First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 2648 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
Rajesh Kumar and Ors. vs DCIT and Ors.
Opportunity to assessee-Directions for special audit under s.142(2A)-The directions under s.142(2A) of the Income Tax Act 1961 for special audit were not administrative instructions but were quasi-judicial orders. There [LexDoc Id : 303360]
|
SC |
2006 |
State of U.P. and Ors. vs Harihar Bhole Nath
[LexDoc Id : 303353]
|
SC |
2006 |
Mathura Prasad vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 303344]
|
SC |
2006 |
P.N. Writer and Co. Ltd. vs DCIT
Deductions: royalty etc. received from foreign enterprise-Use of: registered trademark- registered abroad-AY 2001-02. The assessee was engaged in relocation of personal and household effects. It had acquired specialised relocation solutions for relocation [LexDoc Id : 329306]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
Super Meter Mfg. Co. vs JCIT
Interest on borrowed capital-Interest free advances to sister concern-AY 1988-83. The assessee had advanced interest free loans to its sister concern. Most of its funds were obtained by way of interest-bearing loans. The [LexDoc Id : 326753]
|
ITAT (Pune) |
2006 |
ITO vs SRU Knitters (P) Ltd.
Penalty: Concealment of income-Bogus loss claimed-AY 1998-99. The assessee had claimed that it had incurred loss regarding purchases made from one A.R. Traders and sale of those goods to M/s Timely Im [LexDoc Id : 326626]
|
ITAT (Chandigarh) |
2006 |
Saraf Gramodyog Sansthan vs ITO
Validity of re-assessment-Return pending-AY 1999-2000. The assessee had filed the return on 26 April 2000 in response to notice under s.142(1), showing 'nil' income. During pendency of the re [LexDoc Id : 326576]
|
ITAT (Agra) |
2006 |
Raghav Bahl vs DCIT
Changeability of interest-Delay in filing block-return-The interest was chargeable in delay in filing block-return.
S.158BFA(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961
[LexDoc Id : 326386]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2006 |
CIT vs V. C. Kuganathan
Deductions: Export of goods-Transfer of: Rights to exhibit films-AY 1993-94. The assessee was engaged in film-business. He had acquired right over a film. It transferred rights to exhibit the film abroad. It was [LexDoc Id : 326008]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2006 |
DCIT vs Ramesh Chand Jain
Limitation for assesment-Applicability of proviso to s.129-AY 1991-92. During the course of the assessment proceedings there was a change in the incumbent AO. No intimation to that effect was given to the asse [LexDoc Id : 324505]
|
ITAT (Agra) |
2006 |
Abishek Developers vs ITO
Income arising in India-Payments for transfer of designs or drawings-AY 2002-03 to AY 2004-05. The assessee made payments to a non-resident company for supply of drawings and designs for its projects. These were transfe [LexDoc Id : 324331]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2006 |
CIT vs Sangu Chakra Hotels (P) Ltd.
Rate of depreciation-Hotel building-AY 1990-91 – 1992-93. The assessee company was running a hotel. A part of the hotel building was used for residence of employees and a part was let ou [LexDoc Id : 322831]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2006 |
Birla Group Holdings Ltd. vs DCIT
Disallowance of expenses-Expenses incurred to earn exempt income-AY 2001-02. The assessee had borrowed funds on interest for investment in shares of domestic companies. Although the interest on borrowed funds was no [LexDoc Id : 320443]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
Kalpataru Construction Overseas (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
Disallowance of expenses on exempt income-Law applicable-AY 1999-2000. The expenses incurred by the assessee on earning exempt income, even though were disallowable under s.14A(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961, [LexDoc Id : 319359]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
JCIT vs Arisudana Spg. Mills Ltd.
Income derived from industrial undertaking-Income from sale of trading goods-AY 1997-98, 1998-99, 2000-01. The assessee was engaged in the business of sale and manufacture of yarn along with trading in goods manufactured by oth [LexDoc Id : 316238]
|
ITAT (Chandigarh) |
2006 |
Business India Television International Ltd. vs ACIT
Short deduction of tax at source from salary-Allowance vs Reimbursement of expenses to employees-AY 1997-98, 1998-99. The assessee company was engaged in the business of television network to provide news, current affairs, etc. Besides paying sala [LexDoc Id : 315641]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2006 |
Rama Associates Ltd. vs DCIT
Failure to include ALV-Scope of instructions under s.263-The AO’s order omitting to include the annual letting value (ALV) of the assessee’s property was erroneous and could be set aside by the CIT. However, [LexDoc Id : 315094]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2006 |
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan vs Arunkumar Madhavrao Sinddhaye and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 303453]
|
SC |
2006 |
R.K. Agrawal vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 303452]
|
SC |
2006 |
State, CBI vs Sashi Balasubramanian and Anr.
KVSS: Maintainability of declaration-Declaration by public servants, Scope of immunity from prosecution-
The immunity from prosecution granted under Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme 1998 was available only in respect of offences committed under the direct and [LexDoc Id : 303364]
|
SC |
2006 |
The Government of Andhra Pradesh and Ors. vs A. Venkata Rayudu
[LexDoc Id : 303358]
|
SC |
2006 |
All India ITDC Workers Union and Ors. vs ITDC and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 303357]
|
SC |
2006 |
Banshi Dhar vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 303356]
|
SC |
2006 |
Jasbir Singh vs Punjab and Sind Bank and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 303351]
|
SC |
2006 |
M. Raja vs CEERI Educational Society Pilani and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 303350]
|
SC |
2006 |
|
First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
|