| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 288 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Shoes East Ltd. vs Delhi Development Authority
[LexDoc Id : 525334]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Kishan Lal and Co. and Ors. vs Addl. Commissioner of Commercial Tax and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 525317]
|
HC (Chhattisgarh) |
2018 |
I. and D. Construction vs State of Uttarakhand and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 525340]
|
HC (Uttarakhand) |
2018 |
Mahibur Rahman and Ors. vs State of Assam and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 525339]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2018 |
Aruna Pator vs Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. (BPCL) and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 525343]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2018 |
Cipla Ltd. vs State of Karnataka, Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Rejection of rectification application-Central Sales Tax Act. Section 69 of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act. Mistake apparent on record-Whether, respondent 3 rightly rejected rectification application under Section 69 of KVAT Act on ground that proceedings under Section 9(2) of the Act [LexDoc Id : 529191]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
Raymond Ltd. vs North Delhi Municipal Corpn.
Discriminatory clause-Adequate time-Whether, clause 12.6 of NIT was discriminatory and arbitrary, and hence must be struck down. Held, while it would not be appropriate for it to comment [LexDoc Id : 524550]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Efkon India (P) Ltd. and Strabag AG Consortium and Ors. vs National Highways Authority of India and Ors.
Rejection of bid-Jurisdiction-Whether, rejection of petitioners' bids were neither arbitrary, nor procedurally unfair, illegal or lacking in bona fides. Held, procedural irregulari [LexDoc Id : 524549]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Adarsh Food Products (P) Ltd. vs State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.
Show cause notice-Blacklisting-Whether, show cause notice to petitioner with respect to blacklisting of its firm can be countenanced. Held, petitioner could have blacklisted in term [LexDoc Id : 524543]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2018 |
Raminder Kaur vs Delhi Development Authority
Genuine identity-Authenticated source of information-Whether, identity of petitioner was genuine; that she is wife of original registrant and there was change of address/residence and duly informed to th [LexDoc Id : 524538]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Binod Kumar Singh vs State of Bihar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 524536]
|
HC (Patna) |
2018 |
Thyseenkrupp Elevator India (P) Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Employ-Sale of goods-Whether, impugned order regarding employ the skilled and experienced engineers to carry out the installation and commissioning of lifts and elevators [LexDoc Id : 524269]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
VIP Industries Ltd. vs State of Karnataka and Ors.
Non-compliance of principal of natural justice-Contents of notice-Whether, reassessment order as well as demand notice liable to be quashed on basis of non-compliance of principal of natural justice. Held, principles [LexDoc Id : 524268]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
Aneja Construction India Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
Validity of tender process-Power of court-Petitioner complains of arbitrariness and seeks directions for quashing of notice inviting Tender and direction to quash the decision of the second re [LexDoc Id : 523908]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Assistant Commissioner vs Jyoti Laboratories Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 524917]
|
SC |
2018 |
Bihar State Electricity Board and Ors. vs Anupam Udyog
Breach of contract-Order 8 Rule 4 and 5 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908. Admissibility of facts-Whether, the lower court has rightly held that plaintiff entitled to recover Rs. 3,98,465.64/- from the defendants along with interest at the rate of [LexDoc Id : 523907]
|
HC (Patna) |
2018 |
Punj Lloyd Ltd. vs DCCT, CCT, State of Karnataka
[LexDoc Id : 524912]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
Ajay Rathore vs Chairman, Himachal Pradesh State Agricultural Marketing Board and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 523860]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2018 |
State of Tamil Nadu vs Raj Mosaic Tile Works, TVL Raj Floorings
[LexDoc Id : 524934]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2018 |
M.P. Power Management Co. Ltd. vs Renew Clean Energy (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Termination of contract-Delay-Whether, action of Appellant in terminating contract is arbitrary and was rightly set aside by High Court Held, High Court observed that delay in comp [LexDoc Id : 523581]
|
SC |
2018 |
Subaya Constructions Co. Ltd. vs Commissioner, Vellore City Municipal Corpn. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 523557]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2018 |
Kumari Archana vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 523552]
|
HC (Patna) |
2018 |
Fayaz Ahmad Bhat vs State and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 523553]
|
HC (Jammu and Kashmir) |
2018 |
B.L. Kashyap and Sons Ltd. vs Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 523531]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
Oriental Cuisines (P) Ltd. vs DCCT
[LexDoc Id : 524766]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
