]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
Sujit Sarkar and Ors. vs State of Assam and Ors.
Re-sale notice-Validity-Whether, impugned re-sale notice published in the newspaper was sustainable. Held, professed reason, which is non-publication of the re-sale notice in [LexDoc Id : 523986]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2018 |
Satish Ahuja vs UOI and Ors.
Territorial jurisdiction-Cause of action-Whether, single Judge erred in dismissing the petition for want of territorial jurisdiction. Held, it is clear that dispute has arisen under dealershi [LexDoc Id : 523983]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Prashant vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 523982]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2018 |
Ganadhi Pati Construction (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs State of Bihar and Ors.
Executive action-Article 166 of the Constitution of India, 1950. Approved.-Whether, impugned order can be treated as an executive action of Government as contemplated under Article 166 of Constitution. Held, action was duly a [LexDoc Id : 523981]
|
HC (Patna) |
2018 |
Canara Bank vs Delhi Karnataka Sangha
Mesne profit-Liability-Whether, in facts of case dfendant is liable to pay mesne profits when termination took effect till the date of handing over of possession. Held, Divi [LexDoc Id : 523980]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Kerala State Electricity Board and Ors. vs Kurien E. Kalathil and Ors.
Loss-Contract-Whether, findings of High Court are perverse causing loss to statutory body like Appellant-Board. Held, in present case, for contract of Rs. 7.76 cror [LexDoc Id : 522381]
|
SC |
2018 |
Medipol Pharmaceutical India (P) Ltd. vs State of Bihar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 522879]
|
HC (Patna) |
2018 |
Bundel Khand Advertising Association and Ors. vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
Fresh contract-Extension of term-Whether, certain clause not enforceable between parties to present petition. Held, there under, respondent No. 5 is entitled to work even beyond two y [LexDoc Id : 522878]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2018 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
