| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 288 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Assam Medicine Dealers Association and Ors. vs Guwahati Municipal Corpn. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 528185]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2018 |
Yogendrasinh D. Sisodiya vs Indian Oil Corpn.
[LexDoc Id : 528184]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2018 |
National Highways Authority of India vs L.N. Malviya Infra Projects (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Corrupt practices-Demerged organization-Whether, L.N. Malviya had not acted in any manner that could have led to formation of prima facie opinion that it indulged in fraudulent or corrupt pr [LexDoc Id : 528182]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Aijaz Ahmad Rather vs State of Jammu and Kashmir and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 528181]
|
HC (Jammu and Kashmir) |
2018 |
Alstom Transport India Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 527538]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
State of Goa vs Sneha Constructions and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 527545]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2018 |
Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. and Ors. vs Shree Niwas Rammgopal and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 527559]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2018 |
Techno Power Enterprises (P) Ltd. vs Food Corpn. of India
[LexDoc Id : 527553]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
K.P. Joy vs Government of Kerala and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 527604]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2018 |
Jose Vettikkat vs State of Kerala
[LexDoc Id : 527603]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2018 |
Sardar Ahmad vs Commissioner, EDMC and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 527547]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Steel Authority of India Ltd. vs State of Odisha, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Govt. of Andhra Pradesh and Ors.
State of Odisha vs Steel Authority of India Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 528996]
|
WBTT |
2018 |
State of Karnataka vs Vinayak S. Jadhav
[LexDoc Id : 528993]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
Syed Zakirali vs Syed Zahidali and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 527247]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2018 |
P.B. Manaf vs Eloor Municipality and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 527246]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2018 |
Dhammanagi Property Developers vs Addl. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Revision of assessment-Section 64(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Jurisdiction-Whether the action of the respondent-Authority under section s 64(1) of the Act is justifiable in law. Held, order of the Appellate Authority is not o [LexDoc Id : 529187]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
Jomy Mathew vs Erattupetta Municipality and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 527245]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2018 |
Tandra Das vs Rajib Lochan Das and Ors.
Minimum balance in account-Non-compliance of maintenance-Whether, non-compliance of maintenance of minimum balance in the bank account by the appellant initially resulted in the cancellation of the appellant [LexDoc Id : 527001]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2018 |
Debson Pumps (P) Ltd. vs Gauhati Municipal Corpn. and Ors.
Requirement of tender-Pump water up-Whether, pump water up to the desired level, cannot be brushed aside. Held, pleaded by petitioner that respondent No. 3 had not submitted Single Line [LexDoc Id : 527002]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2018 |
Shree Narmada Aluminium Industries Ltd. vs State of Gujarat
Refund of deposit made in tax department-Section 47(4B) of Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969. Adjustment of dues-Whether, the respondent 2 can be directed to release amount of Rs.79.79 lakhs deposited by petitioner voluntarily. Held, whatever the amount was depos [LexDoc Id : 529184]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2018 |
Sampath vs Director of Municipal Administration and Ors.
Tender conditions-Public interest-Whether, endeavour of petitioner also serves public interest as he suggests that the auction may commence at this amount and the parties may be permit [LexDoc Id : 527000]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2018 |
Baba Loknath Traders vs Kolkata Port Trust and Ors.
Position of proprietor-Tender-Whether, position of a proprietor in respect of his proprietorship firm, and thereafter take a fresh reasoned decision strictly in accordance with law [LexDoc Id : 526998]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2018 |
Indus Mobile Distribution (P) Ltd. vs State of Karnataka, Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Quashing of reassessment order-Section 62 of Karnataka Value Added Taxes Act, 2003. Condonation of delay-Whether, the order passed by 2nd respondent and reassessment order passed by the 3rd respondent can be quashed. Held, provisions of Section 62 of the [LexDoc Id : 529186]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
R.K. and Co. and Ors. vs State of Manipur and Ors.
Tender process-Completion-Whether, tender process should be allowed. Held, as per statement given by director (Social Welfare), Government of Manipur in PIL, there are more tha [LexDoc Id : 526999]
|
MISC |
2018 |
Tamil Nadu Police Housing Corpn. Ltd. vs P and C Projects (P) Ltd.
Rejection of bid-Technical bid-Respondent tender bid was rejected, hence present appeal. Whether in facts and circumstances of case present court should interfere in order passed by [LexDoc Id : 526515]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2018 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
