Register free!

Banking - Judgement [ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950 1949 1948 1947 1946 1945 1944 1943 1942 1941 1940 1939 1938 1937 1936 1935 1934 1933 1932 1931 1930 1929 1928 1927 1926 1925 1924 1923 1922 1921 1920 1919 1918 1917 1915 1914 1902 1900 1896 Select Court HC SC Others   First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last Documents Found: 2648    Title Forum  Year Biyar Rubber (P) Ltd. vs CIT Investment allowance-Machinery installed-AY 1985-86. The assessee was neither entitled to investment allowance nor depreciation on the machinery, which, even though was installed, was not cap [LexDoc Id : 319246] HC (Karnataka) 2006 Hotel Naveen vs ITO Capital gains-Transfer of assets on dissolution of firm-No capital gains were assessable in the firm’s hands on transfer of assets and liabilities at book value to one of the partners, as there was no evide [LexDoc Id : 317911] ITAT (Delhi) 2006 Dhall Enterprises and Engineers (P) Ltd. vs CIT Deduction: Export of goods-Export to be out of India-AY 1989-90. The assessee had purchased certain goods in Germany and directly exported them from Germany to Poland. Since the goods were not exported o [LexDoc Id : 316612] HC (Gujarat) 2006 Armstrong Builders and Developers vs Vishvanath Naik [LexDoc Id : 316492] HC (Bombay) 2006 DCIT vs Yellamma Dasappa Hospital Depreciation allowance-Actual use of machinery-AY 1989-90. The assessee hospital was not entitled to claim depreciation allowance in respect of certain machinery, which was merely kept ready for us [LexDoc Id : 316230] HC (Karnataka) 2006 ACIT vs Vishwanath and Co. Unexplained cash credit-Genuineness of cash credits-AY 1985-86. The addition made to the assessee’s income on account of unexplained cash credit was justified since its explanation that the loan of huge [LexDoc Id : 316199] HC (Karnataka) 2006 Ind Sphinx Precision Ltd. vs CIT Revision by CIT-Erroneous order of AO, Silent order of assessment- AY 2000-01, 2001-02. The AO’s order, which was silent on errors pointed out in calculations of deduction under s.80HHC of the Income Tax Act 1961 an [LexDoc Id : 315642] ITAT (Chandigarh) 2006 Jayashree Tea and Industries Ltd. vs CIT and Ors. Rejection of revision by CIT-Revision based on later Apex Court’s judgment-The assessee had not claimed deduction of the provision made for payment of leave encashment during the assessment. Later, based on Apex Court’s subse [LexDoc Id : 309581] HC (Calcutta) 2006 ITO vs Jagdish Chandra Virmani Unexplained expenditure-Construction of shopping complex, Law applicable-AY 1993-94 – 1998-99. The assessee, a builder, had constructed a shopping complex during the assessment years 1993-94 to 1998-99. The difference betwe [LexDoc Id : 309110] ITAT (Delhi) 2006 State of Haryana and Ors. vs M.P. Mohla [LexDoc Id : 304016] SC 2006 Shahabad Co-op. Sugar Mills Ltd. vs Special Secretary to Govt. of Haryana Corpn. and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 304013] SC 2006 State of Uttaranchal vs Rajesh Kumar Gupta [LexDoc Id : 304009] SC 2006 Indian Airlines Ltd. vs Prabha D. Kanan [LexDoc Id : 304008] SC 2006 Jaswant Singh Gill vs Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 303990] SC 2006 U.P. Jal Nigam and Anr. vs Jaswant Singh and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 303987] SC 2006 Suresh Chandra Jha vs State of Bihar and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 303982] SC 2006 Srinivasa Rice Mill vs Employees State Insurance Corpn. [LexDoc Id : 303981] SC 2006 Textile Committee vs Saibaba Cotton Waste Spinning Mills Exemption from Cess-Textile made from waste-cotton-The petitions had challenged the levy of Cess under s.5 of the Central Excise Act, on manufacture of yarn from waste cotton. The yarn made from waste [LexDoc Id : 339040] HC (Bombay) 2006 Doaba Co-operative Sugar Mills vs CIT Summary assessment-Levy of additional tax-AY 1989-90. While processing the return under s.143(1), the loss returned was reduced. The additional tax under s.143(1A) was leviable. S.1 [LexDoc Id : 326929] HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2006 ACIT vs Jasper Investments Ltd. Business expenditure-Licence fee for use of software-The licence fee paid for use of computer software was business expenditure. S.37(1) of the Income Tax 1961 [LexDoc Id : 324501] ITAT (Mumbai) 2006 Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India vs Somnath Basu Professional Misconduct-Failure to rise to expected level of efficiency, Errors of judgment-FY 1991-92. The respondent was a practising chartered accountant. The failure to rise to the expected level of efficiency or error of judgment did not [LexDoc Id : 318421] HC (Calcutta) 2006 CIT vs Ranjit Kumar Choudhury Powers of CIT(A)-Admission of additional evidence-AY 1998-99. The evidence that was not furnished before the AO could not be entertained by the CIT(A) unless the reasons for failure to produce the sam [LexDoc Id : 308466] HC (Gauhati) 2006 Indian Airlines Ltd. vs Capt. Raman Doulagar [LexDoc Id : 303995] SC 2006 CIT vs Eli Lilly and Co. India (P) Ltd. TDS-Salary-Part of salary not paid by assessee-The assessee had paid salary to its expatriate employees on which TDS was made. These employees also received salary abroad from their employer. They [LexDoc Id : 326930] HC (Delhi) 2006 Pandurangan vs Sub Registrar, Reddiarpalayam Pondicherry and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 325045] HC (Madras) 2006   First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last