| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 2648 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
CIT vs K.J. Hospital (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 305447]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2006 |
P.R. Metrani vs CIT
Presumption of ownership under s.132(4A)-Application of presumptions-AY 1981-82, 1982-83. The presumptions under s.132(4A) of the Income Tax Act 1961 were available only for the purpose of summary assessment under s.132 [LexDoc Id : 304249]
|
SC |
2006 |
UOI and Ors. vs S.K. Saigal and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 304158]
|
SC |
2006 |
CIT vs Shri Ram Niwas
Limitation for : modification of partner's assessment-Date of assessment of firm-AY 1977-78. The assessee was partner in the MCG. His return was processed under s.143(1) subject to rectification on assessment of firm. The assessmen [LexDoc Id : 330167]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2006 |
V.K. Ratti vs CIT
Residential status-Stay in India of person employed abroad-AY 1980-81. The assessee was an Indian citizen. He was employed in Hongkong from 24 October 1978 to 15 July 1979 i.e. for 9 months. On termination of [LexDoc Id : 328996]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2006 |
ITO vs Arihant X-Ray and Sonography Clinic (P) Ltd.
Cash credits: Genuineness of cash credits-Credits from income-tax assessees-AY 2000-01. The creditors were assessees and their addresses, PANs, copies of income tax return and pass-books were filed. They appeared before the AO [LexDoc Id : 328638]
|
ITAT (Ahmedabad) |
2006 |
S.K. Katyal vs DCIT
Admission of additional ground-Limitation for assessment-The reason for the ground that assessment order was time-barred arose after passing of the assessment order. Therefore, additional ground on limitatio [LexDoc Id : 327663]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2006 |
CWT vs Manjit Kaur
Net wealth: Additional compensation received-Appeal pending against award-AY 1988-89, 1989-90. The assessee had received additional compensation on acquisition of her property. Since the award was being disputed by the State [LexDoc Id : 319789]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2006 |
CIT and Anr. vs R.P.G. Telecoms Ltd.
Computation of deduction-Loss in leasing business-AY 1994-95. The assessee was engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling of telecommunication cables. The loss suffered in leasing business h [LexDoc Id : 317822]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2006 |
Lotus Investments Ltd. vs G.Y. Wagh, ACIT and Ors.
Limitation for reassessment-Original order set aside, Irrelevant directions by CIT(A)-AY 1989-90 – 1999-2000. The CIT(A)’s observations that the additions made to the assessee’s income as undisclosed income were not based on any materia [LexDoc Id : 308373]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2006 |
CIT vs Sanmar Holdings Ltd.
Business income versus income from property-Ownership of property: Onus on revenue-AY 1984-85 to AY 1986-1987. The assessee had rented its property with facilities like central-air conditioning and lifts etc. The Tribunal held that [LexDoc Id : 328079]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2006 |
Anil Kumar Bhandari vs JCIT and Ors.
Validity of: Re-assessment after four years-Change of opinion-AY 1994-95. While filing the original return, the assessee had filed alongwith the return, balance sheet, profit and loss account and tax-audit report [LexDoc Id : 327735]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2006 |
Rajendra Kumar vs Bhagwan Lal
[LexDoc Id : 320793]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2006 |
Ch. Ranganath Raju vs Bank of India and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 320327]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2006 |
CIT vs Star Builders
Unexplained investment: Construction business-Estimate of cost of construction by DVO, Validity of reference to DVO-No addition under s.69C of the Income Tax Act 1961 could be made to the assessee’s income on the basis of DVO’s report. The assessee was in constructi [LexDoc Id : 320207]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2006 |
Williamson Financial Services Ltd. vs CIT and Anr.
Deduction: Inter corporate dividend-Deduction on net dividend-The deduction under s.80M of the Income Tax Act 1961 was to be allowed to the assessee on net dividend, not on gross dividend.
S.80M of the [LexDoc Id : 319898]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2006 |
CIT vs Assam State Book Production and Publication Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
Exemption: Educational institution-Printing and sale of textbooks-AY 1981-82 – 1996-97. The assessee, a State Government company, was engaged in the business of printing and sale of textbooks. Since it was not impart [LexDoc Id : 309580]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2006 |
CIT vs Five Star Rugs
Duty of Tribunal-Passing a speaking order-The tribunal was duty bound to pass a speaking or reasoned order. It could not refer to the judgments of the high court and of the Apex Court cited by [LexDoc Id : 309443]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2006 |
All India State Bank Officers Federation, P.B. More, Sunil A. Bendra and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
Validity of taxing perquisites-Medical reimbursements-The Proviso to s.17(2)(v) of the Income Tax Act 1961, taxing medical reimbursements as perquisites as well as the provision exempting such reimburseme [LexDoc Id : 306718]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2006 |
Rajinikanth vs ACWT
[LexDoc Id : 306239]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2006 |
CIT vs Matrix Intel (P) Ltd.
Duty of Tribunal-Passing a speaking order-AY 1996-97. The Tribunal was under a duty to consider all the material and facts on record. A mere reference to decision of another bench without disc [LexDoc Id : 305817]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2006 |
CIT vs Altek Lammertz Needles Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 305169]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2006 |
National Institute of Technology and Ors. vs Chandra Shekhar Chaudhary
[LexDoc Id : 304131]
|
SC |
2006 |
ACIT vs Alembic Glass Industries Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 327785]
|
ITAT (Ahmedabad) |
2006 |
Arnab Kumar Sarkar vs Reba Mukherjee and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 320371]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2006 |
| |
| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| |
