First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 2648 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
D. Komalakshi, D. Rajkumar vs DCIT
Maintainability of appeal before CIT(A)-Non-payment of admitted tax-Block Period 1995-96 – 28 September 2001. The assessee had filed the block return under s.158BC of the Income Tax Act 1961 disclosing certain undisclo [LexDoc Id : 319610]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2006 |
Rashmi Mehra and Ors. vs EAC Trading Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 319301]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2006 |
CIT vs Lake Palace Hotels and Motels (P) Ltd.
Rate of depreciation-Vehicles run on hire, Renting cars to tourists-AY 1992-93, 1993-94. The assessee company, mainly engaged in hotel business, also carried on the business of giving cars on hire to tourists, who stay [LexDoc Id : 318301]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2006 |
CIT vs Shreyans Industries Ltd.
Capital expenditure-Acquiring land for discharge of effluents-AY 1996-97. The assessee was engaged in the business of manufacturing paper. The expenses incurred by it on construction of a drain through forest lan [LexDoc Id : 306942]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2006 |
Parmod Kumar Dang vs JCIT
Deemed dividend: Accumulated profits-Undisclosed income assessed under s.158BC-AY 1996-97. The undisclosed income determined under s.158BC of the Income Tax Act 1961 would not constitute accumulate profits for applying s.2(22)(e) [LexDoc Id : 305827]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2006 |
Meenu Sahi Mamik : In Re
Maintainability of application for Advance Ruling-Exemption for industry set up in backward areas of a State-The applicant, a non-resident, sought to establish a manufacturing unit for drugs in Himachal Pradesh for which an Indian company proposed to get thei [LexDoc Id : 305500]
|
AAR |
2006 |
Areva T And D India Ltd. vs ACIT
Validity of reassessment: Procedural irregularity-Non-issue of notice under s.143(2), Non-consideration of objections to reopening-AY 1999-2000. The completion of reassessment proceedings without considering the assessee’s objections to reopening and without issuing a notice under [LexDoc Id : 305310]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2006 |
Rajiv Piramal Investments (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
Computation of capital gains-Renouncement of right shares, Cost of acquisition-AY 1993-94. The diminution in the market price of the original shares held by the assessee was to be considered as the cost of acquisition of the righ [LexDoc Id : 304982]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
Bhagwandas Tiwari and Ors. vs Dewas Shajapur Kshetriya Gramin Bank and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 303996]
|
SC |
2006 |
Raythara Sahakari Bank Ltd. vs Chandrakala R. Das
Deficiency in banking service-Damages claimed for stolen ornaments-The appeal against the order of the National Commission that upheld the District Forum’s order for compensation for loss caused due to theft was dismi [LexDoc Id : 303994]
|
SC |
2006 |
Som Nath Maini vs CIT
Income from undisclosed sources-Burden of proof: Burden on revenue-AY 1998-99. The assessee had claimed capital loss on sale of jewellery and also short term capital gains of almost equal amount, from sale of shares. [LexDoc Id : 351298]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2006 |
CIT vs Coimbatore Alcohol and Chemicals Ltd.
Business expenditure-Replacement of machinery-AY 1994-95. The expenses incurred on replacement of machinery was not capital expenditure.
S.37(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961
[LexDoc Id : 332213]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2006 |
Ashok Kumar Karola vs ACIT
Unexplained money and gold etc.-Seizure of unexplained money, Loss on confiscation – Business loss-AY 1987-88. The assessee was a gold smith. He was found in possession of certain primary gold and US dollars. The investment in these items was not [LexDoc Id : 326637]
|
ITAT (Jaipur) |
2006 |
Shyam Nathani vs ITO
Penalty: Concealment of income-Addition to income on estimate-AY 1991-92, 1992-93. No penalty for concealment of income was leviable on the assessee since the addition to the assessee’s income was made on estimat [LexDoc Id : 322567]
|
ITAT (Jaipur) |
2006 |
CIT vs Janatha Steel Mills (P) Ltd.
Rectification of mistake-Deduction wrongly allowed-The allowance of deduction under s.32AB of the Income Tax Act 1961 to the assessee in respect of its share income from three firms, being contrary to [LexDoc Id : 320009]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2006 |
ITO vs Anand Chhabra
Additions to income: Validity of survey-Statements recorded during survey-AY 1998-99. The additions made to the assessee’s income on the basis of certain statements recorded during survey, which neither bore the name nor the [LexDoc Id : 318880]
|
ITAT (Jodhpur) |
2006 |
Harshila Chordia vs ITO
Unexplained cash credits-Amounts received from customers-The amounts received by the assessee in cash against actual delivery of vehicles could not be assessed as unexplained cash credit under s.68 of the In [LexDoc Id : 317838]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2006 |
Shyam Gopal Charitable Trust vs DIT
Penalty: Late filing of return of income-Reasonable cause, CA’s advice-No penalty under s.272A(2)(e) of the Income Tax Act 1961 was leviable on the assessee who, based on the advice of its chartered accountant, could not [LexDoc Id : 306751]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2006 |
Shashikant vs Central Bureau of Investigation and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 303832]
|
SC |
2006 |
CIT vs D. Subramanian
Appeal to High court-Determination of cost of construction-AY 1999-2000. The determination of cost of constructed on the basis of approved valuer’s report or on DVO’s report was a question of fact.
S. [LexDoc Id : 332211]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2006 |
Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. vs State of Uttaranchal
[LexDoc Id : 329146]
|
HC (Uttarakhand) |
2006 |
M. A. Parthasarathy vs Bank of Baroda and Anr.
Recovery of loan-Responsibility of outgoing partner-The contention of the appellant that he had been absolved of his liability as an outgoing partner was not maintainable. The appellant, being promisor, [LexDoc Id : 326185]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2006 |
Plantation Corpn. of Kerala Ltd. vs State of Kerala
Computation of agricultural income-Deduction on replanting allowance-The replanting allowance was to be allowed as deducton for accumulated expenses on replanting.
S.2 of the Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Ac [LexDoc Id : 320844]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2006 |
S.D.S. Mongia vs CBDT
Exemption from tax: Income wrongly returned by assessee-Annuity received from Superannuation Fund-AY 1990-91 – 1993-94. The assessee had received annuity from Superannuation Fund, which was exempt from tax under s.10(13)(ii) of the Income Tax Act 1 [LexDoc Id : 319278]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2006 |
CIT vs Metal and Metals of India
Cash credit in firm’s books of accounts-Credit in partner’s account-The assessee firm’s partner had admitted to have made the deposit with the firm out of the amount received by him as gift. Therefore, the amount could [LexDoc Id : 319186]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2006 |
|
First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
|